Compare StocksAXP vs ECL

American Express Company (AXP) vs Ecolab Inc. (ECL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, AXP is undervalued at $336, with a DCF intrinsic value of $477 and a margin of safety of 30%. ECL is overvalued at $278, with an intrinsic value of $185 and a margin of safety of -50%. Of the two, AXP has the wider margin of safety.

AXP
American Express Company
$336.25
VS
ECL
Ecolab Inc.
$277.63

Rewards

AXP
  • Gross margin of 62.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • American Express Company scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
ECL
  • Ecolab Inc. scores 71/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 21.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.39 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

AXP
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.93 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $2.4M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 5.9% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
ECL
  • PEG ratio of 2.86 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AXP
ECL
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
N/A
N/A
FCF Yield
N/A
20.40
Trailing P/E
37.32
16.72
Forward P/E
29.42
Quality & Moat
12.19%
ROIC
10.23%
34.38%
ROE
21.96%
62.34%
Gross Margin
44.21%
1.57
PEG Ratio
2.86
Balance Sheet Safety
0.39
Net Debt / Equity
0.85
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.08
1.13%
Dividend Yield
1.05%
AXP: 8Ties: 1ECL: 0
AXPECL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AXP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

ECL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AXP
$6.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$23.29B
Δ Market Cap
+$144.01B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ECL
$9.25
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$3.53B
Δ Market Cap
+$32.62B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AXP
29.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 29.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $336.25
Fair Value: $477.26
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ECL
27.2% Overvalued
Price is 27.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $277.63
Fair Value: $218.31
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AXP

