Compare StocksBAC vs CSX

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs CSX Corporation (CSX): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, BAC is undervalued at $62, with a DCF intrinsic value of $966181785898 and a margin of safety of 100%. CSX is overvalued at $50, with an intrinsic value of $36 and a margin of safety of -38%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$61.95
VS
CSX
CSX Corporation
$50.40

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
CSX
  • CSX Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.14 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
CSX
  • FCF yield of 2.1% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 29.3x is 57% above the historical average of 18.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.07 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
CSX
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$1.95B
N/A
FCF Yield
2.09%
14.31
Trailing P/E
29.30
11.74
Forward P/E
22.23
Quality & Moat
4.37%
ROIC
13.13%
11.20%
ROE
24.36%
0.00%
Gross Margin
47.07%
1.06
PEG Ratio
2.07
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
1.28
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.64
2.07%
Dividend Yield
1.11%
BAC: 4Ties: 1CSX: 3
BACCSX

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

CSX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$21.88
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
CSX
$0.47
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$7.24B
Δ Market Cap
+$3.41B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $61.95
Fair Value: $966181785897.97
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
CSX
38.2% Overvalued
Price is 38.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $50.40
Fair Value: $36.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

CSX

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $50?

+16.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +22.0%

The market implies +16.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +22.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
CSX
69/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
CSX
-2.69
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.4%Institutions 71.4%Retail & Other 21.1%
No. of Institutional Holders4,431
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
CSX
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 82.1%Retail & Other 17.7%
No. of Institutional Holders2,443
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
CSX
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.03M
ANGEL STEPHEN F
Chief Executive Officer
$1.01M
@ $40.27 · 2026-03-06
ANGEL STEPHEN F
Chief Executive Officer
$2.03M
@ $36.87 · 2025-10-20
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
CSX
4
Sells (3M)
9
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $18.60M
WILLIAMS ANGELA C
Officer
$1.60M
@ $53.29 · 2026-07-24
BURNS MICHAEL S.
Officer
$684,840
@ $52.68 · 2026-07-24
BOONE KEVIN S
Chief Financial Officer
$6.38M
@ $46.70 · 2026-06-03
ZILLMER JOHN J
Director
$464,500
@ $46.45 · 2026-06-03
SORFLEET DIANA B
Officer
$3.74M
@ $41.56 · 2026-02-19
FORTUNE STEPHEN
Chief Technology Officer
$1.22M
@ $38.65 · 2026-02-03
SORFLEET DIANA B
Officer
$2.50M
@ $37.48 · 2026-01-28
BOONE KEVIN S
Officer
$1.12M
@ $36.09 · 2025-10-22
BURNS MICHAEL S.
Officer
$891,393
@ $36.76 · 2025-10-20
FORTUNE STEPHEN
Officer
$47,115
@ $31.41 · 2025-03-04
GOLDMAN NATHAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$4.20M
@ $35.39 · 2024-11-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(72/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
CSX
FearGreed
😏Greed(63/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (72)
CSX
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
View BAC Full AnalysisView CSX Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs CSX

Is Bank of America Corporation or CSX Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $966181785898 vs. price $62), compared to CSX's -38.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $36 vs. $50).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or CSX Corporation?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while CSX scores 69/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CSX scores 2.3 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or CSX Corporation?

CSX earns 13.1% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or CSX Corporation's?

CSX's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). CSX has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

BAC vs CSX: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io