Compare StocksBAC vs C

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Citigroup Inc. (C): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BAC is undervalued at $58, with a DCF intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of 59%. C is undervalued at $133, with an intrinsic value of $415 and a margin of safety of 68%. Of the two, C has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$57.90
VS
C
Citigroup Inc.
$132.95

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.90 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
C
  • Citigroup Inc. scores 83/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.60 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
C
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.20 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
C
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
N/A
N/A
FCF Yield
N/A
13.37
Trailing P/E
14.33
10.94
Forward P/E
10.32
Quality & Moat
4.37%
ROIC
2.65%
11.20%
ROE
8.53%
0.00%
Gross Margin
0.00%
0.90
PEG Ratio
0.60
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
2.21%
Dividend Yield
2.02%
BAC: 4Ties: 1C: 3
BACC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

C

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
C
$5.69
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$20.43B
Δ Market Cap
+$116.31B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
59.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $57.90
Fair Value: $142.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
C
68.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 68.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $132.95
Fair Value: $415.17
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

C

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
C
83/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
C
-2.11
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.0%Institutions 71.3%Retail & Other 21.7%
No. of Institutional Holders4,542
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
C
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 82.1%Retail & Other 17.6%
No. of Institutional Holders3,414
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
C
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
C
0
Sells (3M)
8
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $15.56M
DUGAN JOHN CUNNINGHAM
Director
$265,260
@ $125.30 · 2026-05-08
GILES NICOLE M.
Officer
$1.68M
@ $131.80 · 2026-04-15
SKYLER EDWARD
Officer
$3.29M
@ $131.41 · 2026-04-15
MASON MARK A.L.
Chief Financial Officer
$416,045
@ $114.71 · 2026-02-20
LUCHETTI GONZALO
Officer
$2.30M
@ $115.03 · 2026-02-12
HABNER PAMELA
Officer
$3.49M
@ $117.26 · 2026-02-12
GARG SUNIL
Officer
$2.13M
@ $118.49 · 2026-02-11
GILES NICOLE M.
Officer
$2.00M
@ $119.04 · 2026-02-11
HENRY PETER B
Director
$271,209
@ $90.40 · 2025-07-16
DUGAN JOHN CUNNINGHAM
Director
$301,493
@ $68.26 · 2025-04-30
MASON MARK A.L.
Chief Financial Officer
$4.86M
@ $83.21 · 2025-02-14
SKYLER EDWARD
Officer
$2.93M
@ $82.41 · 2025-02-14
SELVAKESARI ANAND
Chief Operating Officer
$2.43M
@ $81.10 · 2025-02-13
MCINTOSH BRENT
Officer
$1.62M
@ $81.22 · 2025-02-13
LUCHETTI GONZALO
Officer
$1.33M
@ $81.36 · 2025-02-13
KHALIQ SYED SHAHMIR
Officer
$2.45M
@ $81.70 · 2025-02-13
WECHTER SARA
Officer
$1.23M
@ $81.01 · 2025-02-13
HENRY PETER B
Director
$909,675
@ $69.97 · 2024-11-11
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
C
FearGreed
😐Neutral(60/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
C
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
View BAC Full AnalysisView C Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs C

Is Bank of America Corporation or Citigroup Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, C trades at a 68.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $415 vs. price $133), compared to BAC's 59.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $142 vs. $58).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Citigroup Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while C scores 83/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Citigroup Inc. in financial distress?

C's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. BAC scores 0.2 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Citigroup Inc.?

BAC earns 4.4% ROIC versus C's 2.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Citigroup Inc.'s?

C's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). C has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

BAC vs C: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io