Compare StocksAXP vs TTD

American Express Company (AXP) vs The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-21, AXP is undervalued at $338, with a DCF intrinsic value of $484 and a margin of safety of 30%. TTD is undervalued at $19, with an intrinsic value of $35 and a margin of safety of 47%. Of the two, TTD has the wider margin of safety.

AXP
American Express Company
$338.00
VS
TTD
The Trade Desk, Inc.
$18.51

Rewards

AXP
  • Gross margin of 62.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • American Express Company scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
TTD
  • Gross margin of 77.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 19.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.27 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

AXP
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.93 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $2.4M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 5.9% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
TTD

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    AXP
    TTD
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $782.96M
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    9.00%
    21.10
    Trailing P/E
    21.03
    16.77
    Forward P/E
    8.61
    Quality & Moat
    12.23%
    ROIC
    7.89%
    34.42%
    ROE
    16.74%
    62.76%
    Gross Margin
    77.83%
    1.61
    PEG Ratio
    0.88
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.19
    Net Debt / Equity
    Net cash
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -1.38
    1.12%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    AXP: 3Ties: 2TTD: 4
    AXPTTD

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    AXP

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    TTD

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    AXP
    $6.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $23.29B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$144.01B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    TTD
    $-3.86
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $1.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-3.92B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    AXP
    30.1% Margin of Safety
    Price is 30.1% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $338.00
    Fair Value: $483.58
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    TTD
    47.3% Margin of Safety
    Price is 47.3% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $18.51
    Fair Value: $35.13
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    AXP

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    TTD

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $19?

