Compare StocksAXP vs Q

American Express Company (AXP) vs Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, AXP is undervalued at $312, with a DCF intrinsic value of $476 and a margin of safety of 34%. Q is fairly valued at $115, with an intrinsic value of $132 and a margin of safety of 13%. Of the two, AXP has the wider margin of safety.

AXP
American Express Company
$312.43
VS
Q
Qnity Electronics, Inc.
$114.86

Rewards

AXP
  • Gross margin of 62.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • American Express Company scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
Q

    Risks

    AXP
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.93 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • Insiders have sold $3.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 5.9% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
    Q

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      AXP
      Q
      Valuation
      N/A
      Free Cash Flow
      $772.25M
      N/A
      FCF Yield
      3.21%
      18.97
      Trailing P/E
      41.02
      15.54
      Forward P/E
      21.36
      Quality & Moat
      12.19%
      ROIC
      7.61%
      34.38%
      ROE
      6.72%
      62.34%
      Gross Margin
      46.22%
      1.27
      PEG Ratio
      1.24
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.39
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.47
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      N/A
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      2.34
      1.22%
      Dividend Yield
      0.28%
      AXP: 7Ties: 2Q: 0
      AXPQ

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      AXP

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Q

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      AXP
      $6.18
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Exceptional Value Creator
      Σ Retained
      $23.29B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$144.01B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      Q
      Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      AXP
      34.4% Margin of Safety
      Price is 34.4% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $312.43
      Fair Value: $476.32
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      Q
      6.5% Margin of Safety
      Price is 6.5% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $114.86
      Fair Value: $122.85
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      AXP

      Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

      Q

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $115?

