Compare Stocks › BA vs MRK

The Boeing Company (BA) vs Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, BA is fairly valued at $172, with a DCF intrinsic value of $179 and a margin of safety of 4%. MRK is undervalued at $150, with an intrinsic value of $596 and a margin of safety of 75%. Of the two, MRK has the wider margin of safety.

BA
The Boeing Company
$171.55
VS
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
$149.52

Rewards

BA
    MRK
    • ★Gross margin of 76.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.94 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
    • ★Management has timed buybacks well — 2 out of 3 years showed value-accretive repurchases.

    Risks

    BA
    • ⚠Gross margin of 9.4% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • ⚠The Boeing Company scores only 23/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • ⚠Share count has increased by 31% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    MRK
    • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.82 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • ⚠7 insider sales totaling $30.0M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
    • ⚠Free cash flow has declined at a 5.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    BA
    MRK
    Valuation
    $4.72B
    Free Cash Flow
    N/A
    3.47%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    17.70
    Trailing P/E
    151.03
    68.39
    Forward P/E
    16.44
    Quality & Moat
    0.41%
    ROIC
    22.88%
    28.80%
    ROE
    43.48%
    9.45%
    Gross Margin
    76.91%
    1.51
    PEG Ratio
    2.82
    Balance Sheet Safety
    4.24
    Net Debt / Equity
    1.11
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    13.81
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.93
    0.00%
    Dividend Yield
    2.27%
    BA: 2Ties: 1MRK: 7
    BAMRK

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    BA

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    MRK

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    BA
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-12.13B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$56.54B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    MRK
    $-1.72
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $12.28B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-21.09B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    BA
    4.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 4.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $171.55
    Fair Value: $179.15
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    MRK
    74.9% Margin of Safety
    Price is 74.9% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $149.52
    Fair Value: $596.15
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    BA

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $172?

    +25.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +15.2%
    MRK

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    BA
    23/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    MRK
    68/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    BA

    Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

    MRK
    -2.31
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    BA
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.6%Retail & Other 23.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,111
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    MRK
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 82.9%Retail & Other 17.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,903
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    BA
    0
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $898,413
    TILDEN BRADLEY DOUGLAS
    Director
    $299,345
    @ $218.50 · 2026-05-20
    BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
    Director
    $499,966
    @ $224.20 · 2026-03-03
    DEASY DANA S
    Officer
    $99,102
    @ $178.88 · 2025-11-24
    BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
    Director
    $497,420
    @ $226.10 · 2025-08-19
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    MRK
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    THULIN INGE G
    Director
    $250,000
    @ $88.28 · 2025-02-06
    BAKER DOUGLAS M JR
    Director
    $1.33M
    @ $88.50 · 2025-02-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    BA
    0
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $5.25M
    AMULURU UMA M
    Officer
    $351,484
    @ $233.85 · 2026-02-24
    SCHMIDT ANN M
    Officer
    $1.53M
    @ $243.37 · 2026-02-17
    MCKENZIE HOWARD E
    Officer
    $2.46M
    @ $234.01 · 2026-02-05
    AMULURU UMA M
    Officer
    $644,598
    @ $236.03 · 2026-02-04
    AMULURU UMA M
    Officer
    $270,009
    @ $197.66 · 2025-11-06
    RAYMOND DAVID CHRISTOPHER
    Officer
    $867,069
    @ $229.99 · 2025-08-08
    NELSON BRENDAN J.
    President
    $132,019
    @ $206.28 · 2025-05-15
    SHOCKEY JEFFREY S
    Officer
    $650,198
    @ $202.87 · 2025-05-13
    CLEARY MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $558,009
    @ $186.00 · 2025-05-06
    RAYMOND DAVID CHRISTOPHER
    Officer
    $729,164
    @ $187.01 · 2025-05-02
    POPE STEPHANIE F
    Officer
    $3.08M
    @ $183.78 · 2025-05-01
    CLEARY MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $368,018
    @ $184.01 · 2025-05-01
    CLEARY MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $268,530
    @ $179.02 · 2025-02-26
    AMULURU UMA M
    Officer
    $570,759
    @ $180.73 · 2025-02-20
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    MRK
    7
    Sells (3M)
    21
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $72.01M
    GUINDO CHIRFI
    Officer
    $1.35M
    @ $135.00 · 2026-08-13
    ZACHARY JENNIFER L
    General Counsel
    $10.72M
    @ $133.46 · 2026-08-12
    DELUCA RICHARD ROBERT JR.
    Officer
    $5.94M
    @ $131.12 · 2026-08-12
    GUINDO CHIRFI
    Officer
    $1.97M
    @ $131.00 · 2026-08-06
    DELUCA RICHARD ROBERT JR.
    Officer
    $788,773
    @ $130.38 · 2026-08-06
    MARALDO DAVID R.
    Officer
    $2.41M
    @ $128.72 · 2026-08-05
    WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
    Chief Technology Officer
    $6.81M
    @ $128.77 · 2026-08-05
    GUINDO CHIRFI
    Officer
    $1.21M
    @ $121.46 · 2026-02-12
    LI DEAN Y
    Officer
    $1.20M
    @ $117.52 · 2026-02-10
    ZACHARY JENNIFER L
    General Counsel
    $14.49M
    @ $119.15 · 2026-02-09
    GUINDO CHIRFI
    Officer
    $1.18M
    @ $118.41 · 2026-02-09
    OOSTHUIZEN JOHANNES JACOBUS
    Officer
    $1.83M
    @ $121.87 · 2026-02-06
    WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
    Chief Technology Officer
    $609,525
    @ $121.91 · 2026-02-06
    DELUCA RICHARD ROBERT JR.
    Officer
    $4.56M
    @ $120.92 · 2026-02-06
    GUINDO CHIRFI
    Officer
    $2.44M
    @ $121.88 · 2026-02-05
    SMART DALTON E. III
    Officer
    $765,920
    @ $119.67 · 2026-02-04
    LITCHFIELD CAROLINE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $5.02M
    @ $119.61 · 2026-02-04
    LI DEAN Y
    Officer
    $1.79M
    @ $118.77 · 2026-02-04
    DAVIS ROBERT M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.60M
    @ $118.04 · 2026-02-04
    DOWNING CRISTAL N.
    Officer
    $616,395
    @ $87.00 · 2025-11-10
    WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
    Chief Technology Officer
    $720,040
    @ $83.59 · 2025-11-03
    SMART DALTON E. III
    Officer
    $352,723
    @ $82.76 · 2025-04-25
    OOSTHUIZEN JOHANNES JACOBUS
    Officer
    $714,745
    @ $84.09 · 2025-02-19
    WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
    Chief Technology Officer
    $512,057
    @ $85.34 · 2025-02-13
    DOWNING CRISTAL N.
    Officer
    $209,551
    @ $88.76 · 2025-02-06
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    BA
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(27/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    MRK
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(65/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    BA
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (27)
    MRK
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
    View BA Full AnalysisView MRK Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: BA vs MRK

    Is The Boeing Company or Merck & Co., Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, MRK trades at a 74.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $596 vs. price $150), compared to BA's 4.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $179 vs. $172).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, The Boeing Company or Merck & Co., Inc.?▼

    MRK scores 68/100 (Narrow moat), while BA scores 23/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is The Boeing Company in financial distress?▼

    BA's Altman Z-Score of 1.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MRK scores 3.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, The Boeing Company or Merck & Co., Inc.?▼

    MRK earns 22.9% ROIC versus BA's 0.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, The Boeing Company's or Merck & Co., Inc.'s?▼

    MRK's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to BA's 70/100 (Safe). MRK has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.