Compare Stocks › BAC vs COO

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs The Cooper Companies, Inc. (COO): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, BAC is undervalued at $50, with a DCF intrinsic value of $180 and a margin of safety of 72%. COO is overvalued at $60, with an intrinsic value of $21 and a margin of safety of -190%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$50.01
VS
COO
The Cooper Companies, Inc.
$59.55

Rewards

BAC
  • ★Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.91 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
COO
  • ★Gross margin of 65.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★4 insider purchases totaling $1.9M with no sells in the past 3 months — insiders are putting their own money in.
  • ★Trailing P/E of 20.5x is 58% below the historical average of 48.9x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

BAC
  • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
COO

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    BAC
    COO
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $542.65M
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    4.79%
    11.94
    Trailing P/E
    20.46
    9.64
    Forward P/E
    12.69
    Quality & Moat
    3.80%
    ROIC
    6.26%
    10.73%
    ROE
    6.84%
    0.00%
    Gross Margin
    65.93%
    0.91
    PEG Ratio
    0.56
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.32
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.84
    2.56%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    BAC: 4Ties: 1COO: 3
    BACCOO

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    BAC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    COO

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    BAC
    $2.37
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $55.63B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$131.83B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    COO
    $-0.23
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $1.06B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-246.1M
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    BAC
    72.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 72.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $50.01
    Fair Value: $180.08
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    COO
    189.8% Overvalued
    Price is 189.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $59.55
    Fair Value: $20.55
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    BAC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    COO

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $60?

    +15.6%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +11.1%

    The market implies +15.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +11.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    BAC
    100/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    COO
    61/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    BAC
    -2.31
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    COO
    -2.49
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    BAC
    Insiders 7.1%Institutions 71.9%Retail & Other 21.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,517
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    COO
    Insiders 0.6%Institutions 111.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders967
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    BAC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    COO
    4
    Buys (3M)
    9
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $3.18M
    KURZIUS LAWRENCE ERIK
    Director
    $549,320
    @ $54.93 · 2026-09-16
    KURZIUS LAWRENCE ERIK
    Director
    $539,150
    @ $53.91 · 2026-09-14
    ROSEBROUGH WALTER M JR
    Director
    $541,640
    @ $54.16 · 2026-09-14
    KEEL PAUL A
    Director
    $250,000
    @ $53.18 · 2026-09-11
    LUCCHESE CYNTHIA L
    Director
    $149,963
    @ $84.06 · 2025-12-22
    RIVAS MARIA
    Director
    $82,130
    @ $82.13 · 2025-12-18
    KURZIUS LAWRENCE ERIK
    Director
    $165,000
    @ $82.50 · 2025-12-17
    WHITE ALBERT G III
    Chief Executive Officer
    $808,000
    @ $80.80 · 2025-12-16
    SHEFFIELD HOLLY R
    Officer
    $99,322
    @ $80.75 · 2025-12-16
    KURZIUS LAWRENCE ERIK
    Director
    $136,780
    @ $68.39 · 2025-09-29
    WHITE ALBERT G III
    Chief Executive Officer
    $683,900
    @ $68.39 · 2025-09-05
    WARNER GERARD H, III
    Officer
    $100,384
    @ $69.23 · 2025-09-05
    MCBRIDE DANIEL G
    Chief Operating Officer
    $195,120
    @ $65.04 · 2025-09-02
    ANDREWS BRIAN G
    Chief Financial Officer
    $100,162
    @ $65.68 · 2025-09-02
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    BAC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $20.17M
    MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
    Officer
    $4.41M
    @ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
    SCRIVENER THOMAS M
    Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
    BRONSTEIN SHERI B
    Officer
    $2.99M
    @ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
    ATHANASIA DEAN C
    President
    $6.86M
    @ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
    BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.42M
    @ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    COO
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    BAC
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(39/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    COO
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(43/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    BAC
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
    COO
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (43)
    View BAC Full AnalysisView COO Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs COO

    Is Bank of America Corporation or The Cooper Companies, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 72.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $180 vs. price $50), compared to COO's -189.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $21 vs. $60).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or The Cooper Companies, Inc.?▼

    BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while COO scores 61/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?▼

    BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. COO scores 3.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or The Cooper Companies, Inc.?▼

    COO earns 6.3% ROIC versus BAC's 3.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    BAC vs COO: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io