SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › BA vs LMT

The Boeing Company (BA) vs Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)

BA
The Boeing Company
$227.38
VS
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
$512.77

Rewards

BA
    LMT
    • ★Lockheed Martin Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • ★Lockheed Martin Corporation scores 74/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

    Risks

    BA
    • ⚠Gross margin of 4.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • ⚠The Boeing Company scores only 23/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • ⚠Share count has increased by 31% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    LMT
    • ⚠Gross margin of 9.9% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • ⚠FCF yield of 5.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • ⚠High leverage (2.76x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    BA
    LMT
    Valuation
    $2.55B
    Free Cash Flow
    $6.91B
    1.43%
    FCF Yield
    5.84%
    90.23
    Trailing P/E
    24.82
    53.02
    Forward P/E
    15.97
    Quality & Moat
    2.25%
    ROIC
    23.16%
    31.57%
    ROE
    66.99%
    4.82%
    Gross Margin
    9.91%
    24.63
    PEG Ratio
    1.08
    Balance Sheet Safety
    8.29
    Debt / Equity
    2.76
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.35
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    2.63%
    BA: 0Ties: 1LMT: 9
    BALMT

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    BA

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    LMT

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    BA
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-12.13B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$56.54B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    LMT
    $-1.60
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $8.03B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-12.81B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    BA
    34.7% Overvalued
    Price is 34.7% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $227.38
    Fair Value: $168.79
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    LMT
    35.6% Overvalued
    Price is 35.6% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $512.77
    Fair Value: $378.20
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    BA

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $227?

    +28.9%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +27.0%
    LMT

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $513?

    +11.9%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +7.6%

    The market implies +11.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    BA
    23/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    LMT
    74/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    BA
    -3.01
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    LMT
    -2.23
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    BA
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 73.4%Retail & Other 26.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,007
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    LMT
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 75.0%Retail & Other 24.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,257
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    BA
    1
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.10M
    BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
    Director
    $499,966
    @ $224.20 · 2026-03-03
    DEASY DANA S
    Officer
    $99,102
    @ $178.88 · 2025-11-24
    BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
    Director
    $497,420
    @ $226.10 · 2025-08-19
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    LMT
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    BA
    4
    Sells (3M)
    9
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.46M
    AMULURU UMA M
    Officer
    $351,484
    @ $233.85 · 2026-02-24
    SCHMIDT ANN M
    Officer
    $1.53M
    @ $243.37 · 2026-02-17
    MCKENZIE HOWARD E
    Officer
    $2.46M
    @ $234.01 · 2026-02-05
    AMULURU UMA M
    Officer
    $644,598
    @ $236.03 · 2026-02-04
    AMULURU UMA M
    Officer
    $270,009
    @ $197.66 · 2025-11-06
    RAYMOND DAVID CHRISTOPHER
    Officer
    $867,069
    @ $229.99 · 2025-08-08
    NELSON BRENDAN J.
    President
    $132,019
    @ $206.28 · 2025-05-15
    SHOCKEY JEFFREY S
    Officer
    $650,198
    @ $202.87 · 2025-05-13
    CLEARY MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $558,009
    @ $186.00 · 2025-05-06
    RAYMOND DAVID CHRISTOPHER
    Officer
    $729,164
    @ $187.01 · 2025-05-02
    POPE STEPHANIE F
    Officer
    $3.08M
    @ $183.78 · 2025-05-01
    CLEARY MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $368,018
    @ $184.01 · 2025-05-01
    CLEARY MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $268,530
    @ $179.02 · 2025-02-26
    AMULURU UMA M
    Officer
    $570,759
    @ $180.73 · 2025-02-20
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    LMT
    3
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $10.29M
    CAHILL TIMOTHY S
    Officer
    $3.00M
    @ $649.47 · 2026-03-11
    ULMER GREGORY M
    Officer
    $1.87M
    @ $658.08 · 2026-02-27
    HILL STEPHANIE C
    Officer
    $1.59M
    @ $660.64 · 2026-02-24
    ST JOHN FRANK A
    Chief Operating Officer
    $3.83M
    @ $491.04 · 2025-10-23
    PAUL HARRY EDWARD III
    Officer
    $312,923
    @ $442.61 · 2025-02-26
    HILL STEPHANIE C
    Officer
    $2.12M
    @ $442.51 · 2025-02-26
    LIGHTFOOT ROBERT M JR
    Officer
    $1.42M
    @ $442.42 · 2025-02-26
    HILL STEPHANIE C
    Officer
    $1.78M
    @ $542.72 · 2024-08-01
    CAHILL TIMOTHY S
    Officer
    $2.05M
    @ $515.36 · 2024-07-24
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    BA
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(60/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    LMT
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(39/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    BA
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
    LMT
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
    View BA Full AnalysisView LMT Full Analysis
    BA vs LMT: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io