Compare StocksBAC vs EA

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Electronic Arts Inc. (EA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. EA is overvalued at $202, with an intrinsic value of $91 and a margin of safety of -123%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
EA
Electronic Arts Inc.
$202.15

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
EA
  • Gross margin of 79.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Electronic Arts Inc. scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 20.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
EA
  • Trailing P/E of 57.6x is 26% above the historical average of 45.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • 5 insider sales totaling $2.9M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
EA
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$2.22B
N/A
FCF Yield
4.38%
13.95
Trailing P/E
57.59
11.13
Forward P/E
21.05
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
16.57%
10.64%
ROE
13.49%
0.00%
Gross Margin
78.97%
1.02
PEG Ratio
1.26
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.76
1.97%
Dividend Yield
0.37%
BAC: 4Ties: 1EA: 3
BACEA

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

EA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
EA
$4.96
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.69B
Δ Market Cap
+$13.33B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
EA
123.1% Overvalued
Price is 123.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $202.15
Fair Value: $90.63
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

EA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $202?

+20.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.2%

The market implies +20.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
EA
90/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
EA
-3.08
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
EA
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 95.2%Retail & Other 4.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,466
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
EA
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
EA
5
Sells (3M)
24
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $11.89M
KELLY ERIC CHARLES
Officer
$602,496
@ $200.83 · 2026-05-28
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$302,040
@ $201.36 · 2026-05-20
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$1.01M
@ $201.19 · 2026-05-20
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$501,344
@ $200.54 · 2026-05-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$508,026
@ $203.21 · 2026-04-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$499,884
@ $199.95 · 2026-03-16
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$299,842
@ $199.89 · 2026-02-17
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$498,825
@ $199.53 · 2026-02-17
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$510,667
@ $204.27 · 2026-01-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$510,284
@ $204.11 · 2025-12-15
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$302,475
@ $201.65 · 2025-11-20
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$502,643
@ $201.06 · 2025-11-17
KELLY ERIC CHARLES
Officer
$802,049
@ $200.51 · 2025-11-07
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$240,961
@ $200.80 · 2025-10-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$504,477
@ $201.79 · 2025-10-01
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$1.98M
@ $197.94 · 2025-09-29
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$205,824
@ $171.52 · 2025-09-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$429,234
@ $171.69 · 2025-09-02
UBINAS LUIS A.
Director
$297,707
@ $170.51 · 2025-08-21
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$171,059
@ $171.06 · 2025-08-20
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$209,580
@ $174.65 · 2025-08-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$388,733
@ $155.49 · 2025-08-01
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$222,486
@ $148.32 · 2025-07-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$398,744
@ $159.50 · 2025-07-01
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$223,035
@ $148.69 · 2025-06-16
MIELE LAURA KAREN
President
$363,803
@ $145.52 · 2025-06-02
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$151,320
@ $151.32 · 2025-05-20
KELLY ERIC CHARLES
Officer
$302,090
@ $151.04 · 2025-05-16
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$224,462
@ $149.64 · 2025-05-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$388,929
@ $155.57 · 2025-05-08
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$218,468
@ $145.65 · 2025-04-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$362,764
@ $145.11 · 2025-04-01
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$208,470
@ $138.98 · 2025-03-17
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$325,837
@ $130.33 · 2025-03-03
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$130,108
@ $130.11 · 2025-02-20
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$192,900
@ $128.60 · 2025-02-18
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$327,078
@ $130.83 · 2025-02-06
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$215,175
@ $143.45 · 2025-01-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$365,371
@ $146.15 · 2025-01-02
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$148,180
@ $148.18 · 2024-12-26
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$234,409
@ $156.27 · 2024-12-16
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$244,950
@ $163.30 · 2024-11-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$395,086
@ $158.03 · 2024-11-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
EA
FearGreed
😏Greed(68/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
EA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (68)
View BAC Full AnalysisView EA Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs EA

Is Bank of America Corporation or Electronic Arts Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to EA's -123.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $91 vs. $202).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Electronic Arts Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while EA scores 90/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. EA scores 6.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Electronic Arts Inc.?

EA earns 16.6% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Electronic Arts Inc.'s?

EA's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). EA has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.

BAC vs EA: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io