Compare StocksAXP vs NEM

American Express Company (AXP) vs Newmont Corporation (NEM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, AXP is undervalued at $336, with a DCF intrinsic value of $477 and a margin of safety of 30%. NEM is overvalued at $94, with an intrinsic value of $42 and a margin of safety of -121%. Of the two, AXP has the wider margin of safety.

AXP
American Express Company
$336.25
VS
NEM
Newmont Corporation
$93.71

Rewards

AXP
  • Gross margin of 62.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • American Express Company scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
NEM
  • Gross margin of 68.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 88.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $19.40 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

AXP
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.93 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $2.4M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 5.9% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
NEM
  • Share count has increased by 37% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • PEG ratio of 2.78 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 21 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AXP
NEM
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$8.82B
N/A
FCF Yield
8.93%
20.40
Trailing P/E
11.82
16.72
Forward P/E
8.85
Quality & Moat
12.19%
ROIC
25.60%
34.38%
ROE
25.91%
62.34%
Gross Margin
68.04%
1.57
PEG Ratio
2.78
Balance Sheet Safety
0.39
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.20
1.13%
Dividend Yield
1.11%
AXP: 2Ties: 2NEM: 5
AXPNEM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AXP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

NEM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AXP
$6.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$23.29B
Δ Market Cap
+$144.01B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
NEM
$16.69
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.27B
Δ Market Cap
+$71.31B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AXP
29.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 29.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $336.25
Fair Value: $477.26
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
NEM
50.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 50.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $93.71
Fair Value: $189.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AXP

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

NEM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $94?

