Compare StocksBAC vs DHR

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Danaher Corporation (DHR): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-21, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. DHR is overvalued at $177, with an intrinsic value of $136 and a margin of safety of -30%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
DHR
Danaher Corporation
$177.17

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
DHR
  • Altman Z-Score of 4.49 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
DHR
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 2 out of 2 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • 9 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 10.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
DHR
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$4.57B
N/A
FCF Yield
3.64%
13.95
Trailing P/E
34.34
11.13
Forward P/E
19.15
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
6.18%
10.64%
ROE
7.08%
0.00%
Gross Margin
58.99%
1.00
PEG Ratio
1.13
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.26
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.76
1.99%
Dividend Yield
0.90%
BAC: 5Ties: 1DHR: 2
BACDHR

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

DHR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
DHR
$-1.02
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$9.38B
Δ Market Cap
$-9.55B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
DHR
30.1% Overvalued
Price is 30.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $177.17
Fair Value: $136.18
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

DHR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $177?

+12.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.4%

The market implies +12.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
DHR
46/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
DHR
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
DHR
Insiders 10.7%Institutions 84.7%Retail & Other 4.5%
No. of Institutional Holders2,931
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
DHR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
DHR
1
Sells (3M)
9
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $236.38M
SPOON ALAN G
Director
$237,207
@ $174.67 · 2026-05-01
MILOSEVICH GREGORY M
Officer
$274,575
@ $208.01 · 2026-02-19
LIST TERI
Director
$746,997
@ $226.50 · 2025-11-18
ELLIS BRIAN W
General Counsel
$4.77M
@ $219.23 · 2025-11-12
RALES MITCHELL P
Officer and Director
$95.57M
@ $218.69 · 2025-11-12
MCGREW MATTHEW
Chief Financial Officer
$3.47M
@ $214.62 · 2025-11-11
COUCHARA GEORGEANN F.
Officer
$1.09M
@ $210.42 · 2025-11-10
RALES MITCHELL P
Officer and Director
$129.64M
@ $216.06 · 2025-10-31
LIST-STOLL TERI L.
Director
$586,319
@ $211.06 · 2025-08-22
RALES STEVEN M
Chairman of the Board
$245.92M
@ $196.74 · 2025-05-12
RILEY CHRISTOPHER PAUL
Officer
$3.13M
@ $198.00 · 2025-04-30
SPOON ALAN G
Director
$113,553
@ $206.46 · 2025-02-07
ELLIS BRIAN W
General Counsel
$1.28M
@ $224.13 · 2025-01-30
RASKAS DANIEL A
Officer
$8.22M
@ $236.93 · 2024-11-26
COUCHARA GEORGEANN F.
Officer
$255,483
@ $268.36 · 2024-08-26
MCGREW MATTHEW
Chief Financial Officer
$4.53M
@ $279.84 · 2024-08-01
FILLER LINDA
Director
$1.10M
@ $279.50 · 2024-08-01
BLAIR RAINER M
Chief Executive Officer
$2.52M
@ $280.00 · 2024-07-31
RASKAS DANIEL A
Officer
$3.92M
@ $270.51 · 2024-07-25
ELLIS BRIAN W
General Counsel
$2.64M
@ $275.16 · 2024-07-25
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
DHR
FearGreed
😐Neutral(41/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
DHR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
View BAC Full AnalysisView DHR Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs DHR

Is Bank of America Corporation or Danaher Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to DHR's -30.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $136 vs. $177).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Danaher Corporation?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while DHR scores 46/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. DHR scores 4.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Danaher Corporation?

DHR earns 6.2% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Danaher Corporation's?

DHR's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). DHR has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.