Compare StocksBA vs SBUX

The Boeing Company (BA) vs Starbucks Corporation (SBUX)

BA
The Boeing Company
$201.18
VS
SBUX
Starbucks Corporation
$95.83

Rewards

BA
    SBUX
    • Starbucks Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Starbucks Corporation scores 71/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Dividend yield of 2.59% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.

    Risks

    BA
    • Gross margin of 4.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • The Boeing Company scores only 23/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 31% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    SBUX
    • Gross margin of 22.2% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Trailing P/E of 79.9x is 127% above the historical average of 35.2x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.1x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    BA
    SBUX
    Valuation
    $1.76B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-1.44B
    1.11%
    FCF Yield
    -1.32%
    81.45
    Trailing P/E
    79.86
    42.77
    Forward P/E
    32.45
    Quality & Moat
    -3.63%
    ROIC
    10.82%
    34.63%
    ROE
    N/A
    4.83%
    Gross Margin
    22.17%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    10.33
    Debt / Equity
    N/A
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    4.13
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    2.59%
    BA: 2Ties: 2SBUX: 3
    BASBUX

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    BA

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    SBUX

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    BA
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-12.13B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$56.54B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    SBUX
    $-9.28
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $1.95B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-18.13B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    BA
    17.3% Overvalued
    Price is 17.3% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $201.18
    Fair Value: $171.52
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    SBUX
    1.6% Overvalued
    Price is 1.6% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $95.83
    Fair Value: $94.35
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    BA

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $201?

    +27.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +30.7%
    SBUX

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    BA
    23/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    SBUX
    71/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    BA
    -3.01
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    SBUX
    -2.77
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    BA
    Insiders 0.0%Institutions 73.9%Retail & Other 26.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,009
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    SBUX
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.8%Retail & Other 15.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,899
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    BA
    1
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.10M
    BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
    Director
    $499,966
    @ $224.20 · 2026-03-03
    DEASY DANA S
    Officer
    $99,102
    @ $178.88 · 2025-11-24
    BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
    Director
    $497,420
    @ $226.10 · 2025-08-19
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    SBUX
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $994,500
    KNUDSTORP JORGEN VIG
    Director
    $994,500
    @ $85.00 · 2025-11-10
    KNUDSTORP JORGEN VIG
    Director
    $34,770
    @ $91.50 · 2024-09-06
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    BA
    4
    Sells (3M)
    12
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $11.64M
    AMULURU UMA M
    Officer
    $351,484
    @ $233.85 · 2026-02-24
    SCHMIDT ANN M
    Officer
    $1.53M
    @ $243.37 · 2026-02-17
    MCKENZIE HOWARD E
    Officer
    $2.46M
    @ $234.01 · 2026-02-05
    AMULURU UMA M
    Officer
    $644,598
    @ $236.03 · 2026-02-04
    AMULURU UMA M
    Officer
    $270,009
    @ $197.66 · 2025-11-06
    RAYMOND DAVID CHRISTOPHER
    Officer
    $867,069
    @ $229.99 · 2025-08-08
    NELSON BRENDAN J.
    President
    $132,019
    @ $206.28 · 2025-05-15
    SHOCKEY JEFFREY S
    Officer
    $650,198
    @ $202.87 · 2025-05-13
    CLEARY MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $558,009
    @ $186.00 · 2025-05-06
    RAYMOND DAVID CHRISTOPHER
    Officer
    $729,164
    @ $187.01 · 2025-05-02
    POPE STEPHANIE F
    Officer
    $3.08M
    @ $183.78 · 2025-05-01
    CLEARY MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $368,018
    @ $184.01 · 2025-05-01
    CLEARY MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $268,530
    @ $179.02 · 2025-02-26
    AMULURU UMA M
    Officer
    $570,759
    @ $180.73 · 2025-02-20
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    SBUX
    3
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $460,974
    BREWER BRADY
    Officer
    $58,800
    @ $100.00 · 2026-03-09
    KELLY SARA
    Officer
    $242,800
    @ $97.12 · 2026-03-05
    BREWER BRADY
    Officer
    $159,374
    @ $97.12 · 2026-03-05
    KELLY SARA
    Officer
    $1.94M
    @ $101.37 · 2024-11-29
    RUGGERI RACHEL
    Chief Financial Officer
    $148,414
    @ $99.54 · 2024-11-21
    RUGGERI RACHEL
    Chief Financial Officer
    $143,850
    @ $99.07 · 2024-11-15
    CONWAY MICHAEL AARON
    Officer
    $305,598
    @ $94.03 · 2024-08-15
    RUGGERI RACHEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $299,916
    @ $91.16 · 2024-08-13
    CONWAY MICHAEL AARON
    Officer
    $260,000
    @ $80.00 · 2024-06-14
    RUGGERI RACHEL
    Chief Financial Officer
    $300,000
    @ $80.00 · 2024-05-22
    KELLY SARA
    Officer
    $19,375
    @ $77.50 · 2024-05-21
    KELLY SARA
    Officer
    $22,000
    @ $88.00 · 2024-04-22
    CONWAY MICHAEL AARON
    Officer
    $277,518
    @ $85.39 · 2024-04-15
    KELLY SARA
    Officer
    $23,158
    @ $92.63 · 2024-03-21
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    BA
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(46/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    SBUX
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(55/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    BA
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (46)
    SBUX
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
    View BA Full AnalysisView SBUX Full Analysis
    The Boeing Company (BA) vs Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io