Compare StocksBAC vs CI

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs The Cigna Group (CI): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, BAC is undervalued at $62, with a DCF intrinsic value of $966181785898 and a margin of safety of 100%. CI is undervalued at $279, with an intrinsic value of $602 and a margin of safety of 54%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$61.95
VS
CI
The Cigna Group
$279.05

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
CI
  • Share count has been reduced by 12% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • FCF yield of 10.8% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • Trailing P/E of 11.5x is 30% below the historical average of 16.5x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.14 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
CI
  • Gross margin of 9.1% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Insiders have sold $59.4M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
CI
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$7.98B
N/A
FCF Yield
10.82%
14.31
Trailing P/E
11.54
11.74
Forward P/E
8.33
Quality & Moat
4.37%
ROIC
11.89%
11.20%
ROE
16.76%
0.00%
Gross Margin
9.14%
1.06
PEG Ratio
0.83
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.57
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.93
2.07%
Dividend Yield
2.24%
BAC: 0Ties: 1CI: 7
BACCI

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

CI

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$21.88
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
CI
$-2.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$9.93B
Δ Market Cap
$-26.45B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $61.95
Fair Value: $966181785897.97
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
CI
53.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 53.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $279.05
Fair Value: $602.09
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

CI

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $279?

+1.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.1%

The market implies +1.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
CI
54/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
CI
-2.32
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.4%Institutions 71.4%Retail & Other 21.1%
No. of Institutional Holders4,431
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
CI
Insiders 1.4%Institutions 92.8%Retail & Other 5.8%
No. of Institutional Holders2,220
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
CI
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $999,916
CORDANI DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$999,916
@ $241.88 · 2025-11-03
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
CI
2
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $70.71M
KATES JAMIE G
Officer
$268,452
@ $298.61 · 2026-06-12
CORDANI DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$59.11M
@ $292.82 · 2026-05-12
JONES NICOLE S.
Officer
$666,515
@ $288.91 · 2026-03-02
NEVILLE EVERETT
Officer
$496,636
@ $288.91 · 2026-03-02
EVANKO BRIAN C
President
$1.61M
@ $300.00 · 2025-10-03
JONES NICOLE S.
General Counsel
$8.56M
@ $300.00 · 2025-08-15
GRANGER ELDER
Director
$737,392
@ $310.35 · 2025-03-14
EDER NOELLE K
Officer
$3.18M
@ $320.00 · 2025-03-07
CORDANI DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$8.17M
@ $308.12 · 2025-03-03
JONES NICOLE S.
Officer
$1.51M
@ $308.12 · 2025-03-03
DELANEY WILLIAM J.
Director
$922,152
@ $342.68 · 2024-08-19
TRIPLETT MICHAEL W
Officer
$2.25M
@ $329.94 · 2024-08-12
JONES NICOLE S.
General Counsel
$7.29M
@ $330.96 · 2024-08-12
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(72/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
CI
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (72)
CI
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
View BAC Full AnalysisView CI Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs CI

Is Bank of America Corporation or The Cigna Group more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $966181785898 vs. price $62), compared to CI's 53.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $602 vs. $279).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or The Cigna Group?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while CI scores 54/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CI scores 2.6 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or The Cigna Group?

CI earns 11.9% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or The Cigna Group's?

CI's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). CI has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

BAC vs CI: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io