Compare StocksBAC vs DECK

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. DECK is undervalued at $109, with an intrinsic value of $202 and a margin of safety of 46%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
$109.11

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
DECK
  • Deckers Outdoor Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Deckers Outdoor Corporation scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 34.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
DECK
  • FCF yield of 5.7% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
DECK
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$858.73M
N/A
FCF Yield
5.67%
13.95
Trailing P/E
15.54
11.13
Forward P/E
13.15
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
21.06%
10.64%
ROE
40.86%
0.00%
Gross Margin
57.70%
1.02
PEG Ratio
1.37
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
-1.14
1.97%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
BAC: 4Ties: 1DECK: 3
BACDECK

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

DECK

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
DECK
$-0.81
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$2.75B
Δ Market Cap
$-2.22B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
DECK
46.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 46.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $109.11
Fair Value: $202.36
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

DECK

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $109?

+2.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.5%

The market implies +2.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +4.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
DECK
93/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
DECK
-2.77
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
DECK
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 100.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,319
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
DECK
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
DAVIS CINDY L
Director
$200,319
@ $109.76 · 2025-06-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
DECK
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.20M
SPANGENBERG ANNE
Officer
$471,389
@ $116.02 · 2026-02-13
SPRING-GREEN ROBIN
Officer
$39,482
@ $113.78 · 2026-02-13
SHANAHAN LAURI M.
Director
$537,681
@ $114.84 · 2026-02-13
OGBECHIE ANGELA
Officer
$118,910
@ $81.45 · 2025-10-31
IBRAHIM MAHA SALEH
Director
$35,405
@ $118.02 · 2025-09-08
IBRAHIM MAHA SALEH
Director
$32,723
@ $109.08 · 2025-06-06
OGBECHIE ANGELA
Officer
$648,675
@ $103.89 · 2025-06-02
IBRAHIM MAHA SALEH
Director
$40,344
@ $134.48 · 2025-03-06
POWERS DAVID A
Director
$3.47M
@ $138.84 · 2025-02-28
STEFANO CAROTI
Chief Executive Officer
$2.97M
@ $208.34 · 2024-12-11
IBRAHIM MAHA SALEH
Director
$60,239
@ $200.80 · 2024-12-06
SPANGENBERG ANNE
Officer
$723,721
@ $186.43 · 2024-11-22
STEWART BONITA C
Director
$838,935
@ $186.43 · 2024-11-22
ELLERKER MARCO
Officer
$992,858
@ $175.20 · 2024-11-20
STEFANO CAROTI
Chief Executive Officer
$2.64M
@ $175.73 · 2024-11-19
GARCIA THOMAS
Officer
$3.16M
@ $175.28 · 2024-11-19
FASCHING STEVEN J
Chief Financial Officer
$1.54M
@ $175.00 · 2024-11-08
STEWART BONITA C
Director
$1.58M
@ $175.42 · 2024-11-08
OGBECHIE ANGELA
Officer
$208,617
@ $163.24 · 2024-10-31
FASCHING STEVEN J
Chief Financial Officer
$1.53M
@ $166.67 · 2024-10-04
IBRAHIM MAHA SALEH
Director
$43,253
@ $865.06 · 2024-09-06
POWERS DAVID A
Director
$3.38M
@ $863.08 · 2024-09-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
DECK
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
DECK
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
View BAC Full AnalysisView DECK Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs DECK

Is Bank of America Corporation or Deckers Outdoor Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to DECK's 46.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $202 vs. $109).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Deckers Outdoor Corporation?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while DECK scores 93/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. DECK scores 11.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Deckers Outdoor Corporation?

DECK earns 21.1% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.