Compare Stocks › BAC vs DDOG

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Datadog, Inc. (DDOG): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, BAC is undervalued at $50, with a DCF intrinsic value of $180 and a margin of safety of 72%. DDOG is overvalued at $235, with an intrinsic value of $22 and a margin of safety of -968%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$50.01
VS
DDOG
Datadog, Inc.
$235.27

Rewards

BAC
  • ★Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.91 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
DDOG
  • ★Gross margin of 79.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 37.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.16 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

BAC
  • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
DDOG
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 10% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 1.2% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠23 insider sales totaling $162.4M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
DDOG
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$1.05B
N/A
FCF Yield
1.24%
11.94
Trailing P/E
470.54
9.64
Forward P/E
78.83
Quality & Moat
3.80%
ROIC
0.37%
10.73%
ROE
4.70%
0.00%
Gross Margin
79.54%
0.91
PEG Ratio
1.22
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
-44.73
2.56%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
BAC: 6Ties: 1DDOG: 1
BACDDOG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

DDOG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
DDOG
$71.99
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$340.1M
Δ Market Cap
+$24.48B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
72.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 72.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $50.01
Fair Value: $180.08
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
DDOG
967.6% Overvalued
Price is 967.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $235.27
Fair Value: $22.04
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

DDOG

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $235?

