Compare StocksAXP vs CMS

American Express Company (AXP) vs CMS Energy Corporation (CMS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, AXP is undervalued at $338, with a DCF intrinsic value of $484 and a margin of safety of 30%. CMS is overvalued at $73, with an intrinsic value of $12 and a margin of safety of -515%. Of the two, AXP has the wider margin of safety.

AXP
American Express Company
$338.00
VS
CMS
CMS Energy Corporation
$73.38

Rewards

AXP
  • Gross margin of 62.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • American Express Company scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
CMS
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.38 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

AXP
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.93 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 17 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 5.9% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
CMS
  • CMS Energy Corporation scores only 25/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • PEG ratio of 2.86 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • High leverage (1.88x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AXP
CMS
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$-2.16B
N/A
FCF Yield
-9.51%
21.11
Trailing P/E
20.33
16.77
Forward P/E
17.59
Quality & Moat
12.23%
ROIC
4.74%
34.42%
ROE
10.37%
62.76%
Gross Margin
40.55%
1.62
PEG Ratio
2.86
Balance Sheet Safety
0.19
Net Debt / Equity
1.88
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
6.20
1.12%
Dividend Yield
3.08%
AXP: 5Ties: 3CMS: 1
AXPCMS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AXP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

CMS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AXP
$6.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$23.29B
Δ Market Cap
+$144.01B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
CMS
$2.73
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.09B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.98B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AXP
30.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 30.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $338.00
Fair Value: $483.58
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
CMS
514.9% Overvalued
Price is 514.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $73.38
Fair Value: $11.93
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AXP