+2.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -0.8%

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AXP
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
NEM
31/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AXP
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
NEM
-2.68
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AXP
Insiders 22.6%Institutions 65.8%Retail & Other 11.6%
No. of Institutional Holders3,692
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
NEM
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 82.2%Retail & Other 17.5%
No. of Institutional Holders2,555
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AXP
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$4,054
@ $176.26 · 2025-04-09
ANGELAKIS MICHAEL J
Director
$998,593
@ $269.89 · 2025-03-07
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
NEM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
CONGER HARRY M IV
Director
$400,335
@ $42.15 · 2024-11-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AXP
1
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $130.89M
MCNEAL GLENDA G
Officer
$2.39M
@ $339.36 · 2026-06-15
LIEBERMAN QUINN JESSICA
Officer
$909,661
@ $300.02 · 2026-03-06
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$4.77M
@ $340.67 · 2026-02-19
GROSFIELD HOWARD M
Officer
$2.82M
@ $346.73 · 2026-02-12
RADHAKRISHNAN RAVIKUMAR S
Chief Technology Officer
$5.35M
@ $356.58 · 2026-02-09
SEEGER LAUREEN E
Officer
$4.60M
@ $360.99 · 2026-02-09
PICKETT DENISE
Officer
$8.35M
@ $356.91 · 2026-02-05
MARRS ANNA
Officer
$9.60M
@ $350.01 · 2026-02-05
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$538,902
@ $384.93 · 2025-12-12
RUTLEDGE ELIZABETH
Officer
$18.01M
@ $360.21 · 2025-10-31
TABISH DOUGLAS J
Officer
$894,359
@ $355.61 · 2025-10-23
PICKETT DENISE
Officer
$1.75M
@ $350.73 · 2025-10-22
SQUERI STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$37.03M
@ $329.86 · 2025-09-04
HERENA MONIQUE
Officer
$2.83M
@ $325.88 · 2025-09-03
BUCKMINSTER DOUGLAS E
Officer
$7.67M
@ $326.37 · 2025-09-02
SEEGER LAUREEN E
Officer
$23.37M
@ $296.90 · 2025-08-06
MARRS ANNA
Officer
$1.71M
@ $310.77 · 2025-07-29
MCNEAL GLENDA G
Officer
$15.47M
@ $309.50 · 2025-07-29
MARQUEZ RAFAEL
Officer
$3.56M
@ $296.93 · 2025-05-20
GROSFIELD HOWARD M
Officer
$2.60M
@ $275.50 · 2025-05-06
MCNEAL GLENDA G
Officer
$799,009
@ $264.66 · 2025-04-29
MARRS ANNA
President
$6.32M
@ $287.88 · 2025-03-04
LIEBERMAN QUINN JESSICA
Officer
$897,590
@ $296.43 · 2025-02-26
MCNEAL GLENDA G
Officer
$2.29M
@ $309.96 · 2025-02-11
SQUERI STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$16.24M
@ $319.45 · 2025-02-06
PICKETT DENISE
Officer
$7.25M
@ $318.69 · 2025-02-05
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$3.53M
@ $317.01 · 2025-02-05
RADHAKRISHNAN RAVIKUMAR S
Chief Technology Officer
$3.03M
@ $319.17 · 2025-02-05
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$4.77M
@ $313.94 · 2025-01-28
LE CAILLEC CHRISTOPHE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.82M
@ $303.48 · 2024-11-27
HERENA MONIQUE
Officer
$374,010
@ $287.70 · 2024-11-07
SQUERI STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$48.90M
@ $286.57 · 2024-11-07
BUCKMINSTER DOUGLAS E
Officer
$3.55M
@ $270.98 · 2024-10-29
WILLIAMS ANRE D.
Officer
$21.05M
@ $270.26 · 2024-10-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
NEM
3
Sells (3M)
21
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.10M
TOTH PETER
Officer
$277,140
@ $92.38 · 2026-07-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$315,960
@ $105.32 · 2026-06-01
VILJOEN NATASCHA
Chief Executive Officer
$408,852
@ $105.32 · 2026-06-01
WEXLER PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$1.47M
@ $110.11 · 2026-05-01
THORNTON DAVID JOHN
Officer
$252,813
@ $110.11 · 2026-05-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$330,330
@ $110.11 · 2026-05-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$339,270
@ $113.09 · 2026-04-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$324,000
@ $108.00 · 2026-03-18
FRY DAVID JAMES
Officer
$2.05M
@ $111.45 · 2026-03-16
THORNTON DAVID JOHN
Officer
$973,487
@ $120.78 · 2026-03-03
RODGERS MARK C
Officer
$164,382
@ $120.78 · 2026-03-03
THORNTON DAVID JOHN
Officer
$123,796
@ $131.14 · 2026-03-02
RODGERS MARK C
Officer
$268,968
@ $131.14 · 2026-03-02
RODGERS MARK C
Officer
$577,590
@ $130.00 · 2026-02-27
RODGERS MARK C
Officer
$643,375
@ $125.00 · 2026-02-25
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$192,109
@ $92.36 · 2025-12-01
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$168,397
@ $80.96 · 2025-11-03
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$406,700
@ $81.34 · 2025-11-03
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$176,779
@ $84.99 · 2025-10-01
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$154,923
@ $74.59 · 2025-09-02
TABOLT BRIAN
Officer
$477,160
@ $68.02 · 2025-08-06
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$132,222
@ $63.66 · 2025-08-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$190,980
@ $63.66 · 2025-08-01
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$122,024
@ $58.75 · 2025-07-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$176,250
@ $58.75 · 2025-07-01
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$112,345
@ $54.09 · 2025-06-02
TOTH PETER
Officer
$162,270
@ $54.09 · 2025-06-02
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$106,924
@ $51.48 · 2025-05-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$154,440
@ $51.48 · 2025-05-01
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$100,651
@ $48.46 · 2025-04-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$145,380
@ $48.46 · 2025-04-01
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$90,786
@ $43.71 · 2025-03-03
TOTH PETER
Officer
$131,130
@ $43.71 · 2025-03-03
VILJOEN NATASCHA
Chief Operating Officer
$340,894
@ $43.71 · 2025-03-03
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$89,083
@ $42.89 · 2025-02-03
TOTH PETER
Officer
$128,670
@ $42.89 · 2025-02-03
VILJOEN NATASCHA
Chief Operating Officer
$386,010
@ $42.89 · 2025-02-03
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$83,080
@ $40.00 · 2025-01-10
VILJOEN NATASCHA
Chief Operating Officer
$360,000
@ $40.00 · 2025-01-10
TOTH PETER
Officer
$120,000
@ $40.00 · 2025-01-10
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$540,670
@ $41.59 · 2024-12-02
VILJOEN NATASCHA
Chief Operating Officer
$374,310
@ $41.59 · 2024-12-02
TOTH PETER
Officer
$124,770
@ $41.59 · 2024-12-02
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$590,850
@ $45.45 · 2024-11-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$136,350
@ $45.45 · 2024-11-01
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$1.08M
@ $53.81 · 2024-10-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$161,430
@ $53.81 · 2024-10-01
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$1.05M
@ $52.47 · 2024-09-03
TOTH PETER
Officer
$157,410
@ $52.47 · 2024-09-03
CAGE JOSHUA
Officer
$49,150
@ $49.15 · 2024-08-14
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AXP
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
NEM
FearGreed
😐Neutral(44/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AXP
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
NEM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (44)
View AXP Full AnalysisView NEM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AXP vs NEM

Is American Express Company or Newmont Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, AXP trades at a 29.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $477 vs. price $336), compared to NEM's -121.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $42 vs. $94).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, American Express Company or Newmont Corporation?

AXP scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while NEM scores 31/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is American Express Company in financial distress?

AXP's Altman Z-Score of 0.9 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. NEM scores 4.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, American Express Company or Newmont Corporation?

NEM earns 25.6% ROIC versus AXP's 12.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, American Express Company's or Newmont Corporation's?

AXP's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to NEM's 85/100 (Very Safe). AXP has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.