Compare Stocks › AXP vs TTWO

American Express Company (AXP) vs Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, AXP is undervalued at $319, with a DCF intrinsic value of $462 and a margin of safety of 31%. TTWO is undervalued at $190, with an intrinsic value of $326 and a margin of safety of 42%. Of the two, TTWO has the wider margin of safety.

AXP
American Express Company
$319.11
VS
TTWO
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
$190.17

Rewards

AXP
  • ★Gross margin of 62.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★American Express Company scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
TTWO

    Risks

    AXP
    • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.93 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • ⚠Insiders have sold $3.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
    • ⚠Free cash flow has declined at a 5.9% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
    TTWO
    • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.61 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • ⚠6 insider sales totaling $2.9M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    AXP
    TTWO
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.26B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    3.53%
    17.98
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    15.80
    Forward P/E
    18.50
    Quality & Moat
    11.07%
    ROIC
    0.42%
    35.93%
    ROE
    -9.04%
    61.95%
    Gross Margin
    57.13%
    1.32
    PEG Ratio
    2.61
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.46
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.31
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.46
    1.19%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    AXP: 6Ties: 1TTWO: 1
    AXPTTWO

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    AXP

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    TTWO
    No data available for this metric.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    AXP
    $6.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $23.29B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$144.01B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    TTWO
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-8.52B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$8.07B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    AXP
    31.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 31.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $319.11
    Fair Value: $462.42
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    TTWO
    41.6% Margin of Safety
    Price is 41.6% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $190.17
    Fair Value: $325.90
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    AXP

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    TTWO

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $190?

    +18.7%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +12.8%

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    AXP
    100/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    TTWO
    39/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    AXP
    -2.51
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    TTWO

    Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    AXP
    Insiders 22.7%Institutions 65.0%Retail & Other 12.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,716
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    TTWO
    Insiders 1.8%Institutions 100.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,554
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    AXP
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    JOABAR RAYMOND D
    Officer
    $4,054
    @ $176.26 · 2025-04-09
    ANGELAKIS MICHAEL J
    Director
    $998,593
    @ $269.89 · 2025-03-07
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    TTWO
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    AXP
    1
    Sells (3M)
    10
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $42.29M
    HERENA MONIQUE
    Officer
    $2.97M
    @ $337.41 · 2026-08-18
    MCNEAL GLENDA G
    Officer
    $2.39M
    @ $339.36 · 2026-06-15
    LIEBERMAN QUINN JESSICA
    Officer
    $909,661
    @ $300.02 · 2026-03-06
    JOABAR RAYMOND D
    Officer
    $4.77M
    @ $340.67 · 2026-02-19
    GROSFIELD HOWARD M
    Officer
    $2.82M
    @ $346.73 · 2026-02-12
    RADHAKRISHNAN RAVIKUMAR S
    Chief Technology Officer
    $5.35M
    @ $356.58 · 2026-02-09
    SEEGER LAUREEN E
    Officer
    $4.60M
    @ $360.99 · 2026-02-09
    MARRS ANNA
    Officer
    $9.60M
    @ $350.01 · 2026-02-05
    PICKETT DENISE
    Officer
    $8.35M
    @ $356.91 · 2026-02-05
    JOABAR RAYMOND D
    Officer
    $538,902
    @ $384.93 · 2025-12-12
    RUTLEDGE ELIZABETH
    Officer
    $18.01M
    @ $360.21 · 2025-10-31
    TABISH DOUGLAS J
    Officer
    $894,359
    @ $355.61 · 2025-10-23
    PICKETT DENISE
    Officer
    $1.75M
    @ $350.73 · 2025-10-22
    SQUERI STEPHEN J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $37.03M
    @ $329.86 · 2025-09-04
    HERENA MONIQUE
    Officer
    $2.83M
    @ $325.88 · 2025-09-03
    BUCKMINSTER DOUGLAS E
    Officer
    $7.67M
    @ $326.37 · 2025-09-02
    SEEGER LAUREEN E
    Officer
    $23.37M
    @ $296.90 · 2025-08-06
    MCNEAL GLENDA G
    Officer
    $15.47M
    @ $309.50 · 2025-07-29
    MARRS ANNA
    Officer
    $1.71M
    @ $310.77 · 2025-07-29
    MARQUEZ RAFAEL
    Officer
    $3.56M
    @ $296.93 · 2025-05-20
    GROSFIELD HOWARD M
    Officer
    $2.60M
    @ $275.50 · 2025-05-06
    MCNEAL GLENDA G
    Officer
    $799,009
    @ $264.66 · 2025-04-29
    MARRS ANNA
    President
    $6.32M
    @ $287.88 · 2025-03-04
    LIEBERMAN QUINN JESSICA
    Officer
    $897,590
    @ $296.43 · 2025-02-26
    MCNEAL GLENDA G
    Officer
    $2.29M
    @ $309.96 · 2025-02-11
    SQUERI STEPHEN J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $16.24M
    @ $319.45 · 2025-02-06
    JOABAR RAYMOND D
    Officer
    $3.53M
    @ $317.01 · 2025-02-05
    RADHAKRISHNAN RAVIKUMAR S
    Chief Technology Officer
    $3.03M
    @ $319.17 · 2025-02-05
    PICKETT DENISE
    Officer
    $7.25M
    @ $318.69 · 2025-02-05
    JOABAR RAYMOND D
    Officer
    $4.77M
    @ $313.94 · 2025-01-28
    LE CAILLEC CHRISTOPHE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.82M
    @ $303.48 · 2024-11-27
    SQUERI STEPHEN J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $48.90M
    @ $286.57 · 2024-11-07
    HERENA MONIQUE
    Officer
    $374,010
    @ $287.70 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    TTWO
    6
    Sells (3M)
    25
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $15.17M
    SHERESKY MICHAEL J
    Director
    $98,586
    @ $203.69 · 2026-10-02
    GORDON WILLIAM BINGHAM
    Director
    $2.02M
    @ $202.39 · 2026-09-29
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $361,055
    @ $217.37 · 2026-09-03
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $290,563
    @ $217.65 · 2026-09-02
    SRINIVASAN LAVERNE EVANS
    Director
    $88,694
    @ $245.01 · 2026-08-17
    SHERESKY MICHAEL J
    Director
    $31,116
    @ $245.01 · 2026-08-17
    MOSES JON J
    Director
    $122,305
    @ $244.61 · 2026-06-22
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $1.02M
    @ $230.00 · 2026-06-16
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $950,515
    @ $215.00 · 2026-06-15
    MOSES JON J
    Director
    $107,608
    @ $215.22 · 2026-06-15
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $1.89M
    @ $214.00 · 2026-06-08
    DORNEMANN MICHAEL
    Director
    $249,790
    @ $217.02 · 2026-06-04
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $4.63M
    @ $219.61 · 2026-06-02
    SRINIVASAN LAVERNE EVANS
    Director
    $85,548
    @ $229.35 · 2026-06-01
    SHERESKY MICHAEL J
    Director
    $28,592
    @ $218.26 · 2026-05-29
    GORDON WILLIAM BINGHAM
    Director
    $521,725
    @ $208.69 · 2026-03-09
    DORNEMANN MICHAEL
    Director
    $296,195
    @ $213.09 · 2026-03-05
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $248,906
    @ $213.47 · 2026-03-02
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $535,637
    @ $213.57 · 2026-03-02
    GORDON WILLIAM BINGHAM
    Director
    $522,525
    @ $209.01 · 2026-03-02
    SHERESKY MICHAEL J
    Director
    $30,183
    @ $194.73 · 2026-02-18
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $399,953
    @ $248.11 · 2025-12-02
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $274,658
    @ $248.11 · 2025-12-02
    SRINIVASAN LAVERNE EVANS
    Director
    $321,664
    @ $238.27 · 2025-11-18
    SHERESKY MICHAEL J
    Director
    $42,790
    @ $235.11 · 2025-11-17
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.50M
    @ $250.00 · 2025-09-08
    MOSES JON J
    Director
    $239,570
    @ $239.57 · 2025-09-04
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $474,110
    @ $238.73 · 2025-09-03
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.77M
    @ $239.57 · 2025-09-02
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.61M
    @ $230.64 · 2025-08-28
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $5.11M
    @ $227.47 · 2025-08-21
    SRINIVASAN LAVERNE EVANS
    Director
    $528,868
    @ $227.47 · 2025-08-21
    SLATOFF KARL
    President
    $11.16M
    @ $227.68 · 2025-08-21
    SHERESKY MICHAEL J
    Director
    $46,227
    @ $233.47 · 2025-08-18
    MOSES JON J
    Director
    $231,330
    @ $231.33 · 2025-08-15
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $8.95M
    @ $225.22 · 2025-06-02
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $6.09M
    @ $225.22 · 2025-06-02
    SHERESKY MICHAEL J
    Director
    $45,106
    @ $225.53 · 2025-06-02
    SHERESKY MICHAEL J
    Director
    $37,057
    @ $214.20 · 2025-03-06
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $175,118
    @ $211.24 · 2025-03-03
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $121,885
    @ $211.24 · 2025-03-03
    SLATOFF KARL
    President
    $7.02M
    @ $208.13 · 2025-02-25
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $262,197
    @ $187.95 · 2024-12-03
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $212,221
    @ $187.64 · 2024-12-02
    EMERSON DANIEL P
    Officer
    $818,545
    @ $176.79 · 2024-11-08
    SRINIVASAN LAVERNE EVANS
    Director
    $358,340
    @ $179.17 · 2024-11-08
    GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $8.76M
    @ $175.05 · 2024-11-08
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    AXP
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(51/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    TTWO
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(32/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    AXP
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
    TTWO
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (32)
    View AXP Full AnalysisView TTWO Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: AXP vs TTWO

    Is American Express Company or Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, TTWO trades at a 41.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $326 vs. price $190), compared to AXP's 31.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $462 vs. $319).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, American Express Company or Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.?▼

    AXP scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while TTWO scores 39/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is American Express Company in financial distress?▼

    AXP's Altman Z-Score of 0.9 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TTWO scores 3.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, American Express Company or Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.?▼

    AXP earns 11.1% ROIC versus TTWO's 0.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    AXP vs TTWO: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io