      +15.4%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +15.6%

      The market implies +15.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      AXP
      100/100
      Wide Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      Q
      47/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      AXP
      -2.51
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      Q
      -2.57
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      AXP
      Insiders 22.6%Institutions 64.6%Retail & Other 12.8%
      No. of Institutional Holders3,783
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      Q
      Insiders 0.1%Institutions 78.8%Retail & Other 21.2%
      No. of Institutional Holders1,676
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      AXP
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      JOABAR RAYMOND D
      Officer
      $4,054
      @ $176.26 · 2025-04-09
      ANGELAKIS MICHAEL J
      Director
      $998,593
      @ $269.89 · 2025-03-07
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      Q
      1
      Buys (3M)
      3
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $467,708
      DE BONDT KARIN
      Director
      $138,136
      @ $138.14 · 2026-08-11
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $250,452
      @ $77.30 · 2025-11-21
      GREEN BYRON
      Director
      $79,120
      @ $79.12 · 2025-11-19
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      AXP
      1
      Sells (3M)
      13
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $62.95M
      HERENA MONIQUE
      Officer
      $2.97M
      @ $337.41 · 2026-08-18
      MCNEAL GLENDA G
      Officer
      $2.39M
      @ $339.36 · 2026-06-15
      LIEBERMAN QUINN JESSICA
      Officer
      $909,661
      @ $300.02 · 2026-03-06
      JOABAR RAYMOND D
      Officer
      $4.77M
      @ $340.67 · 2026-02-19
      GROSFIELD HOWARD M
      Officer
      $2.82M
      @ $346.73 · 2026-02-12
      SEEGER LAUREEN E
      Officer
      $4.60M
      @ $360.99 · 2026-02-09
      RADHAKRISHNAN RAVIKUMAR S
      Chief Technology Officer
      $5.35M
      @ $356.58 · 2026-02-09
      PICKETT DENISE
      Officer
      $8.35M
      @ $356.91 · 2026-02-05
      MARRS ANNA
      Officer
      $9.60M
      @ $350.01 · 2026-02-05
      JOABAR RAYMOND D
      Officer
      $538,902
      @ $384.93 · 2025-12-12
      RUTLEDGE ELIZABETH
      Officer
      $18.01M
      @ $360.21 · 2025-10-31
      TABISH DOUGLAS J
      Officer
      $894,359
      @ $355.61 · 2025-10-23
      PICKETT DENISE
      Officer
      $1.75M
      @ $350.73 · 2025-10-22
      SQUERI STEPHEN J
      Chief Executive Officer
      $37.03M
      @ $329.86 · 2025-09-04
      HERENA MONIQUE
      Officer
      $2.83M
      @ $325.88 · 2025-09-03
      BUCKMINSTER DOUGLAS E
      Officer
      $7.67M
      @ $326.37 · 2025-09-02
      SEEGER LAUREEN E
      Officer
      $23.37M
      @ $296.90 · 2025-08-06
      MCNEAL GLENDA G
      Officer
      $15.47M
      @ $309.50 · 2025-07-29
      MARRS ANNA
      Officer
      $1.71M
      @ $310.77 · 2025-07-29
      MARQUEZ RAFAEL
      Officer
      $3.56M
      @ $296.93 · 2025-05-20
      GROSFIELD HOWARD M
      Officer
      $2.60M
      @ $275.50 · 2025-05-06
      MCNEAL GLENDA G
      Officer
      $799,009
      @ $264.66 · 2025-04-29
      MARRS ANNA
      President
      $6.32M
      @ $287.88 · 2025-03-04
      LIEBERMAN QUINN JESSICA
      Officer
      $897,590
      @ $296.43 · 2025-02-26
      MCNEAL GLENDA G
      Officer
      $2.29M
      @ $309.96 · 2025-02-11
      SQUERI STEPHEN J
      Chief Executive Officer
      $16.24M
      @ $319.45 · 2025-02-06
      JOABAR RAYMOND D
      Officer
      $3.53M
      @ $317.01 · 2025-02-05
      RADHAKRISHNAN RAVIKUMAR S
      Chief Technology Officer
      $3.03M
      @ $319.17 · 2025-02-05
      PICKETT DENISE
      Officer
      $7.25M
      @ $318.69 · 2025-02-05
      JOABAR RAYMOND D
      Officer
      $4.77M
      @ $313.94 · 2025-01-28
      LE CAILLEC CHRISTOPHE
      Chief Financial Officer
      $1.82M
      @ $303.48 · 2024-11-27
      SQUERI STEPHEN J
      Chief Executive Officer
      $48.90M
      @ $286.57 · 2024-11-07
      HERENA MONIQUE
      Officer
      $374,010
      @ $287.70 · 2024-11-07
      BUCKMINSTER DOUGLAS E
      Officer
      $3.55M
      @ $270.98 · 2024-10-29
      WILLIAMS ANRE D.
      Officer
      $21.05M
      @ $270.26 · 2024-10-22
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      Q
      0
      Sells (3M)
      6
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $970,297
      STERIN STEVEN M
      Director
      $59,340
      @ $148.35 · 2026-06-05
      STERIN STEVEN M
      Director
      $82,764
      @ $161.96 · 2026-05-26
      GOSS MICHAEL G.
      Officer
      $160,677
      @ $84.79 · 2025-12-11
      KEMP JON D
      Chief Executive Officer
      $480,732
      @ $85.01 · 2025-12-11
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $534.00
      @ $76.29 · 2025-11-21
      KANG SANG HO
      Officer
      $186,250
      @ $74.50 · 2025-11-21
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      AXP
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(41/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      Q
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(36/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      AXP
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
      Q
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (36)
      View AXP Full AnalysisView Q Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: AXP vs Q

      Is American Express Company or Qnity Electronics, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, AXP trades at a 34.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $476 vs. price $312), compared to Q's 13.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $132 vs. $115).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, American Express Company or Qnity Electronics, Inc.?

      AXP scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while Q scores 47/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is American Express Company in financial distress?

      AXP's Altman Z-Score of 0.9 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. Q scores 2.2 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, American Express Company or Qnity Electronics, Inc.?

      AXP earns 12.2% ROIC versus Q's 7.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      Which dividend is safer, American Express Company's or Qnity Electronics, Inc.'s?

      AXP's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to Q's 85/100 (Very Safe). AXP has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

      AXP vs Q: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io