Compare StocksAXP vs EW

American Express Company (AXP) vs Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, AXP is undervalued at $338, with a DCF intrinsic value of $484 and a margin of safety of 30%. EW is overvalued at $87, with an intrinsic value of $56 and a margin of safety of -55%. Of the two, AXP has the wider margin of safety.

AXP
American Express Company
$338.00
VS
EW
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
$87.36

Rewards

AXP
  • Gross margin of 62.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • American Express Company scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
EW
  • Edwards Lifesciences Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 77.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Edwards Lifesciences Corporation scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

AXP
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.93 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 17 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 5.9% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
EW
  • FCF yield of 2.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 47.2x is 57% above the historical average of 30.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.13 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AXP
EW
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$1.33B
N/A
FCF Yield
2.65%
21.11
Trailing P/E
47.22
16.77
Forward P/E
25.94
Quality & Moat
12.23%
ROIC
14.09%
34.42%
ROE
10.46%
62.76%
Gross Margin
77.87%
1.62
PEG Ratio
2.13
Balance Sheet Safety
0.19
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
-1.56
1.12%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
AXP: 5Ties: 1EW: 3
AXPEW

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AXP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

EW

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AXP
$6.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$23.29B
Δ Market Cap
+$144.01B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
EW
$0.62
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$6.65B
Δ Market Cap
+$4.12B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AXP
30.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 30.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $338.00
Fair Value: $483.58
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
EW
54.8% Overvalued
Price is 54.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $87.36
Fair Value: $56.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AXP

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

EW

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $87?

