Compare StocksAZO vs ORCL

AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL)

AZO
AutoZone, Inc.
$3341.58
VS
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
$155.52

Rewards

AZO
  • AutoZone, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • AutoZone, Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Share count has been reduced by 13% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
ORCL
  • Oracle Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 67.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Oracle Corporation scores 71/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

AZO
  • Insiders have sold $34.2M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 11.0% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
ORCL
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • High leverage (4.15x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.5x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AZO
ORCL
Valuation
$1.79B
Free Cash Flow
$-22.30B
3.24%
FCF Yield
-4.99%
23.42
Trailing P/E
27.92
19.13
Forward P/E
19.51
Quality & Moat
19.90%
ROIC
8.22%
N/A
ROE
31.86%
52.15%
Gross Margin
67.08%
N/A
PEG Ratio
1.14
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Debt / Equity
4.15
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.92
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.48
N/A
Dividend Yield
1.29%
AZO: 5Ties: 2ORCL: 1
AZOORCL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AZO

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

ORCL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AZO
$1.22
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$7.69B
Δ Market Cap
+$9.35B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ORCL
$17.69
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$18.61B
Δ Market Cap
+$329.28B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AZO
33.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 33.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $3341.58
Fair Value: $5036.42
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ORCL
235.9% Overvalued
Price is 235.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $155.52
Fair Value: $46.30
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AZO

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $3342?

+11.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +16.3%

The market implies +11.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +16.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

ORCL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AZO
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
ORCL
71/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AZO
-2.36
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ORCL
-2.57
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AZO
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 94.4%Retail & Other 5.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,851
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ORCL
Insiders 40.5%Institutions 44.3%Retail & Other 15.1%
No. of Institutional Holders4,769
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AZO
1
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.18M
GEORGE MICHAEL A
Director
$492,729
@ $3398.13 · 2025-12-22
HANNASCH BRIAN
Director
$498,784
@ $3393.09 · 2025-12-18
JACKSON JAMERE
Chief Financial Officer
$187,742
@ $3413.49 · 2025-12-10
BEDSOLE JENNA M
Officer
$99,256
@ $2757.11 · 2024-05-23
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ORCL
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $112,258
FAIRHEAD RONA ALISON
Director
$112,258
@ $233.87 · 2025-07-07
MOORMAN CHARLES W IV
Director
$947,913
@ $172.35 · 2025-02-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AZO
4
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $214.37M
SMITH RICHARD CRAIG
Officer
$21.87M
@ $3700.00 · 2026-01-23
SMITH RICHARD CRAIG
Officer
$11.16M
@ $3500.00 · 2026-01-16
GRAVES EARL G JR
Director
$823,750
@ $3295.00 · 2026-01-02
MRKONIC GEORGE R JR
Director
$323,538
@ $3370.19 · 2026-01-02
BORNINKHOF MICHELLE K
Chief Technology Officer
$1.13M
@ $3775.00 · 2025-10-27
DANIELE PHILIP B. III
Chief Executive Officer
$10.18M
@ $4020.88 · 2025-10-17
MURPHY JOHN SCOTT
Officer
$11.94M
@ $4175.70 · 2025-09-24
SMITH RICHARD CRAIG
Officer
$11.63M
@ $3875.90 · 2025-07-24
BORNINKHOF MICHELLE K
Chief Technology Officer
$2.70M
@ $3597.13 · 2025-06-20
RHODES WILLIAM C III
Officer and Director
$102.00M
@ $3708.94 · 2025-06-10
JACKSON JAMERE
Chief Financial Officer
$9.74M
@ $3728.05 · 2025-05-30
HURTADO DOMINGO
Officer
$17.57M
@ $3660.00 · 2025-04-22
GOULD ERIC S
Officer
$5.70M
@ $3800.00 · 2025-03-31
DANIELE PHILIP B. III
Chief Executive Officer
$7.60M
@ $3800.01 · 2025-03-27
SMITH RICHARD CRAIG
Officer
$10.29M
@ $3610.00 · 2025-03-20
BORNINKHOF MICHELLE K
Chief Technology Officer
$481,575
@ $3567.22 · 2025-03-11
LERICHE DENNIS W
Officer
$5.67M
@ $3600.00 · 2025-03-07
CHILDRESS BAILEY L
Officer
$568,000
@ $3550.00 · 2025-03-05
MRKONIC GEORGE R JR
Director
$1.08M
@ $3202.29 · 2024-12-31
RHODES WILLIAM C III
Officer and Director
$40.39M
@ $3107.15 · 2024-10-10
RHODES WILLIAM C III
Officer and Director
$7.56M
@ $3105.97 · 2024-10-03
RHODES WILLIAM C III
Officer and Director
$34.28M
@ $3098.44 · 2024-10-02
MURPHY JOHN SCOTT
Officer
$4.91M
@ $3107.69 · 2024-09-25
RHODES WILLIAM C III
Officer and Director
$38.44M
@ $3189.75 · 2024-03-26
RHODES WILLIAM C III
Officer and Director
$21.37M
@ $3190.22 · 2024-03-26
GOULD ERIC S
Officer
$6.72M
@ $3200.00 · 2024-03-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ORCL
4
Sells (3M)
22
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.90B
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.55M
@ $155.23 · 2026-02-09
KEHRING DOUGLAS A
Officer
$6.82M
@ $194.89 · 2026-01-15
HURA MARK
Officer
$2.95M
@ $196.89 · 2025-12-24
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$437,064
@ $196.61 · 2025-12-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.93M
@ $192.52 · 2025-12-19
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.80M
@ $280.31 · 2025-10-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$11.07M
@ $276.64 · 2025-10-21
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$5.93M
@ $300.00 · 2025-10-10
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$641,958
@ $288.91 · 2025-09-26
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$10.87M
@ $321.16 · 2025-09-23
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$5.12M
@ $313.60 · 2025-09-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
President
$6.31M
@ $297.11 · 2025-09-12
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$4.04M
@ $254.48 · 2025-08-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$770,656
@ $233.32 · 2025-07-16
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.33M
@ $232.99 · 2025-07-03
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$267.24M
@ $212.01 · 2025-06-27
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$794.64M
@ $212.50 · 2025-06-26
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$764.01M
@ $206.77 · 2025-06-23
CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
Director
$1.74M
@ $213.49 · 2025-06-17
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Officer
$3.21M
@ $214.10 · 2025-06-17
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$428,562
@ $149.53 · 2025-05-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$291,620
@ $145.81 · 2025-04-02
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$705.46M
@ $185.40 · 2025-01-24
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$1.04M
@ $165.00 · 2024-09-16
ELLISON LAWRENCE JOSEPH
Chief Technology Officer
$322.05M
@ $143.13 · 2024-07-16
SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
Officer
$60.58M
@ $141.91 · 2024-07-10
SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
Officer
$5.22M
@ $140.19 · 2024-06-26
SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
Officer
$34.04M
@ $144.30 · 2024-06-20
BOSKIN MICHAEL J
Director
$5.30M
@ $117.74 · 2024-05-07
CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
Director
$2.32M
@ $116.00 · 2024-05-03
CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
Director
$2.90M
@ $116.13 · 2024-05-01
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$346.77M
@ $126.10 · 2024-03-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AZO
FearGreed
😨Fear(36/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ORCL
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AZO
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (36)
ORCL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
View AZO Full AnalysisView ORCL Full Analysis