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

CMS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AXP
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
CMS
25/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AXP
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
CMS
-2.43
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AXP
Insiders 22.3%Institutions 65.3%Retail & Other 12.3%
No. of Institutional Holders3,664
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
CMS
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 100.5%
No. of Institutional Holders1,127
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AXP
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$4,054
@ $176.26 · 2025-04-09
ANGELAKIS MICHAEL J
Director
$998,593
@ $269.89 · 2025-03-07
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
CMS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $153,398
LEOPOLD DIANE
Director
$153,398
@ $76.70 · 2026-02-25
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AXP
0
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $145.68M
LIEBERMAN QUINN JESSICA
Officer
$909,661
@ $300.02 · 2026-03-06
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$4.77M
@ $340.67 · 2026-02-19
GROSFIELD HOWARD M
Officer
$2.82M
@ $346.73 · 2026-02-12
RADHAKRISHNAN RAVIKUMAR S
Chief Technology Officer
$5.35M
@ $356.58 · 2026-02-09
SEEGER LAUREEN E
Officer
$4.60M
@ $360.99 · 2026-02-09
MARRS ANNA
Officer
$9.60M
@ $350.01 · 2026-02-05
PICKETT DENISE
Officer
$8.35M
@ $356.91 · 2026-02-05
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$538,902
@ $384.93 · 2025-12-12
RUTLEDGE ELIZABETH
Officer
$18.01M
@ $360.21 · 2025-10-31
TABISH DOUGLAS J
Officer
$894,359
@ $355.61 · 2025-10-23
PICKETT DENISE
Officer
$1.75M
@ $350.73 · 2025-10-22
SQUERI STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$37.03M
@ $329.86 · 2025-09-04
HERENA MONIQUE
Officer
$2.83M
@ $325.88 · 2025-09-03
BUCKMINSTER DOUGLAS E
Officer
$7.67M
@ $326.37 · 2025-09-02
SEEGER LAUREEN E
Officer
$23.37M
@ $296.90 · 2025-08-06
MARRS ANNA
Officer
$1.71M
@ $310.77 · 2025-07-29
MCNEAL GLENDA G
Officer
$15.47M
@ $309.50 · 2025-07-29
MARQUEZ RAFAEL
Officer
$3.56M
@ $296.93 · 2025-05-20
GROSFIELD HOWARD M
Officer
$2.60M
@ $275.50 · 2025-05-06
MCNEAL GLENDA G
Officer
$799,009
@ $264.66 · 2025-04-29
MARRS ANNA
President
$6.32M
@ $287.88 · 2025-03-04
LIEBERMAN QUINN JESSICA
Officer
$897,590
@ $296.43 · 2025-02-26
MCNEAL GLENDA G
Officer
$2.29M
@ $309.96 · 2025-02-11
SQUERI STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$16.24M
@ $319.45 · 2025-02-06
RADHAKRISHNAN RAVIKUMAR S
Chief Technology Officer
$3.03M
@ $319.17 · 2025-02-05
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$3.53M
@ $317.01 · 2025-02-05
PICKETT DENISE
Officer
$7.25M
@ $318.69 · 2025-02-05
JOABAR RAYMOND D
Officer
$4.77M
@ $313.94 · 2025-01-28
LE CAILLEC CHRISTOPHE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.82M
@ $303.48 · 2024-11-27
HERENA MONIQUE
Officer
$374,010
@ $287.70 · 2024-11-07
SQUERI STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$48.90M
@ $286.57 · 2024-11-07
BUCKMINSTER DOUGLAS E
Officer
$3.55M
@ $270.98 · 2024-10-29
WILLIAMS ANRE D.
Officer
$21.05M
@ $270.26 · 2024-10-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
CMS
1
Sells (3M)
7
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.40M
HOFMEISTER BRANDON J
Officer
$222,930
@ $74.31 · 2026-05-26
MCINTOSH SCOTT B.
Officer
$136,859
@ $78.21 · 2026-03-02
HOFMEISTER BRANDON J
Officer
$312,940
@ $78.23 · 2026-02-27
RUSSELL JOHN G.
Director
$1.13M
@ $75.75 · 2026-02-20
HOFMEISTER BRANDON J
Officer
$289,882
@ $72.47 · 2025-11-03
SNYDER LAUREN Y
Officer
$158,199
@ $71.26 · 2025-09-05
HOFMEISTER BRANDON J
Officer
$147,246
@ $73.62 · 2025-08-08
HOFMEISTER BRANDON J
Officer
$161,790
@ $73.61 · 2025-05-06
HOFMEISTER BRANDON J
Officer
$147,540
@ $73.77 · 2025-03-03
WRIGHT LAURA H
Director
$174,609
@ $69.84 · 2025-02-19
MCINTOSH SCOTT B.
Officer
$467,392
@ $69.76 · 2025-02-13
RUSSELL JOHN G.
Director
$1.89M
@ $65.85 · 2024-12-19
HOFMEISTER BRANDON J
Officer
$134,443
@ $67.22 · 2024-12-13
MCINTOSH SCOTT B.
Officer
$64,116
@ $68.50 · 2024-11-21
HOFMEISTER BRANDON J
Officer
$136,345
@ $68.17 · 2024-11-18
HOFMEISTER BRANDON J
Officer
$137,709
@ $68.85 · 2024-09-04
RICH BRIAN F
Officer
$263,982
@ $66.00 · 2024-08-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AXP
FearGreed
😐Neutral(58/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
CMS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AXP
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
CMS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
View AXP Full AnalysisView CMS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AXP vs CMS

Is American Express Company or CMS Energy Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, AXP trades at a 30.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $484 vs. price $338), compared to CMS's -514.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $12 vs. $73).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, American Express Company or CMS Energy Corporation?

AXP scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while CMS scores 25/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is CMS Energy Corporation in financial distress?

CMS's Altman Z-Score of 0.9 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. AXP scores 0.9 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, American Express Company or CMS Energy Corporation?

AXP earns 12.2% ROIC versus CMS's 4.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, American Express Company's or CMS Energy Corporation's?

AXP's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to CMS's 69/100 (Safe). AXP has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

AXP vs CMS: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io