+18.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +15.5%

The market implies +18.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AXP
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
EW
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AXP
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
EW
-2.57
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AXP
Insiders 22.3%Institutions 65.3%Retail & Other 12.3%
No. of Institutional Holders3,664
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
EW
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 94.1%Retail & Other 5.7%
No. of Institutional Holders1,866
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AXP
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$4,054
@ $176.26 · 2025-04-09
ANGELAKIS MICHAEL J
Director
$998,593
@ $269.89 · 2025-03-07
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
EW
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AXP
0
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $145.68M
LIEBERMAN QUINN JESSICA
Officer
$909,661
@ $300.02 · 2026-03-06
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$4.77M
@ $340.67 · 2026-02-19
GROSFIELD HOWARD M
Officer
$2.82M
@ $346.73 · 2026-02-12
RADHAKRISHNAN RAVIKUMAR S
Chief Technology Officer
$5.35M
@ $356.58 · 2026-02-09
SEEGER LAUREEN E
Officer
$4.60M
@ $360.99 · 2026-02-09
MARRS ANNA
Officer
$9.60M
@ $350.01 · 2026-02-05
PICKETT DENISE
Officer
$8.35M
@ $356.91 · 2026-02-05
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$538,902
@ $384.93 · 2025-12-12
RUTLEDGE ELIZABETH
Officer
$18.01M
@ $360.21 · 2025-10-31
TABISH DOUGLAS J
Officer
$894,359
@ $355.61 · 2025-10-23
PICKETT DENISE
Officer
$1.75M
@ $350.73 · 2025-10-22
SQUERI STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$37.03M
@ $329.86 · 2025-09-04
HERENA MONIQUE
Officer
$2.83M
@ $325.88 · 2025-09-03
BUCKMINSTER DOUGLAS E
Officer
$7.67M
@ $326.37 · 2025-09-02
SEEGER LAUREEN E
Officer
$23.37M
@ $296.90 · 2025-08-06
MARRS ANNA
Officer
$1.71M
@ $310.77 · 2025-07-29
MCNEAL GLENDA G
Officer
$15.47M
@ $309.50 · 2025-07-29
MARQUEZ RAFAEL
Officer
$3.56M
@ $296.93 · 2025-05-20
GROSFIELD HOWARD M
Officer
$2.60M
@ $275.50 · 2025-05-06
MCNEAL GLENDA G
Officer
$799,009
@ $264.66 · 2025-04-29
MARRS ANNA
President
$6.32M
@ $287.88 · 2025-03-04
LIEBERMAN QUINN JESSICA
Officer
$897,590
@ $296.43 · 2025-02-26
MCNEAL GLENDA G
Officer
$2.29M
@ $309.96 · 2025-02-11
SQUERI STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$16.24M
@ $319.45 · 2025-02-06
RADHAKRISHNAN RAVIKUMAR S
Chief Technology Officer
$3.03M
@ $319.17 · 2025-02-05
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$3.53M
@ $317.01 · 2025-02-05
PICKETT DENISE
Officer
$7.25M
@ $318.69 · 2025-02-05
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$4.77M
@ $313.94 · 2025-01-28
LE CAILLEC CHRISTOPHE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.82M
@ $303.48 · 2024-11-27
HERENA MONIQUE
Officer
$374,010
@ $287.70 · 2024-11-07
SQUERI STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$48.90M
@ $286.57 · 2024-11-07
BUCKMINSTER DOUGLAS E
Officer
$3.55M
@ $270.98 · 2024-10-29
WILLIAMS ANRE D.
Officer
$21.05M
@ $270.26 · 2024-10-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
EW
8
Sells (3M)
27
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $15.81M
DAHL ANDREW M
Officer
$48,853
@ $86.16 · 2026-05-29
CHOPRA DAVEEN
Officer
$126,905
@ $84.60 · 2026-05-22
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$50,307
@ $81.14 · 2026-05-18
MARKOWITZ WAYNE
Officer
$47,280
@ $79.73 · 2026-05-11
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$170,160
@ $83.49 · 2026-05-04
ULLEM SCOTT B
Chief Financial Officer
$1.04M
@ $80.04 · 2026-04-09
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$82,523
@ $80.98 · 2026-04-06
BOBO DONALD E JR
Officer
$1.82M
@ $80.16 · 2026-04-02
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$87,004
@ $85.38 · 2026-03-11
ULLEM SCOTT B
Chief Financial Officer
$1.10M
@ $84.92 · 2026-03-11
BOBO DONALD E JR
Officer
$974,430
@ $85.93 · 2026-03-02
BOBO DONALD E JR
Officer
$2.01M
@ $83.84 · 2026-02-25
ZOVIGHIAN BERNARD J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.72M
@ $76.67 · 2026-02-12
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$87,332
@ $85.70 · 2026-01-09
BOBO DONALD E JR
Officer
$971,429
@ $85.66 · 2026-01-06
STONE HEISZ LESLIE
Director
$218,120
@ $83.41 · 2025-12-12
BOBO DONALD E JR
Officer
$953,748
@ $83.76 · 2025-12-12
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$85,625
@ $84.03 · 2025-12-12
CHOPRA DAVEEN
Officer
$168,750
@ $84.38 · 2025-12-11
BOBO DONALD E JR
Officer
$950,581
@ $83.83 · 2025-12-10
ULLEM SCOTT B
Chief Financial Officer
$650,412
@ $84.47 · 2025-12-09
MARKOWITZ WAYNE
Officer
$50,144
@ $86.01 · 2025-12-08
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$84,196
@ $82.55 · 2025-11-10
ULLEM SCOTT B
Chief Financial Officer
$1.08M
@ $83.08 · 2025-11-10
CHOPRA DAVEEN
Officer
$204,865
@ $81.95 · 2025-08-25
WOOD LARRY L
Officer
$698,679
@ $78.06 · 2025-08-18
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$326,900
@ $79.46 · 2025-07-28
WOOD LARRY L
Officer
$673,268
@ $75.23 · 2025-06-16
BOBO DONALD E JR
Officer
$198,911
@ $77.40 · 2025-06-02
CHOPRA DAVEEN
Officer
$112,612
@ $75.07 · 2025-05-22
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$24,560
@ $74.42 · 2025-05-09
ULLEM SCOTT B
Chief Financial Officer
$837,035
@ $74.40 · 2025-05-09
MARKOWITZ WAYNE
Officer
$20,121
@ $75.08 · 2025-05-07
ZOVIGHIAN BERNARD J
Chief Executive Officer
$447,977
@ $74.91 · 2025-05-05
BOBO DONALD E JR
Officer
$663,196
@ $69.81 · 2025-04-14
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$21,183
@ $70.61 · 2025-04-08
ULLEM SCOTT B
Chief Financial Officer
$797,267
@ $70.87 · 2025-03-26
BOBO DONALD E JR
Officer
$645,624
@ $67.96 · 2025-03-13
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$27,792
@ $69.48 · 2025-03-10
ZOVIGHIAN BERNARD J
Chief Executive Officer
$428,448
@ $69.51 · 2025-03-10
ULLEM SCOTT B
Chief Financial Officer
$796,327
@ $70.78 · 2025-02-28
LORANGER STEVEN R
Director
$438,576
@ $76.42 · 2025-02-14
STONE HEISZ LESLIE
Director
$435,371
@ $75.86 · 2025-02-13
BOBO DONALD E JR
Officer
$492,363
@ $75.75 · 2025-02-13
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$38,170
@ $76.34 · 2025-02-13
ULLEM SCOTT B
Chief Financial Officer
$852,272
@ $75.76 · 2025-02-13
BOBO DONALD E JR
Officer
$343,736
@ $68.75 · 2025-01-16
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$34,382
@ $68.76 · 2025-01-16
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$185,196
@ $74.08 · 2024-12-16
BOBO DONALD E JR
Officer
$358,750
@ $71.75 · 2024-12-09
ULLEM SCOTT B
Chief Financial Officer
$806,406
@ $71.68 · 2024-12-09
CHOPRA DAVEEN
Officer
$128,223
@ $73.27 · 2024-12-06
MARKOWITZ WAYNE
Officer
$42,716
@ $73.27 · 2024-12-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AXP
FearGreed
😐Neutral(58/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
EW
FearGreed
😏Greed(64/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AXP
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
EW
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
View AXP Full AnalysisView EW Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AXP vs EW

Is American Express Company or Edwards Lifesciences Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, AXP trades at a 30.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $484 vs. price $338), compared to EW's -54.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $56 vs. $87).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, American Express Company or Edwards Lifesciences Corporation?

AXP scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while EW scores 80/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is American Express Company in financial distress?

AXP's Altman Z-Score of 0.9 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. EW scores 11.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, American Express Company or Edwards Lifesciences Corporation?

EW earns 14.1% ROIC versus AXP's 12.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.