Compare StocksBAC vs COO

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs The Cooper Companies, Inc. (COO): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. COO is overvalued at $66, with an intrinsic value of $30 and a margin of safety of -116%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
COO
The Cooper Companies, Inc.
$65.91

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
COO
  • Gross margin of 65.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • 10 insider purchases over the past 12 months with a buy/sell ratio above 3:1 — a sustained pattern of insider confidence.
  • PEG ratio of 0.67 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
COO

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    BAC
    COO
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $424.28M
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    3.30%
    13.95
    Trailing P/E
    55.86
    11.13
    Forward P/E
    13.18
    Quality & Moat
    3.89%
    ROIC
    -0.87%
    10.64%
    ROE
    2.85%
    0.00%
    Gross Margin
    65.55%
    1.02
    PEG Ratio
    0.67
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.31
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.92
    1.97%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    BAC: 5Ties: 1COO: 2
    BACCOO

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    BAC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    COO

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    BAC
    $2.37
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $55.63B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$131.83B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    COO
    $-0.23
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $1.06B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-246.1M
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    BAC
    57.9% Margin of Safety
    Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $56.20
    Fair Value: $133.45
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    COO
    116.2% Overvalued
    Price is 116.2% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $65.91
    Fair Value: $30.48
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    BAC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    COO

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $66?

    +17.0%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +15.9%

    The market implies +17.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    BAC
    100/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    COO
    61/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    BAC
    -2.31
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    COO
    -2.49
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    BAC
    Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,373
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    COO
    Insiders 0.6%Institutions 107.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders987
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    BAC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    COO
    0
    Buys (3M)
    10
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.52M
    LUCCHESE CYNTHIA L
    Director
    $149,963
    @ $84.06 · 2025-12-22
    RIVAS MARIA
    Director
    $82,130
    @ $82.13 · 2025-12-18
    KURZIUS LAWRENCE ERIK
    Director
    $165,000
    @ $82.50 · 2025-12-17
    WHITE ALBERT G III
    Chief Executive Officer
    $808,000
    @ $80.80 · 2025-12-16
    SHEFFIELD HOLLY R
    Officer
    $99,322
    @ $80.75 · 2025-12-16
    KURZIUS LAWRENCE ERIK
    Director
    $136,780
    @ $68.39 · 2025-09-29
    WHITE ALBERT G III
    Chief Executive Officer
    $683,900
    @ $68.39 · 2025-09-05
    WARNER GERARD H, III
    Officer
    $100,384
    @ $69.23 · 2025-09-05
    MCBRIDE DANIEL G
    Chief Operating Officer
    $195,120
    @ $65.04 · 2025-09-02
    ANDREWS BRIAN G
    Chief Financial Officer
    $100,162
    @ $65.68 · 2025-09-02
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    BAC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $20.17M
    MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
    Officer
    $4.41M
    @ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
    SCRIVENER THOMAS M
    Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
    BRONSTEIN SHERI B
    Officer
    $2.99M
    @ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
    ATHANASIA DEAN C
    President
    $6.86M
    @ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
    BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.42M
    @ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
    MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
    Officer
    $3.66M
    @ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
    HANS LINDSAY D
    Officer
    $402,410
    @ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    COO
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    WHITE ALBERT G III
    Chief Executive Officer
    $12.71M
    @ $110.53 · 2024-09-19
    RICUPATI AGOSTINO
    Officer
    $172,955
    @ $108.03 · 2024-09-10
    ANDREWS BRIAN G
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.63M
    @ $105.90 · 2024-09-05
    MCBRIDE DANIEL G
    Chief Operating Officer
    $12.13M
    @ $105.48 · 2024-09-04
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    BAC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    COO
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(45/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    BAC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    COO
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
    View BAC Full AnalysisView COO Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs COO

    Is Bank of America Corporation or The Cooper Companies, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to COO's -116.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $30 vs. $66).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or The Cooper Companies, Inc.?

    BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while COO scores 61/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

    BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. COO scores 3.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or The Cooper Companies, Inc.?

    BAC earns 3.9% ROIC versus COO's -0.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    BAC vs COO: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io