Compare StocksAXP vs FTV

American Express Company (AXP) vs Fortive Corporation (FTV): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, AXP is undervalued at $338, with a DCF intrinsic value of $484 and a margin of safety of 30%. FTV is overvalued at $61, with an intrinsic value of $30 and a margin of safety of -106%. Of the two, AXP has the wider margin of safety.

AXP
American Express Company
$338.00
VS
FTV
Fortive Corporation
$61.03

Rewards

AXP
  • Gross margin of 62.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • American Express Company scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
FTV
  • Gross margin of 63.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • PEG ratio of 0.98 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

AXP
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.93 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 17 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 5.9% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
FTV
  • FCF yield of 5.1% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Trailing P/E of 35.9x is 43% above the historical average of 25.2x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AXP
FTV
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$953.61M
N/A
FCF Yield
5.13%
21.11
Trailing P/E
35.90
16.77
Forward P/E
18.95
Quality & Moat
12.23%
ROIC
6.20%
34.42%
ROE
6.81%
62.76%
Gross Margin
63.25%
1.62
PEG Ratio
0.98
Balance Sheet Safety
0.19
Net Debt / Equity
0.53
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.71
1.12%
Dividend Yield
0.33%
AXP: 6Ties: 2FTV: 1
AXPFTV

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AXP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

FTV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AXP
$6.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$23.29B
Δ Market Cap
+$144.01B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
FTV
$0.11
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$1.97B
Δ Market Cap
+$216.3M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AXP
30.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 30.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $338.00
Fair Value: $483.58
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
FTV
106.3% Overvalued
Price is 106.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $61.03
Fair Value: $29.58
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AXP

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

FTV

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $61?

+16.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.6%

The market implies +16.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AXP
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
FTV
49/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AXP
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
FTV
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AXP
Insiders 22.3%Institutions 65.3%Retail & Other 12.3%
No. of Institutional Holders3,664
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
FTV
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 111.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,136
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AXP
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$4,054
@ $176.26 · 2025-04-09
ANGELAKIS MICHAEL J
Director
$998,593
@ $269.89 · 2025-03-07
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
FTV
1
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.00M
LASSITER WRIGHT III
Director
$257.00
@ $64.25 · 2026-03-26
LASSITER WRIGHT III
Director
$257.00
@ $64.25 · 2025-12-26
OKERSTROM MARK D
Chief Financial Officer
$1.00M
@ $47.03 · 2025-08-01
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AXP
0
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $145.68M
LIEBERMAN QUINN JESSICA
Officer
$909,661
@ $300.02 · 2026-03-06
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$4.77M
@ $340.67 · 2026-02-19
GROSFIELD HOWARD M
Officer
$2.82M
@ $346.73 · 2026-02-12
RADHAKRISHNAN RAVIKUMAR S
Chief Technology Officer
$5.35M
@ $356.58 · 2026-02-09
SEEGER LAUREEN E
Officer
$4.60M
@ $360.99 · 2026-02-09
MARRS ANNA
Officer
$9.60M
@ $350.01 · 2026-02-05
PICKETT DENISE
Officer
$8.35M
@ $356.91 · 2026-02-05
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$538,902
@ $384.93 · 2025-12-12
RUTLEDGE ELIZABETH
Officer
$18.01M
@ $360.21 · 2025-10-31
TABISH DOUGLAS J
Officer
$894,359
@ $355.61 · 2025-10-23
PICKETT DENISE
Officer
$1.75M
@ $350.73 · 2025-10-22
SQUERI STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$37.03M
@ $329.86 · 2025-09-04
HERENA MONIQUE
Officer
$2.83M
@ $325.88 · 2025-09-03
BUCKMINSTER DOUGLAS E
Officer
$7.67M
@ $326.37 · 2025-09-02
SEEGER LAUREEN E
Officer
$23.37M
@ $296.90 · 2025-08-06
MARRS ANNA
Officer
$1.71M
@ $310.77 · 2025-07-29
MCNEAL GLENDA G
Officer
$15.47M
@ $309.50 · 2025-07-29
MARQUEZ RAFAEL
Officer
$3.56M
@ $296.93 · 2025-05-20
GROSFIELD HOWARD M
Officer
$2.60M
@ $275.50 · 2025-05-06
MCNEAL GLENDA G
Officer
$799,009
@ $264.66 · 2025-04-29
MARRS ANNA
President
$6.32M
@ $287.88 · 2025-03-04
LIEBERMAN QUINN JESSICA
Officer
$897,590
@ $296.43 · 2025-02-26
MCNEAL GLENDA G
Officer
$2.29M
@ $309.96 · 2025-02-11
SQUERI STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$16.24M
@ $319.45 · 2025-02-06
RADHAKRISHNAN RAVIKUMAR S
Chief Technology Officer
$3.03M
@ $319.17 · 2025-02-05
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$3.53M
@ $317.01 · 2025-02-05
PICKETT DENISE
Officer
$7.25M
@ $318.69 · 2025-02-05
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$4.77M
@ $313.94 · 2025-01-28
LE CAILLEC CHRISTOPHE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.82M
@ $303.48 · 2024-11-27
HERENA MONIQUE
Officer
$374,010
@ $287.70 · 2024-11-07
SQUERI STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$48.90M
@ $286.57 · 2024-11-07
BUCKMINSTER DOUGLAS E
Officer
$3.55M
@ $270.98 · 2024-10-29
WILLIAMS ANRE D.
Officer
$21.05M
@ $270.26 · 2024-10-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
FTV
1
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $6.40M
UNDERWOOD PETER C
Officer
$2.89M
@ $60.81 · 2026-05-04
MITCHELL KATE D
Director
$416,023
@ $58.34 · 2026-02-18
UNDERWOOD PETER C
Officer
$2.98M
@ $51.28 · 2025-11-10
WALKER STACEY A.
Officer
$110,367
@ $50.35 · 2025-10-31
LICO JAMES A
Chief Executive Officer
$12.67M
@ $72.40 · 2025-05-15
UNDERWOOD PETER C
Officer
$1.06M
@ $73.88 · 2025-05-12
WALKER STACEY A.
Officer
$237,308
@ $79.05 · 2025-02-28
MCLAUGHLIN CHARLES E.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.53M
@ $78.86 · 2025-02-28
WALKER STACEY A.
Officer
$457,998
@ $80.52 · 2025-02-26
LICO JAMES A
Chief Executive Officer
$15.76M
@ $80.38 · 2025-02-24
UNDERWOOD PETER C
General Counsel
$382,900
@ $76.58 · 2024-11-11
WALKER STACEY A.
Officer
$12.32M
@ $71.71 · 2024-11-01
MCLAUGHLIN CHARLES E.
Chief Financial Officer
$508,142
@ $74.03 · 2024-09-13
SCHWARZ JONATHAN L.
Officer
$1.05M
@ $73.80 · 2024-09-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AXP
FearGreed
😐Neutral(58/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
FTV
FearGreed
😏Greed(64/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AXP
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
FTV
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
View AXP Full AnalysisView FTV Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AXP vs FTV

Is American Express Company or Fortive Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, AXP trades at a 30.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $484 vs. price $338), compared to FTV's -106.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $30 vs. $61).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, American Express Company or Fortive Corporation?

AXP scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while FTV scores 49/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is American Express Company in financial distress?

AXP's Altman Z-Score of 0.9 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. FTV scores 3.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, American Express Company or Fortive Corporation?

AXP earns 12.2% ROIC versus FTV's 6.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, American Express Company's or Fortive Corporation's?

AXP's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to FTV's 85/100 (Very Safe). AXP has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.