Compare StocksAXP vs STE

American Express Company (AXP) vs STERIS plc (STE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, AXP is undervalued at $313, with a DCF intrinsic value of $476 and a margin of safety of 34%. STE is overvalued at $208, with an intrinsic value of $181 and a margin of safety of -15%. Of the two, AXP has the wider margin of safety.

AXP
American Express Company
$313.42
VS
STE
STERIS plc
$208.41

Rewards

AXP
  • Gross margin of 62.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • American Express Company scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
STE
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 35.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.76 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 4 years showed value-accretive repurchases.

Risks

AXP
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.93 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $3.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 5.9% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
STE
  • 9 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AXP
STE
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$798.86M
N/A
FCF Yield
3.93%
19.03
Trailing P/E
25.45
15.59
Forward P/E
17.02
Quality & Moat
12.19%
ROIC
9.86%
34.38%
ROE
11.39%
62.34%
Gross Margin
44.42%
1.27
PEG Ratio
1.78
Balance Sheet Safety
0.39
Net Debt / Equity
0.22
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.95
1.22%
Dividend Yield
1.23%
AXP: 6Ties: 2STE: 1
AXPSTE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AXP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

STE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AXP
$6.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$23.29B
Δ Market Cap
+$144.01B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
STE
$-1.17
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$1.11B
Δ Market Cap
$-1.30B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AXP
34.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 34.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $313.42
Fair Value: $476.32
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
STE
15.4% Overvalued
Price is 15.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $208.41
Fair Value: $180.59
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AXP

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

STE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $208?

