Compare StocksAVY vs BRK-B

Avery Dennison Corporation (AVY) vs Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, AVY is undervalued at $159, with a DCF intrinsic value of $237 and a margin of safety of 33%. BRK-B is undervalued at $489, with an intrinsic value of $644 and a margin of safety of 24%. Of the two, AVY has the wider margin of safety.

AVY
Avery Dennison Corporation
$158.68
VS
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$489.46

Rewards

AVY
  • Avery Dennison Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Avery Dennison Corporation scores 86/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

AVY
  • FCF yield of 6.7% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • High leverage (1.52x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 5.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AVY
BRK-B
Valuation
$809.05M
Free Cash Flow
$61.23B
6.67%
FCF Yield
5.80%
17.89
Trailing P/E
14.56
14.21
Forward P/E
22.79
Quality & Moat
14.72%
ROIC
4.96%
30.86%
ROE
10.50%
28.75%
Gross Margin
27.78%
1.92
PEG Ratio
10.06
Balance Sheet Safety
1.52
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.42
Net Debt / EBITDA
-2.28
2.36%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
AVY: 6Ties: 2BRK-B: 4
AVYBRK-B

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AVY

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AVY
$-0.60
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$1.07B
Δ Market Cap
$-644.1M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AVY
33.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 33.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $158.68
Fair Value: $237.43
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BRK-B
24.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 24.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $489.46
Fair Value: $643.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AVY

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $159?

+7.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.2%

The market implies +7.1% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +7.2%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $489?

+0.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.6%

The market implies +0.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AVY
86/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AVY
-2.57
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AVY
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 98.3%Retail & Other 1.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,132
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.3%Retail & Other 32.4%
No. of Institutional Holders5,905
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AVY
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BRK-B
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $250,545
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,545
@ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AVY
0
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.24M
BUTIER MITCHELL R
Director
$5.71M
@ $172.95 · 2026-03-12
BUTIER MITCHELL R
Director
$7.03M
@ $175.81 · 2026-03-10
BUTIER MITCHELL R
Director
$7.28M
@ $181.92 · 2026-03-06
WALKER IGNACIO J
Officer
$223,050
@ $192.95 · 2026-02-06
BUTIER MITCHELL R
Officer and Director
$2.36M
@ $181.85 · 2025-03-06
BUTIER MITCHELL R
Officer and Director
$1.50M
@ $186.19 · 2025-03-03
COLISTO NICHOLAS R.
Chief Technology Officer
$757,856
@ $206.00 · 2024-11-25
BUTIER MITCHELL R
Officer and Director
$3.70M
@ $216.43 · 2024-08-23
BUTIER MITCHELL R
Officer and Director
$4.26M
@ $213.04 · 2024-08-21
BUTIER MITCHELL R
Officer and Director
$4.25M
@ $212.40 · 2024-08-19
BUTIER MITCHELL R
Officer and Director
$2.75M
@ $211.29 · 2024-08-15
BUTIER MITCHELL R
Officer and Director
$1.24M
@ $207.39 · 2024-08-13
BUTIER MITCHELL R
Officer and Director
$1.24M
@ $206.77 · 2024-08-09
BUTIER MITCHELL R
Officer and Director
$1.24M
@ $206.12 · 2024-08-07
BUTIER MITCHELL R
Officer and Director
$2.71M
@ $208.47 · 2024-08-05
BUTIER MITCHELL R
Officer and Director
$4.31M
@ $215.40 · 2024-08-01
BUTIER MITCHELL R
Officer and Director
$4.28M
@ $214.13 · 2024-07-30
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AVY
FearGreed
😐Neutral(44/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BRK-B
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AVY
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (44)
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
View AVY Full AnalysisView BRK-B Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AVY vs BRK-B

Is Avery Dennison Corporation or Berkshire Hathaway Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, AVY trades at a 33.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $237 vs. price $159), compared to BRK-B's 24.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $644 vs. $489).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Avery Dennison Corporation or Berkshire Hathaway Inc.?

AVY scores 86/100 (Wide moat), while BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. in financial distress?

BRK-B's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. AVY scores 3.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Avery Dennison Corporation or Berkshire Hathaway Inc.?

Avery Dennison Corporation (AVY) generates a 6.7% free cash flow yield, compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc.'s 5.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Avery Dennison Corporation or Berkshire Hathaway Inc.?

AVY earns 14.7% ROIC versus BRK-B's 5.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.