Compare StocksBAC vs ELV

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Elevance Health, Inc. (ELV): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-21, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. ELV is undervalued at $389, with an intrinsic value of $662 and a margin of safety of 41%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
ELV
Elevance Health, Inc.
$388.50

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
ELV
  • Elevance Health, Inc. scores 95/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -0.6x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
ELV
  • FCF yield of 5.1% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 24.1% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
ELV
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$4.30B
N/A
FCF Yield
5.10%
13.95
Trailing P/E
16.48
11.13
Forward P/E
13.28
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
11.06%
10.64%
ROE
12.09%
0.00%
Gross Margin
25.89%
1.00
PEG Ratio
1.42
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.61
1.99%
Dividend Yield
1.77%
BAC: 4Ties: 1ELV: 3
BACELV

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

ELV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ELV
$-3.39
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$13.20B
Δ Market Cap
$-44.69B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ELV
41.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 41.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $388.50
Fair Value: $661.50
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

ELV

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $389?

+1.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.6%

The market implies +1.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +6.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
ELV
95/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ELV
-2.21
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ELV
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 93.4%Retail & Other 6.4%
No. of Institutional Holders2,005
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ELV
0
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.68M
COLLIS STEVEN H
Director
$869,520
@ $289.84 · 2026-03-05
DEVORE SUSAN D
Director
$374,580
@ $312.15 · 2025-08-19
BOUDREAUX GAIL A KOZIARA
Chief Executive Officer
$2.44M
@ $286.94 · 2025-07-18
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ELV
3
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.74M
PENCZEK RONALD W
Officer
$148,766
@ $403.16 · 2026-06-12
DIXON ROBERT L JR
Director
$60,667
@ $401.77 · 2026-06-11
PENCZEK RONALD W
Officer
$617,192
@ $403.13 · 2026-05-19
SCHULMAN AMY W.
Director
$7,475
@ $287.50 · 2026-03-12
KENDRICK CHARLES MORGAN JR
Officer
$910,604
@ $284.92 · 2026-03-06
KAYE MARK
Chief Financial Officer
$1.95M
@ $424.82 · 2025-04-24
PENCZEK RONALD W
Officer
$183,903
@ $415.13 · 2025-03-10
KENDRICK CHARLES MORGAN JR
President
$1.39M
@ $396.30 · 2025-03-05
KENDRICK CHARLES MORGAN JR
Officer
$3.21M
@ $432.14 · 2024-10-18
PERU RAMIRO G
Director
$400,235
@ $531.52 · 2024-08-05
BOUDREAUX GAIL A KOZIARA
Chief Executive Officer
$17.03M
@ $500.98 · 2024-07-22
DIXON ROBERT L JR
Director
$154,562
@ $506.76 · 2024-07-19
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ELV
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
ELV
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
View BAC Full AnalysisView ELV Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs ELV

Is Bank of America Corporation or Elevance Health, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to ELV's 41.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $662 vs. $389).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Elevance Health, Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while ELV scores 95/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ELV scores 2.6 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Elevance Health, Inc.?

ELV earns 11.1% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Elevance Health, Inc.'s?

ELV's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). ELV has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.