Compare Stocks › BAC vs DECK

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, BAC is undervalued at $50, with a DCF intrinsic value of $180 and a margin of safety of 72%. DECK is undervalued at $82, with an intrinsic value of $151 and a margin of safety of 46%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$50.01
VS
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
$81.99

Rewards

BAC
  • ★Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.91 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
DECK
  • ★Deckers Outdoor Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Deckers Outdoor Corporation scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 34.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

BAC
  • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
DECK

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    BAC
    DECK
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.10B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    10.03%
    11.94
    Trailing P/E
    10.86
    9.64
    Forward P/E
    10.02
    Quality & Moat
    3.80%
    ROIC
    40.50%
    10.73%
    ROE
    44.27%
    0.00%
    Gross Margin
    58.92%
    0.91
    PEG Ratio
    0.97
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Net Debt / Equity
    Net cash
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -0.48
    2.56%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    BAC: 2Ties: 2DECK: 4
    BACDECK

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    BAC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    DECK

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    BAC
    $2.37
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $55.63B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$131.83B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    DECK
    $-2.19
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $2.75B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-6.02B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    BAC
    72.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 72.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $50.01
    Fair Value: $180.08
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    DECK
    45.8% Margin of Safety
    Price is 45.8% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $81.99
    Fair Value: $151.35
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    BAC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    DECK

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $82?

    -1.8%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -2.8%

    The market implies -1.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -2.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    BAC
    100/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    DECK
    93/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    BAC
    -2.31
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    DECK
    -2.77
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    BAC
    Insiders 7.1%Institutions 71.9%Retail & Other 21.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,517
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    DECK
    Insiders 0.7%Institutions 104.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,319
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    BAC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    DECK
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    DAVIS CINDY L
    Director
    $200,319
    @ $109.76 · 2025-06-06
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    BAC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $20.17M
    MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
    Officer
    $4.41M
    @ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
    SCRIVENER THOMAS M
    Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
    BRONSTEIN SHERI B
    Officer
    $2.99M
    @ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
    ATHANASIA DEAN C
    President
    $6.86M
    @ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
    BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.42M
    @ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    DECK
    0
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.05M
    SPANGENBERG ANNE
    Officer
    $471,389
    @ $116.02 · 2026-02-13
    SPRING-GREEN ROBIN
    Officer
    $39,482
    @ $113.78 · 2026-02-13
    SHANAHAN LAURI M.
    Director
    $537,681
    @ $114.84 · 2026-02-13
    OGBECHIE ANGELA
    Officer
    $118,910
    @ $81.45 · 2025-10-31
    IBRAHIM MAHA SALEH
    Director
    $35,405
    @ $118.02 · 2025-09-08
    IBRAHIM MAHA SALEH
    Director
    $32,723
    @ $109.08 · 2025-06-06
    OGBECHIE ANGELA
    Officer
    $648,675
    @ $103.89 · 2025-06-02
    IBRAHIM MAHA SALEH
    Director
    $40,344
    @ $134.48 · 2025-03-06
    POWERS DAVID A
    Director
    $3.47M
    @ $138.84 · 2025-02-28
    STEFANO CAROTI
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.97M
    @ $208.34 · 2024-12-11
    IBRAHIM MAHA SALEH
    Director
    $60,239
    @ $200.80 · 2024-12-06
    SPANGENBERG ANNE
    Officer
    $723,721
    @ $186.43 · 2024-11-22
    STEWART BONITA C
    Director
    $838,935
    @ $186.43 · 2024-11-22
    ELLERKER MARCO
    Officer
    $992,858
    @ $175.20 · 2024-11-20
    GARCIA THOMAS
    Officer
    $3.16M
    @ $175.28 · 2024-11-19
    STEFANO CAROTI
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.64M
    @ $175.73 · 2024-11-19
    FASCHING STEVEN J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.54M
    @ $175.00 · 2024-11-08
    STEWART BONITA C
    Director
    $1.58M
    @ $175.42 · 2024-11-08
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    BAC
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(39/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    DECK
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(32/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    BAC
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
    DECK
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (32)
    View BAC Full AnalysisView DECK Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs DECK

    Is Bank of America Corporation or Deckers Outdoor Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 72.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $180 vs. price $50), compared to DECK's 45.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $151 vs. $82).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Deckers Outdoor Corporation?▼

    BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while DECK scores 93/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?▼

    BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. DECK scores 9.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Deckers Outdoor Corporation?▼

    DECK earns 40.5% ROIC versus BAC's 3.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.