Compare StocksBAC vs BKR

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Baker Hughes Company (BKR): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, BAC is undervalued at $62, with a DCF intrinsic value of $966181785898 and a margin of safety of 100%. BKR is undervalued at $60, with an intrinsic value of $102 and a margin of safety of 41%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$61.95
VS
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
$60.49

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
BKR
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 41.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $6.96 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -0.2x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.14 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
BKR
  • Gross margin of 23.7% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 7.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 2.08 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
BKR
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$4.42B
N/A
FCF Yield
7.35%
14.31
Trailing P/E
19.45
11.74
Forward P/E
19.00
Quality & Moat
4.37%
ROIC
7.73%
11.20%
ROE
16.46%
0.00%
Gross Margin
23.66%
1.06
PEG Ratio
2.08
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.16
2.07%
Dividend Yield
1.52%
BAC: 4Ties: 1BKR: 3
BACBKR

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

BKR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$21.88
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BKR
$3.06
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.98B
Δ Market Cap
+$15.23B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $61.95
Fair Value: $966181785897.97
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BKR
48.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 48.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $60.49
Fair Value: $116.69
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

BKR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $60?

+9.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +2.3%

The market implies +9.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +2.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
BKR
67/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BKR
-2.67
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.4%Institutions 71.4%Retail & Other 21.1%
No. of Institutional Holders4,431
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BKR
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 99.6%Retail & Other 0.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,632
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BKR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BKR
5
Sells (3M)
18
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $73.53M
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$3.96M
@ $55.05 · 2026-07-01
SIMONELLI LORENZO
Chief Executive Officer
$10.60M
@ $58.43 · 2026-06-22
SIMONELLI LORENZO
Chief Executive Officer
$11.49M
@ $63.36 · 2026-06-12
CHARLTON REBECCA L
Officer
$326,751
@ $64.22 · 2026-06-03
APOSTOLIDES JAMES E
Officer
$814,376
@ $66.42 · 2026-05-19
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$3.30M
@ $54.47 · 2026-03-16
SIMONELLI LORENZO
Chief Executive Officer
$16.03M
@ $58.79 · 2026-03-11
MAGNO MARIA GEORGIA
Officer
$298,920
@ $59.04 · 2026-03-11
SIMONELLI LORENZO
Chief Executive Officer
$16.66M
@ $61.13 · 2026-03-04
APOSTOLIDES JAMES E
Officer
$1.54M
@ $59.74 · 2026-02-10
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$3.22M
@ $59.11 · 2026-02-09
MAGNO MARIA GEORGIA
Officer
$1.13M
@ $59.11 · 2026-02-09
CHARLTON REBECCA L
Officer
$158,198
@ $55.94 · 2026-02-03
CHARLTON REBECCA L
Officer
$13,222
@ $47.56 · 2025-11-13
RAMASWAMY SREEGANESH
Officer
$1.25M
@ $50.00 · 2025-09-23
APOSTOLIDES JAMES E
Officer
$310,800
@ $50.00 · 2025-09-23
CHARLTON REBECCA L
Officer
$50,000
@ $50.00 · 2025-09-23
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$2.36M
@ $46.89 · 2025-09-10
CHARLTON REBECCA L
Officer
$22,500
@ $45.00 · 2025-07-24
SIMONELLI LORENZO
Chief Executive Officer
$23.39M
@ $44.42 · 2025-07-23
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$223,400
@ $40.00 · 2025-06-17
CHARLTON REBECCA L
Officer
$232,440
@ $38.74 · 2025-06-12
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$2.08M
@ $38.24 · 2025-06-09
APOSTOLIDES JAMES E
Officer
$138,662
@ $36.49 · 2025-05-07
APOSTOLIDES JAMES E
Officer
$196,699
@ $42.21 · 2025-03-07
APOSTOLIDES JAMES E
Officer
$358,319
@ $46.65 · 2025-02-12
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$3.28M
@ $43.62 · 2025-01-28
SIMONELLI LORENZO
Chief Executive Officer
$4.00M
@ $35.00 · 2024-08-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(72/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BKR
FearGreed
😐Neutral(56/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (72)
BKR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
View BAC Full AnalysisView BKR Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs BKR

Is Bank of America Corporation or Baker Hughes Company more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $966181785898 vs. price $62), compared to BKR's 40.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $102 vs. $60).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Baker Hughes Company?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while BKR scores 67/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. BKR scores 2.2 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Baker Hughes Company?

BKR earns 7.7% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Baker Hughes Company's?

BKR's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). BKR has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

BAC vs BKR: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io