Compare StocksBAC vs DUK

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Duke Energy Corporation (DUK): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. DUK is overvalued at $124, with an intrinsic value of $16 and a margin of safety of -655%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
$123.86

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
DUK
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $10.43 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Trailing P/E of 19.1x is 20% below the historical average of 23.9x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
DUK
  • PEG ratio of 2.67 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • High leverage (1.58x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.4x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
DUK
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$-2.25B
N/A
FCF Yield
-2.33%
13.95
Trailing P/E
19.06
11.13
Forward P/E
17.27
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
4.46%
10.64%
ROE
9.66%
0.00%
Gross Margin
51.05%
1.02
PEG Ratio
2.67
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
1.58
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.41
1.97%
Dividend Yield
3.38%
BAC: 4Ties: 1DUK: 3
BACDUK

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

DUK

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
DUK
$4.60
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.58B
Δ Market Cap
+$11.85B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
DUK
655.4% Overvalued
Price is 655.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $123.86
Fair Value: $16.40
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

DUK

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
DUK
47/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
DUK
-2.76
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
DUK
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 70.8%Retail & Other 29.1%
No. of Institutional Holders2,989
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
DUK
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
DUK
2
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $11.14M
RENJEL LOUIS E
Officer
$438,025
@ $125.15 · 2026-05-11
SIDERIS HARRY K.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.49M
@ $124.37 · 2026-05-08
GHARTEY-TAGOE KODWO
Officer
$2.40M
@ $131.57 · 2026-03-02
REPKO REGIS T
Officer
$86,853
@ $131.00 · 2026-03-02
REPKO REGIS T
Officer
$123,001
@ $127.86 · 2026-02-24
SAVOY BRIAN D.
Chief Financial Officer
$1.53M
@ $127.69 · 2026-02-23
REPKO REGIS T
Officer
$556,540
@ $127.18 · 2026-02-20
RENJEL LOUIS E
Officer
$868,156
@ $127.67 · 2026-02-12
GLENN ROBERT ALEXANDER
Officer
$1.02M
@ $123.80 · 2025-11-19
RENJEL LOUIS E
Officer
$100,520
@ $125.65 · 2025-11-18
TITONE BONNIE B.
Officer
$248,764
@ $124.38 · 2025-08-20
WEINTRAUB ALEXANDER J
Officer
$48,656
@ $121.64 · 2025-08-19
GILLESPIE THOMAS PRESTON JR.
Officer
$832,542
@ $124.26 · 2025-08-12
MCKEE E MARIE
Director
$201,057
@ $124.88 · 2025-08-07
RENJEL LOUIS E
Officer
$198,378
@ $125.56 · 2025-08-07
GHARTEY-TAGOE KODWO
Officer
$1.05M
@ $117.10 · 2025-02-28
JANSON JULIA S.
Officer
$1.16M
@ $116.09 · 2025-02-26
RENJEL LOUIS E
Officer
$542,969
@ $111.49 · 2025-02-18
RENJEL LOUIS E
Officer
$44,592
@ $111.48 · 2024-11-15
GLENN ROBERT ALEXANDER
Officer
$1.65M
@ $109.74 · 2024-11-15
JANSON JULIA S.
Officer
$1.13M
@ $112.58 · 2024-08-23
RENJEL LOUIS E
Officer
$61,366
@ $113.64 · 2024-08-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
DUK
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
DUK
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
View BAC Full AnalysisView DUK Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs DUK

Is Bank of America Corporation or Duke Energy Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to DUK's -655.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $16 vs. $124).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Duke Energy Corporation?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while DUK scores 47/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. DUK scores 0.7 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Duke Energy Corporation?

DUK earns 4.5% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Duke Energy Corporation's?

BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to DUK's 63/100 (Safe). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.