Compare StocksBAC vs CTRA

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. CTRA is overvalued at $33, with an intrinsic value of $29 and a margin of safety of -10%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
CTRA
Coterra Energy Inc.
$32.56

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
CTRA
  • Gross margin of 74.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
CTRA
  • ROIC has declined by 17.0 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Coterra Energy Inc. scores only 22/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • FCF yield of 6.6% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
CTRA
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$1.63B
N/A
FCF Yield
6.61%
13.95
Trailing P/E
15.00
11.13
Forward P/E
10.83
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
8.73%
10.64%
ROE
11.36%
0.00%
Gross Margin
74.63%
1.02
PEG Ratio
44.67
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.21
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.66
1.97%
Dividend Yield
2.70%
BAC: 2Ties: 2CTRA: 4
BACCTRA

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

CTRA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
CTRA
$0.50
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$2.27B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.13B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
CTRA
7.1% Overvalued
Price is 7.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $32.56
Fair Value: $30.40
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

CTRA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $33?

+4.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +5.6%

The market implies +4.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +5.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
CTRA
22/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
CTRA
-2.79
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
CTRA
Insiders 0.9%Institutions 96.6%Retail & Other 2.5%
No. of Institutional Holders1,216
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
CTRA
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
CTRA
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
BELL STEPHEN P
Officer
$2.53M
@ $25.26 · 2025-05-20
BELL STEPHEN P
Officer
$2.65M
@ $23.00 · 2025-05-08
SMITH KEVIN WILLIAM
Chief Technology Officer
$748,444
@ $29.08 · 2025-03-19
VELA ADAM M
General Counsel
$230,120
@ $28.77 · 2025-03-18
SIRGO BLAKE A
Officer
$2.53M
@ $28.13 · 2025-03-17
ROEMER TODD M
Officer
$1.33M
@ $27.68 · 2025-03-14
BELL STEPHEN P
Officer
$2.15M
@ $27.00 · 2025-03-11
DESHAZER MICHAEL D
Officer
$941,913
@ $26.63 · 2025-03-10
BELL STEPHEN P
Officer
$1.95M
@ $26.02 · 2025-03-06
SMITH KEVIN WILLIAM
Chief Technology Officer
$775,461
@ $26.16 · 2024-12-03
VELA ADAM M
General Counsel
$439,801
@ $26.76 · 2024-11-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
CTRA
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
CTRA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
View BAC Full AnalysisView CTRA Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs CTRA

Is Bank of America Corporation or Coterra Energy Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to CTRA's -10.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $29 vs. $33).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Coterra Energy Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while CTRA scores 22/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CTRA scores 2.3 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Coterra Energy Inc.?

CTRA earns 8.7% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Coterra Energy Inc.'s?

CTRA's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). CTRA has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.