+60.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +26.2%

The market implies +60.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +26.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
DDOG
49/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
DDOG
-2.63
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.1%Institutions 71.9%Retail & Other 21.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,517
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
DDOG
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 93.3%Retail & Other 6.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,842
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
DDOG
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
DDOG
23
Sells (3M)
58
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $466.49M
ACOCELLA KERRY
General Counsel
$1.21M
@ $228.85 · 2026-09-14
OBSTLER DAVID M
Chief Financial Officer
$9.10M
@ $227.47 · 2026-09-14
WALTERS SEAN MICHAEL
Officer
$2.59M
@ $221.04 · 2026-09-11
LI YANBING
Officer
$2.81M
@ $221.26 · 2026-09-11
POMEL OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$18.60M
@ $207.86 · 2026-09-08
RICHARDSON JULIE G
Director
$1.19M
@ $212.25 · 2026-09-04
BLITZER ADAM
Chief Operating Officer
$2.58M
@ $214.38 · 2026-09-03
RICHARDSON JULIE G
Director
$1.24M
@ $220.00 · 2026-09-03
ACOCELLA KERRY
General Counsel
$1.56M
@ $212.90 · 2026-09-02
WALTERS SEAN MICHAEL
Officer
$2.89M
@ $212.90 · 2026-09-02
POMEL OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$5.61M
@ $212.90 · 2026-09-02
BLITZER ADAM
Chief Operating Officer
$2.94M
@ $212.90 · 2026-09-02
LE-QUOC ALEXIS T
Chief Technology Officer
$4.64M
@ $212.90 · 2026-09-02
LI YANBING
Officer
$2.39M
@ $212.90 · 2026-09-02
GALLOREESE DAVID
Officer
$1.02M
@ $212.90 · 2026-09-02
OBSTLER DAVID M
Chief Financial Officer
$3.52M
@ $212.90 · 2026-09-02
LE-QUOC ALEXIS T
Chief Technology Officer
$12.24M
@ $227.02 · 2026-09-01
GALLOREESE DAVID
Officer
$230,714
@ $232.81 · 2026-09-01
LE-QUOC ALEXIS T
Chief Technology Officer
$9.88M
@ $228.63 · 2026-08-24
POMEL OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$11.08M
@ $235.49 · 2026-08-19
JACOBSON MATTHEW
Director
$15.00M
@ $252.42 · 2026-08-14
LE-QUOC ALEXIS T
Chief Technology Officer
$13.66M
@ $253.36 · 2026-08-10
POMEL OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$36.45M
@ $286.71 · 2026-08-05
POMEL OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$11.52M
@ $244.79 · 2026-07-23
LE-QUOC ALEXIS T
Chief Technology Officer
$11.46M
@ $265.23 · 2026-07-20
POMEL OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$32.93M
@ $259.00 · 2026-07-13
LE-QUOC ALEXIS T
Chief Technology Officer
$13.87M
@ $257.24 · 2026-07-08
LE-QUOC ALEXIS T
Chief Technology Officer
$9.55M
@ $220.97 · 2026-06-22
POMEL OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$19.68M
@ $232.30 · 2026-06-16
ACOCELLA KERRY
General Counsel
$1.26M
@ $233.91 · 2026-06-15
WALTERS SEAN MICHAEL
Officer
$2.74M
@ $231.02 · 2026-06-11
GALLOREESE DAVID
Officer
$918,590
@ $228.90 · 2026-06-09
POMEL OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$29.46M
@ $231.69 · 2026-06-08
OBSTLER DAVID M
Chief Financial Officer
$17.38M
@ $231.69 · 2026-06-08
COLE TITILOPE
Director
$1.27M
@ $247.87 · 2026-06-04
BLITZER ADAM
Chief Operating Officer
$6.69M
@ $258.72 · 2026-06-03
WALTERS SEAN MICHAEL
Officer
$3.58M
@ $267.15 · 2026-06-02
ACOCELLA KERRY
General Counsel
$1.94M
@ $267.15 · 2026-06-02
POMEL OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$6.95M
@ $267.15 · 2026-06-02
LE-QUOC ALEXIS T
Chief Technology Officer
$20.36M
@ $269.94 · 2026-06-02
LI YANBING
Officer
$2.96M
@ $267.15 · 2026-06-02
GALLOREESE DAVID
Officer
$1.26M
@ $267.15 · 2026-06-02
OBSTLER DAVID M
Chief Financial Officer
$4.36M
@ $267.15 · 2026-06-02
JACOBSON MATTHEW
Director
$10.00M
@ $259.10 · 2026-06-01
POMEL OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$18.94M
@ $223.58 · 2026-05-26
LE-QUOC ALEXIS T
Chief Technology Officer
$8.99M
@ $208.04 · 2026-05-18
POMEL OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$25.41M
@ $199.84 · 2026-05-11
JACOBSON MATTHEW
Director
$10.00M
@ $189.28 · 2026-05-08
RICHARDSON JULIE G
Director
$817,253
@ $187.31 · 2026-05-08
LI YANBING
Officer
$3.91M
@ $197.35 · 2026-05-08
WALTERS SEAN MICHAEL
Officer
$1.44M
@ $188.50 · 2026-05-07
ACOCELLA KERRY
General Counsel
$2.08M
@ $150.00 · 2026-05-05
WALTERS SEAN MICHAEL
Officer
$287,100
@ $150.00 · 2026-05-05
LE-QUOC ALEXIS T
Chief Technology Officer
$7.87M
@ $145.95 · 2026-05-05
RICHARDSON JULIE G
Director
$75,300
@ $150.00 · 2026-05-05
LE-QUOC ALEXIS T
Chief Technology Officer
$5.66M
@ $130.84 · 2026-04-22
POMEL OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$4.72M
@ $111.14 · 2026-04-09
LE-QUOC ALEXIS T
Chief Technology Officer
$3.76M
@ $116.46 · 2026-04-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
DDOG
FearGreed
😐Neutral(44/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
DDOG
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (44)
View BAC Full AnalysisView DDOG Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs DDOG

Is Bank of America Corporation or Datadog, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 72.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $180 vs. price $50), compared to DDOG's -967.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $22 vs. $235).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Datadog, Inc.?▼

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while DDOG scores 49/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?▼

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. DDOG scores 11.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Datadog, Inc.?▼

BAC earns 3.8% ROIC versus DDOG's 0.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

BAC vs DDOG: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io