Compare StocksAVGO vs TECH

Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) vs Bio-Techne Corporation (TECH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, AVGO is overvalued at $411, with a DCF intrinsic value of $258 and a margin of safety of -59%. TECH is overvalued at $58, with an intrinsic value of $20 and a margin of safety of -196%. Of the two, AVGO has the wider margin of safety.

AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
$411.35
VS
TECH
Bio-Techne Corporation
$57.94

Rewards

AVGO
  • Gross margin of 76.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 18.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $11.66 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
TECH
  • Gross margin of 66.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • PEG ratio of 0.77 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
  • Altman Z-Score of 10.13 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

AVGO
  • ROIC has declined by 6.5 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Share count has increased by 13% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • FCF yield of 1.4% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
TECH
  • ROIC has declined by 5.1 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AVGO
TECH
Valuation
$27.21B
Free Cash Flow
$299.85M
1.39%
FCF Yield
3.31%
68.22
Trailing P/E
82.77
21.26
Forward P/E
28.19
Quality & Moat
19.14%
ROIC
10.14%
37.28%
ROE
5.34%
76.28%
Gross Margin
66.40%
0.68
PEG Ratio
0.77
Balance Sheet Safety
0.52
Net Debt / Equity
0.04
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.08
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.21
0.69%
Dividend Yield
0.57%
AVGO: 8Ties: 1TECH: 3
AVGOTECH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AVGO

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TECH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AVGO
$97.03
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$14.50B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.41T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TECH
$-10.30
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$375.7M
Δ Market Cap
$-3.87B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AVGO
16.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 16.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $411.35
Fair Value: $489.83
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TECH
195.8% Overvalued
Price is 195.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $57.94
Fair Value: $19.59
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AVGO

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $411?

+23.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +25.6%

The market implies +23.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +25.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

TECH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $58?

+22.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.5%

The market implies +22.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AVGO
61/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TECH
63/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AVGO
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TECH
-3.03
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AVGO
Insiders 1.9%Institutions 79.9%Retail & Other 18.1%
No. of Institutional Holders6,094
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TECH
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 117.8%
No. of Institutional Holders815
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AVGO
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.55M
YOU HARRY L
Director
$325,129
@ $325.13 · 2025-12-18
YOU HARRY L
Director
$1.23M
@ $345.88 · 2025-09-10
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TECH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AVGO
4
Sells (3M)
29
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $241.47M
VELAGA S. RAM
Officer
$2.96M
@ $370.52 · 2026-04-10
VELAGA S. RAM
Officer
$10.64M
@ $352.08 · 2026-04-09
DELLY GAYLA J
Director
$358,310
@ $358.31 · 2026-04-09
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$712,354
@ $353.00 · 2026-04-08
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$19.45M
@ $323.38 · 2026-03-17
VELAGA S. RAM
Officer
$20.82M
@ $323.38 · 2026-03-17
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$27.06M
@ $323.39 · 2026-03-17
KAWWAS CHARLIE B
Officer
$20.97M
@ $323.39 · 2026-03-17
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$10.41M
@ $347.12 · 2026-01-06
TAN HOCK E
Chief Executive Officer
$24.31M
@ $347.30 · 2026-01-06
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$10.43M
@ $347.82 · 2025-12-31
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$9.13M
@ $352.07 · 2025-12-26
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.03M
@ $332.91 · 2025-12-17
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$12.54M
@ $327.65 · 2025-12-17
KAWWAS CHARLIE B
Officer
$1.05M
@ $332.95 · 2025-12-17
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$8.36M
@ $340.91 · 2025-12-16
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$289,512
@ $361.89 · 2025-12-15
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$264,912
@ $331.14 · 2025-11-14
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$280,120
@ $350.15 · 2025-10-14
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$9.59M
@ $352.61 · 2025-09-17
KAWWAS CHARLIE B
Officer
$2.26M
@ $352.74 · 2025-09-17
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$288,000
@ $360.00 · 2025-09-15
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$245,968
@ $307.46 · 2025-08-14
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$219,440
@ $274.30 · 2025-07-14
TAN HOCK E
Chief Executive Officer
$10.73M
@ $268.29 · 2025-06-26
DELLY GAYLA J
Director
$795,390
@ $265.13 · 2025-06-26
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$9.50M
@ $261.27 · 2025-06-24
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$13.11M
@ $262.10 · 2025-06-24
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$12.66M
@ $253.28 · 2025-06-23
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$14.18M
@ $251.75 · 2025-06-18
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$200,280
@ $250.35 · 2025-06-16
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$184,152
@ $230.19 · 2025-05-14
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$148,000
@ $185.00 · 2025-04-14
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$5.84M
@ $194.65 · 2025-03-24
LOW CHECK KIAN
Director
$11.30M
@ $235.35 · 2025-01-06
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$4.82M
@ $238.79 · 2024-12-24
TAN HOCK E
Chief Executive Officer
$10.80M
@ $239.96 · 2024-12-24
BRYANT DIANE M
Director
$3.40M
@ $226.68 · 2024-12-23
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.89M
@ $229.62 · 2024-12-20
YOU HARRY L
Director
$1.57M
@ $240.00 · 2024-12-17
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$3.43M
@ $181.45 · 2024-10-11
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$3.46M
@ $182.88 · 2024-10-09
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$3.59M
@ $177.10 · 2024-10-07
DELLY GAYLA J
Director
$130,898
@ $174.53 · 2024-09-25
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$444,566
@ $1750.26 · 2024-06-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TECH
0
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.92M
BAUMGARTNER ROBERT V
Director
$957,818
@ $56.21 · 2025-08-25
NUSSE ROELAND
Director
$960,388
@ $56.36 · 2025-08-25
KELDERMAN KIM
Chief Executive Officer
$1.04M
@ $77.29 · 2025-01-27
BAUMGARTNER ROBERT V
Director
$1.15M
@ $72.10 · 2024-08-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AVGO
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TECH
FearGreed
😐Neutral(46/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AVGO
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
TECH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (46)
View AVGO Full AnalysisView TECH Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AVGO vs TECH

Is Broadcom Inc. or Bio-Techne Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, AVGO trades at a -59.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $258 vs. price $411), compared to TECH's -195.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $20 vs. $58).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Broadcom Inc. or Bio-Techne Corporation?

TECH scores 63/100 (Narrow moat), while AVGO scores 61/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Broadcom Inc. or Bio-Techne Corporation?

Bio-Techne Corporation (TECH) generates a 3.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Broadcom Inc.'s 1.4%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Broadcom Inc. or Bio-Techne Corporation?

AVGO earns 19.1% ROIC versus TECH's 10.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Broadcom Inc.'s or Bio-Techne Corporation's?

AVGO's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to TECH's 78/100 (Safe). AVGO has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.