Compare StocksBAC vs CRL

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BAC is undervalued at $58, with a DCF intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of 59%. CRL is overvalued at $282, with an intrinsic value of $0 and a margin of safety of -100%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$57.70
VS
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
$281.65

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.90 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
CRL
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 20.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • PEG ratio of 0.12 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
CRL
  • 10 insider sales totaling $42.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
CRL
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$468.86M
N/A
FCF Yield
3.46%
13.32
Trailing P/E
N/A
10.90
Forward P/E
22.20
Quality & Moat
4.37%
ROIC
8.06%
11.20%
ROE
-7.52%
0.00%
Gross Margin
34.59%
0.90
PEG Ratio
0.12
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.98
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.35
2.21%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
BAC: 3Ties: 1CRL: 3
BACCRL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

CRL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
CRL
$-3.77
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$340.6M
Δ Market Cap
$-1.28B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
59.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $57.70
Fair Value: $142.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
CRL
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $281.65
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

CRL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $282?

+51.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +15.3%

The market implies +51.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
CRL
38/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
CRL
-2.97
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.0%Institutions 71.3%Retail & Other 21.7%
No. of Institutional Holders4,542
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
CRL
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 123.6%
No. of Institutional Holders805
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
CRL
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $4,364
LAPLUME JOSEPH W
Officer
$4,364
@ $174.56 · 2026-03-03
FOSTER JAMES C
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $165.01 · 2025-02-20
GIRSHICK BIRGIT
Chief Operating Officer
$249,250
@ $164.63 · 2025-02-20
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
CRL
10
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $42.61M
FOSTER JAMES C
Director
$10.07M
@ $300.00 · 2026-08-25
PARISOTTO SHANNON M
Officer
$599,711
@ $294.12 · 2026-08-19
ANDREWS NANCY C
Director
$163,443
@ $285.24 · 2026-08-18
GIRSHICK BIRGIT
Chief Executive Officer
$1.82M
@ $279.90 · 2026-08-11
PARISOTTO SHANNON M
Officer
$1.04M
@ $279.66 · 2026-08-11
FOSTER JAMES C
Director
$7.90M
@ $275.00 · 2026-08-10
KNELL MICHAEL GUNNAR
Officer
$1.73M
@ $260.38 · 2026-08-06
CREAMER VICTORIA L
Officer
$1.08M
@ $259.16 · 2026-08-06
PARISOTTO SHANNON M
Officer
$1.33M
@ $263.00 · 2026-08-05
FOSTER JAMES C
Director
$16.88M
@ $225.00 · 2026-06-29
LAPLUME JOSEPH W
Officer
$65,488
@ $163.72 · 2025-08-22
LAPLUME JOSEPH W
Officer
$126,080
@ $157.60 · 2025-08-18
LAPLUME JOSEPH W
Officer
$60,016
@ $150.04 · 2025-08-07
MASSARO GEORGE E
Director
$19,260
@ $137.57 · 2025-05-15
MASSARO GEORGE E
Director
$19,703
@ $140.74 · 2025-05-14
LAPLUME JOSEPH W
Officer
$72,705
@ $145.41 · 2025-05-13
LAPLUME JOSEPH W
Officer
$715,000
@ $162.50 · 2025-02-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(53/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
CRL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(55/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
CRL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
View BAC Full AnalysisView CRL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs CRL

Is Bank of America Corporation or Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 59.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $142 vs. price $58), compared to CRL's -100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $0 vs. $282).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while CRL scores 38/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CRL scores 2.6 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.?

CRL earns 8.1% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.