    +5.8%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -2.0%

    The market implies +5.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -2.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    AXP
    100/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    TTD
    59/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    AXP
    -2.51
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    TTD
    -3.05
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    AXP
    Insiders 22.3%Institutions 65.3%Retail & Other 12.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,665
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    TTD
    Insiders 2.2%Institutions 89.6%Retail & Other 8.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,152
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    AXP
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    JOABAR RAYMOND D
    Officer
    $4,054
    @ $176.26 · 2025-04-09
    ANGELAKIS MICHAEL J
    Director
    $998,593
    @ $269.89 · 2025-03-07
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    TTD
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $148.10M
    GREEN JEFFREY TERRY
    Chief Executive Officer
    $148.10M
    @ $24.68 · 2026-03-04
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    AXP
    1
    Sells (3M)
    18
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $148.07M
    MCNEAL GLENDA G
    Officer
    $2.39M
    @ $339.36 · 2026-06-15
    LIEBERMAN QUINN JESSICA
    Officer
    $909,661
    @ $300.02 · 2026-03-06
    JOABAR RAYMOND D
    Officer
    $4.77M
    @ $340.67 · 2026-02-19
    GROSFIELD HOWARD M
    Officer
    $2.82M
    @ $346.73 · 2026-02-12
    RADHAKRISHNAN RAVIKUMAR S
    Chief Technology Officer
    $5.35M
    @ $356.58 · 2026-02-09
    SEEGER LAUREEN E
    Officer
    $4.60M
    @ $360.99 · 2026-02-09
    PICKETT DENISE
    Officer
    $8.35M
    @ $356.91 · 2026-02-05
    MARRS ANNA
    Officer
    $9.60M
    @ $350.01 · 2026-02-05
    JOABAR RAYMOND D
    Officer
    $538,902
    @ $384.93 · 2025-12-12
    RUTLEDGE ELIZABETH
    Officer
    $18.01M
    @ $360.21 · 2025-10-31
    TABISH DOUGLAS J
    Officer
    $894,359
    @ $355.61 · 2025-10-23
    PICKETT DENISE
    Officer
    $1.75M
    @ $350.73 · 2025-10-22
    SQUERI STEPHEN J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $37.03M
    @ $329.86 · 2025-09-04
    HERENA MONIQUE
    Officer
    $2.83M
    @ $325.88 · 2025-09-03
    BUCKMINSTER DOUGLAS E
    Officer
    $7.67M
    @ $326.37 · 2025-09-02
    SEEGER LAUREEN E
    Officer
    $23.37M
    @ $296.90 · 2025-08-06
    MARRS ANNA
    Officer
    $1.71M
    @ $310.77 · 2025-07-29
    MCNEAL GLENDA G
    Officer
    $15.47M
    @ $309.50 · 2025-07-29
    MARQUEZ RAFAEL
    Officer
    $3.56M
    @ $296.93 · 2025-05-20
    GROSFIELD HOWARD M
    Officer
    $2.60M
    @ $275.50 · 2025-05-06
    MCNEAL GLENDA G
    Officer
    $799,009
    @ $264.66 · 2025-04-29
    MARRS ANNA
    President
    $6.32M
    @ $287.88 · 2025-03-04
    LIEBERMAN QUINN JESSICA
    Officer
    $897,590
    @ $296.43 · 2025-02-26
    MCNEAL GLENDA G
    Officer
    $2.29M
    @ $309.96 · 2025-02-11
    SQUERI STEPHEN J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $16.24M
    @ $319.45 · 2025-02-06
    RADHAKRISHNAN RAVIKUMAR S
    Chief Technology Officer
    $3.03M
    @ $319.17 · 2025-02-05
    PICKETT DENISE
    Officer
    $7.25M
    @ $318.69 · 2025-02-05
    JOABAR RAYMOND D
    Officer
    $3.53M
    @ $317.01 · 2025-02-05
    JOABAR RAYMOND D
    Officer
    $4.77M
    @ $313.94 · 2025-01-28
    LE CAILLEC CHRISTOPHE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.82M
    @ $303.48 · 2024-11-27
    HERENA MONIQUE
    Officer
    $374,010
    @ $287.70 · 2024-11-07
    SQUERI STEPHEN J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $48.90M
    @ $286.57 · 2024-11-07
    BUCKMINSTER DOUGLAS E
    Officer
    $3.55M
    @ $270.98 · 2024-10-29
    WILLIAMS ANRE D.
    Officer
    $21.05M
    @ $270.26 · 2024-10-22
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    TTD
    1
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $5.88M
    JACOBSON SAMANTHA
    Director
    $1.13M
    @ $21.14 · 2026-05-28
    CUNNINGHAM ANDREA LEE
    Director
    $67,625
    @ $48.20 · 2025-09-10
    GRANT JAY R
    Officer
    $4.68M
    @ $91.18 · 2025-08-07
    SCHENKEIN LAURA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $368,662
    @ $76.66 · 2025-05-16
    WELLS DAVID B
    Director
    $2.29M
    @ $79.88 · 2025-05-13
    SCHENKEIN LAURA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $446,180
    @ $70.00 · 2025-05-09
    JACOBSON SAMANTHA
    Officer and Director
    $509,551
    @ $118.56 · 2025-01-28
    GRANT JAY R
    Officer
    $2.21M
    @ $119.35 · 2024-12-30
    JACOBSON SAMANTHA
    Officer and Director
    $513,316
    @ $119.46 · 2024-12-30
    JACOBSON SAMANTHA
    Officer and Director
    $2.83M
    @ $128.25 · 2024-11-29
    SCHENKEIN LAURA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $369,364
    @ $117.97 · 2024-11-18
    SCHENKEIN LAURA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.53M
    @ $127.55 · 2024-11-07
    SCHENKEIN LAURA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.01M
    @ $120.43 · 2024-10-22
    RAJARAM GOKUL
    Director
    $159,741
    @ $117.89 · 2024-10-21
    SCHENKEIN LAURA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.89M
    @ $115.43 · 2024-10-09
    GRANT JAY R
    Officer
    $2.24M
    @ $108.65 · 2024-09-30
    RAJARAM GOKUL
    Director
    $147,695
    @ $109.00 · 2024-09-24
    RAJARAM GOKUL
    Director
    $141,855
    @ $104.69 · 2024-08-22
    SCHENKEIN LAURA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $310,903
    @ $99.33 · 2024-08-16
    JACOBSON SAMANTHA
    Officer and Director
    $484,764
    @ $99.50 · 2024-08-16
    CUNNINGHAM ANDREA LEE
    Director
    $160,712
    @ $100.07 · 2024-08-15
    FALBERG KATHRYN E.
    Director
    $14.73M
    @ $98.17 · 2024-08-13
    JACOBSON SAMANTHA
    Officer and Director
    $2.11M
    @ $99.50 · 2024-08-12
    RAJARAM GOKUL
    Director
    $133,291
    @ $98.37 · 2024-07-22
    SCHENKEIN LAURA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.51M
    @ $100.43 · 2024-07-09
    GRANT JAY R
    Officer
    $13.78M
    @ $97.42 · 2024-06-28
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    AXP
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(58/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    TTD
    FearGreed
    🥶Extreme Fear(20/100)

    "Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    AXP
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
    TTD
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (20)
    View AXP Full AnalysisView TTD Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: AXP vs TTD

    Is American Express Company or The Trade Desk, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, TTD trades at a 47.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $35 vs. price $19), compared to AXP's 30.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $484 vs. $338).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, American Express Company or The Trade Desk, Inc.?

    AXP scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while TTD scores 59/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is American Express Company in financial distress?

    AXP's Altman Z-Score of 0.9 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TTD scores 4.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, American Express Company or The Trade Desk, Inc.?

    AXP earns 12.2% ROIC versus TTD's 7.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.