Compare StocksBAC vs BX

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Blackstone Inc. (BX): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BAC is undervalued at $58, with a DCF intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of 59%. BX is fairly valued at $125, with an intrinsic value of $130 and a margin of safety of 4%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$57.73
VS
BX
Blackstone Inc.
$124.81

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.90 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
BX
  • Gross margin of 100.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • Trailing P/E of 27.9x is 41% below the historical average of 47.5x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
BX
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — share issuance is offsetting repurchases.
  • Insiders have sold $12.1M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 9.3% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
BX
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
N/A
N/A
FCF Yield
N/A
13.33
Trailing P/E
27.92
10.91
Forward P/E
16.67
Quality & Moat
4.37%
ROIC
17.62%
11.20%
ROE
31.37%
0.00%
Gross Margin
100.00%
0.90
PEG Ratio
1.13
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.56
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
2.21%
Dividend Yield
4.24%
BAC: 3Ties: 1BX: 4
BACBX

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

BX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BX
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-7.52B
Δ Market Cap
+$65.62B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
59.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $57.73
Fair Value: $142.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BX
4.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 4.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $124.81
Fair Value: $130.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

BX

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
BX
63/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BX
-2.52
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.0%Institutions 71.3%Retail & Other 21.7%
No. of Institutional Holders4,542
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BX
Insiders 1.1%Institutions 73.7%Retail & Other 25.2%
No. of Institutional Holders2,724
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BX
0
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $4.17M
PORAT RUTH M
Director
$53,974
@ $123.23 · 2026-05-11
PORAT RUTH M
Director
$68,553
@ $130.83 · 2026-02-17
PORAT RUTH M
Director
$58,835
@ $146.36 · 2025-11-10
BREYER JAMES W
Director
$2.00M
@ $143.86 · 2025-11-04
BREYER JAMES W
Director
$1.99M
@ $151.23 · 2025-10-29
PORAT RUTH M
Director
$46,699
@ $170.43 · 2025-08-11
PORAT RUTH M
Director
$40,342
@ $136.75 · 2025-05-05
PORAT RUTH M
Director
$61,926
@ $165.14 · 2025-02-18
PORAT RUTH M
Director
$36,799
@ $169.58 · 2024-11-04
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BX
3
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $35.70M
PAYNE DAVID
Officer
$1.38M
@ $145.23 · 2026-08-11
FINLEY JOHN G
Officer
$6.62M
@ $147.11 · 2026-08-11
SAWHNEY VIKRANT
Officer
$4.07M
@ $135.55 · 2026-08-04
SAWHNEY VIKRANT
Officer
$3.78M
@ $125.79 · 2026-05-01
BARATTA JOSEPH P
Director
$19.85M
@ $175.69 · 2025-09-25
FINLEY JOHN G
Officer
$3.69M
@ $171.46 · 2025-09-08
SAWHNEY VIKRANT
Officer
$8.83M
@ $173.64 · 2025-08-14
PAYNE DAVID
Officer
$1.60M
@ $169.97 · 2025-08-07
BARATTA JOSEPH P
Director
$16.74M
@ $167.36 · 2025-08-05
FINLEY JOHN G
Officer
$3.46M
@ $138.47 · 2025-05-08
FINLEY JOHN G
Officer
$7.43M
@ $175.94 · 2024-11-07
BARATTA JOSEPH P
Director
$17.56M
@ $150.81 · 2024-10-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(53/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BX
FearGreed
😨Fear(33/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
BX
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)
View BAC Full AnalysisView BX Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs BX

Is Bank of America Corporation or Blackstone Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 59.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $142 vs. price $58), compared to BX's 4.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $130 vs. $125).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Blackstone Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while BX scores 63/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. BX scores 3.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Blackstone Inc.?

BX earns 17.6% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Blackstone Inc.'s?

BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to BX's 21/100 (Unsafe). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.