Compare StocksBAC vs DOC

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Healthpeak Properties, Inc. (DOC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BAC is undervalued at $58, with a DCF intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of 59%. DOC is overvalued at $20, with an intrinsic value of $0 and a margin of safety of -100%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$57.90
VS
DOC
Healthpeak Properties, Inc.
$20.35

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.90 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
DOC
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 11.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • FCF yield of 11.4% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
DOC
  • Share count has increased by 27% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • PEG ratio of 4.32 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
DOC
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$1.65B
N/A
FCF Yield
11.40%
13.37
Trailing P/E
58.14
10.94
Forward P/E
145.36
Quality & Moat
4.37%
ROIC
1.88%
11.20%
ROE
3.04%
0.00%
Gross Margin
57.65%
0.90
PEG Ratio
4.32
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.91
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.53
2.21%
Dividend Yield
6.00%
BAC: 5Ties: 1DOC: 2
BACDOC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

DOC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
DOC
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-1.68B
Δ Market Cap
$-2.53B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
59.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $57.90
Fair Value: $142.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
DOC
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $20.35
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

DOC

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $20?

+47.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +2.9%

The market implies +47.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +2.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
DOC
57/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
DOC
-2.75
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.0%Institutions 71.3%Retail & Other 21.7%
No. of Institutional Holders4,542
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
DOC
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 97.8%Retail & Other 1.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,048
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
DOC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
THOMAS JOHN T
Director
$24,730
@ $17.06 · 2025-08-06
BRINKER SCOTT M
Chief Executive Officer
$25,077
@ $16.83 · 2025-08-04
BRINKER SCOTT M
Chief Executive Officer
$49,986
@ $17.06 · 2025-07-31
BRINKER SCOTT M
Chief Executive Officer
$49,990
@ $17.40 · 2025-07-28
THOMPSON TOMMY G
Director
$99,769
@ $17.27 · 2025-05-28
THOMPSON TOMMY G
Director
$98,974
@ $17.36 · 2025-05-09
BRINKER SCOTT M
Chief Executive Officer
$47,822
@ $17.39 · 2025-05-09
LIAS-BOOKER AVA E.
Director
$89,150
@ $17.83 · 2025-04-29
SHELLEY-KESSLER PAMELA J
Director
$49,991
@ $17.61 · 2025-04-28
THOMAS JOHN T
Director
$74,928
@ $17.84 · 2025-04-28
BRINKER SCOTT M
Chief Executive Officer
$200,438
@ $17.68 · 2025-04-28
SANDSTROM KATHERINE M
Director
$199,233
@ $17.65 · 2025-04-28
LEWIS SARA GROOTWASSINK
Director
$105,938
@ $17.66 · 2025-04-28
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
DOC
0
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $213,740
BOHN SCOTT R
Officer
$213,740
@ $19.45 · 2026-05-12
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
DOC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
DOC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
View BAC Full AnalysisView DOC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs DOC

Is Bank of America Corporation or Healthpeak Properties, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 59.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $142 vs. price $58), compared to DOC's -100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $0 vs. $20).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Healthpeak Properties, Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while DOC scores 57/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. DOC scores 0.8 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Healthpeak Properties, Inc.?

BAC earns 4.4% ROIC versus DOC's 1.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s?

BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to DOC's 33/100 (Unsafe). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

BAC vs DOC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io