+12.0%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market below historical growth — potential opportunity.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AXP
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
STE
63/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AXP
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
STE
-2.67
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AXP
Insiders 22.6%Institutions 64.6%Retail & Other 12.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,783
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
STE
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 101.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,226
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AXP
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$4,054
@ $176.26 · 2025-04-09
ANGELAKIS MICHAEL J
Director
$998,593
@ $269.89 · 2025-03-07
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
STE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AXP
1
Sells (3M)
13
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $62.95M
HERENA MONIQUE
Officer
$2.97M
@ $337.41 · 2026-08-18
MCNEAL GLENDA G
Officer
$2.39M
@ $339.36 · 2026-06-15
LIEBERMAN QUINN JESSICA
Officer
$909,661
@ $300.02 · 2026-03-06
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$4.77M
@ $340.67 · 2026-02-19
GROSFIELD HOWARD M
Officer
$2.82M
@ $346.73 · 2026-02-12
SEEGER LAUREEN E
Officer
$4.60M
@ $360.99 · 2026-02-09
RADHAKRISHNAN RAVIKUMAR S
Chief Technology Officer
$5.35M
@ $356.58 · 2026-02-09
PICKETT DENISE
Officer
$8.35M
@ $356.91 · 2026-02-05
MARRS ANNA
Officer
$9.60M
@ $350.01 · 2026-02-05
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$538,902
@ $384.93 · 2025-12-12
RUTLEDGE ELIZABETH
Officer
$18.01M
@ $360.21 · 2025-10-31
TABISH DOUGLAS J
Officer
$894,359
@ $355.61 · 2025-10-23
PICKETT DENISE
Officer
$1.75M
@ $350.73 · 2025-10-22
SQUERI STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$37.03M
@ $329.86 · 2025-09-04
HERENA MONIQUE
Officer
$2.83M
@ $325.88 · 2025-09-03
BUCKMINSTER DOUGLAS E
Officer
$7.67M
@ $326.37 · 2025-09-02
SEEGER LAUREEN E
Officer
$23.37M
@ $296.90 · 2025-08-06
MCNEAL GLENDA G
Officer
$15.47M
@ $309.50 · 2025-07-29
MARRS ANNA
Officer
$1.71M
@ $310.77 · 2025-07-29
MARQUEZ RAFAEL
Officer
$3.56M
@ $296.93 · 2025-05-20
GROSFIELD HOWARD M
Officer
$2.60M
@ $275.50 · 2025-05-06
MCNEAL GLENDA G
Officer
$799,009
@ $264.66 · 2025-04-29
MARRS ANNA
President
$6.32M
@ $287.88 · 2025-03-04
LIEBERMAN QUINN JESSICA
Officer
$897,590
@ $296.43 · 2025-02-26
MCNEAL GLENDA G
Officer
$2.29M
@ $309.96 · 2025-02-11
SQUERI STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$16.24M
@ $319.45 · 2025-02-06
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$3.53M
@ $317.01 · 2025-02-05
RADHAKRISHNAN RAVIKUMAR S
Chief Technology Officer
$3.03M
@ $319.17 · 2025-02-05
PICKETT DENISE
Officer
$7.25M
@ $318.69 · 2025-02-05
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$4.77M
@ $313.94 · 2025-01-28
LE CAILLEC CHRISTOPHE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.82M
@ $303.48 · 2024-11-27
SQUERI STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$48.90M
@ $286.57 · 2024-11-07
HERENA MONIQUE
Officer
$374,010
@ $287.70 · 2024-11-07
BUCKMINSTER DOUGLAS E
Officer
$3.55M
@ $270.98 · 2024-10-29
WILLIAMS ANRE D.
Officer
$21.05M
@ $270.26 · 2024-10-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
STE
1
Sells (3M)
9
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $9.87M
SOHI MOHSEN M
Director
$956,795
@ $235.78 · 2026-08-12
ZANGERLE JOHN ADAM
General Counsel
$296,968
@ $209.28 · 2026-06-15
CARESTIO DANIEL A
Chief Executive Officer
$946,799
@ $213.82 · 2026-06-05
BREEDEN RICHARD C.
Director
$310,284
@ $209.51 · 2026-06-02
FELDMANN CYNTHIA L
Director
$734,877
@ $237.21 · 2026-03-05
MADSEN JULIA
Officer
$1.31M
@ $262.00 · 2025-11-21
TAMARO RENATO
Officer and Treasurer
$1.30M
@ $257.55 · 2025-11-18
ZANGERLE JOHN ADAM
General Counsel
$3.98M
@ $265.14 · 2025-11-11
CARESTIO DANIEL A
Chief Executive Officer
$38,449
@ $241.82 · 2025-10-06
TAMARO RENATO
Officer and Treasurer
$798,565
@ $249.24 · 2025-08-20
BURTON KAREN L
Officer
$1.91M
@ $241.73 · 2025-08-11
SOHI MOHSEN M
Director
$994,456
@ $241.96 · 2025-08-11
FELDMANN CYNTHIA L
Director
$844,252
@ $241.56 · 2025-08-11
ZANGERLE JOHN ADAM
General Counsel
$477,581
@ $241.45 · 2025-06-13
CARESTIO DANIEL A
Chief Executive Officer
$4.28M
@ $242.56 · 2025-06-05
MAJORS CARY L
Officer
$3.21M
@ $250.08 · 2025-05-20
MAJORS CARY L
Officer
$365,532
@ $217.32 · 2024-11-25
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AXP
FearGreed
😐Neutral(42/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
STE
FearGreed
😨Fear(37/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AXP
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (42)
STE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
View AXP Full AnalysisView STE Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AXP vs STE

Is American Express Company or STERIS plc more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, AXP trades at a 34.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $476 vs. price $313), compared to STE's -15.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $181 vs. $208).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, American Express Company or STERIS plc?

AXP scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while STE scores 63/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is American Express Company in financial distress?

AXP's Altman Z-Score of 0.9 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. STE scores 4.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, American Express Company or STERIS plc?

AXP earns 12.2% ROIC versus STE's 9.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, American Express Company's or STERIS plc's?

STE's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to AXP's 94/100 (Very Safe). STE has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.