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

ECL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AXP
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
ECL
71/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AXP
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ECL
-2.50
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AXP
Insiders 22.6%Institutions 65.8%Retail & Other 11.6%
No. of Institutional Holders3,692
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ECL
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 93.4%Retail & Other 6.5%
No. of Institutional Holders2,289
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AXP
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$4,054
@ $176.26 · 2025-04-09
ANGELAKIS MICHAEL J
Director
$998,593
@ $269.89 · 2025-03-07
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ECL
3
Buys (3M)
6
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.08M
CLARK BENJAMIN M.
Officer
$263,831
@ $263.83 · 2026-06-11
DOUKERIS MICHEL
Director
$2.00M
@ $258.00 · 2026-06-10
MACLENNAN DAVID W
Director
$250,650
@ $250.65 · 2026-05-13
MACLENNAN DAVID W
Director
$205,530
@ $256.91 · 2026-05-04
MACLENNAN DAVID W
Director
$193,198
@ $257.60 · 2025-12-08
MACLENNAN DAVID W
Director
$167,108
@ $278.51 · 2025-08-13
MACLENNAN DAVID W
Director
$125,872
@ $251.74 · 2025-05-07
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AXP
1
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $130.89M
MCNEAL GLENDA G
Officer
$2.39M
@ $339.36 · 2026-06-15
LIEBERMAN QUINN JESSICA
Officer
$909,661
@ $300.02 · 2026-03-06
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$4.77M
@ $340.67 · 2026-02-19
GROSFIELD HOWARD M
Officer
$2.82M
@ $346.73 · 2026-02-12
RADHAKRISHNAN RAVIKUMAR S
Chief Technology Officer
$5.35M
@ $356.58 · 2026-02-09
SEEGER LAUREEN E
Officer
$4.60M
@ $360.99 · 2026-02-09
PICKETT DENISE
Officer
$8.35M
@ $356.91 · 2026-02-05
MARRS ANNA
Officer
$9.60M
@ $350.01 · 2026-02-05
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$538,902
@ $384.93 · 2025-12-12
RUTLEDGE ELIZABETH
Officer
$18.01M
@ $360.21 · 2025-10-31
TABISH DOUGLAS J
Officer
$894,359
@ $355.61 · 2025-10-23
PICKETT DENISE
Officer
$1.75M
@ $350.73 · 2025-10-22
SQUERI STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$37.03M
@ $329.86 · 2025-09-04
HERENA MONIQUE
Officer
$2.83M
@ $325.88 · 2025-09-03
BUCKMINSTER DOUGLAS E
Officer
$7.67M
@ $326.37 · 2025-09-02
SEEGER LAUREEN E
Officer
$23.37M
@ $296.90 · 2025-08-06
MARRS ANNA
Officer
$1.71M
@ $310.77 · 2025-07-29
MCNEAL GLENDA G
Officer
$15.47M
@ $309.50 · 2025-07-29
MARQUEZ RAFAEL
Officer
$3.56M
@ $296.93 · 2025-05-20
GROSFIELD HOWARD M
Officer
$2.60M
@ $275.50 · 2025-05-06
MCNEAL GLENDA G
Officer
$799,009
@ $264.66 · 2025-04-29
MARRS ANNA
President
$6.32M
@ $287.88 · 2025-03-04
LIEBERMAN QUINN JESSICA
Officer
$897,590
@ $296.43 · 2025-02-26
MCNEAL GLENDA G
Officer
$2.29M
@ $309.96 · 2025-02-11
SQUERI STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$16.24M
@ $319.45 · 2025-02-06
PICKETT DENISE
Officer
$7.25M
@ $318.69 · 2025-02-05
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$3.53M
@ $317.01 · 2025-02-05
RADHAKRISHNAN RAVIKUMAR S
Chief Technology Officer
$3.03M
@ $319.17 · 2025-02-05
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$4.77M
@ $313.94 · 2025-01-28
LE CAILLEC CHRISTOPHE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.82M
@ $303.48 · 2024-11-27
HERENA MONIQUE
Officer
$374,010
@ $287.70 · 2024-11-07
SQUERI STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$48.90M
@ $286.57 · 2024-11-07
BUCKMINSTER DOUGLAS E
Officer
$3.55M
@ $270.98 · 2024-10-29
WILLIAMS ANRE D.
Officer
$21.05M
@ $270.26 · 2024-10-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ECL
2
Sells (3M)
12
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.52M
BROWN DARRELL R
Officer
$2.61M
@ $260.89 · 2026-06-09
VAUTRINOT SUZANNE M.
Director
$266,040
@ $264.98 · 2026-05-27
COOK GREGORY B
Officer
$1.07M
@ $304.25 · 2026-02-26
MCKIBBEN TRACY B.
Director
$390,455
@ $308.66 · 2026-02-25
BECK CHRISTOPHE
Chief Executive Officer
$6.15M
@ $307.37 · 2026-02-24
ALFANO NICHOLAS J
Officer
$2.88M
@ $303.58 · 2026-02-17
REICH VICTORIA J
Director
$301,080
@ $301.08 · 2026-02-13
BRADWAY JENNIFER J
Officer
$185,132
@ $302.01 · 2026-02-13
DE BOO ALEXANDER A
Officer
$381,452
@ $268.25 · 2025-11-24
BECK CHRISTOPHE
Chief Executive Officer
$5.68M
@ $261.41 · 2025-11-12
VAUTRINOT SUZANNE M.
Director
$383,401
@ $283.16 · 2025-08-19
BRADWAY JENNIFER J
Officer
$225,379
@ $279.28 · 2025-08-13
REICH VICTORIA J
Director
$352,300
@ $271.00 · 2025-06-12
COOK GREGORY B
Officer
$565,202
@ $253.00 · 2025-05-15
ALFANO NICHOLAS J
Officer
$2.52M
@ $253.75 · 2025-05-07
BERGER LARRY L
Chief Technology Officer
$2.90M
@ $266.95 · 2025-02-26
BRADWAY JENNIFER J
Officer
$228,866
@ $267.37 · 2025-02-25
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AXP
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ECL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AXP
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
ECL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
View AXP Full AnalysisView ECL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AXP vs ECL

Is American Express Company or Ecolab Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, AXP trades at a 29.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $477 vs. price $336), compared to ECL's -50.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $185 vs. $278).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, American Express Company or Ecolab Inc.?

AXP scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while ECL scores 71/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is American Express Company in financial distress?

AXP's Altman Z-Score of 0.9 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ECL scores 4.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, American Express Company or Ecolab Inc.?

AXP earns 12.2% ROIC versus ECL's 10.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, American Express Company's or Ecolab Inc.'s?

ECL's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to AXP's 94/100 (Very Safe). ECL has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.