Compare StocksAVGO vs T

Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) vs AT&T Inc. (T): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, AVGO is overvalued at $411, with a DCF intrinsic value of $258 and a margin of safety of -59%. T is undervalued at $22, with an intrinsic value of $57 and a margin of safety of 62%. Of the two, T has the wider margin of safety.

AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
$411.35
VS
T
AT&T Inc.
$22.01

Rewards

AVGO
  • Gross margin of 76.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 18.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $11.66 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
T
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 16.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $14.89 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • FCF yield of 12.7% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.

Risks

AVGO
  • ROIC has declined by 6.5 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Share count has increased by 13% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • FCF yield of 1.4% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
T
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.89 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AVGO
T
Valuation
$27.21B
Free Cash Flow
$19.44B
1.39%
FCF Yield
12.71%
68.22
Trailing P/E
7.24
21.26
Forward P/E
8.64
Quality & Moat
19.14%
ROIC
7.90%
37.28%
ROE
18.37%
76.28%
Gross Margin
59.41%
0.68
PEG Ratio
1.62
Balance Sheet Safety
0.52
Net Debt / Equity
1.16
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.08
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.33
0.69%
Dividend Yield
4.95%
AVGO: 7Ties: 1T: 4
AVGOT

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AVGO

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

T

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AVGO
$97.03
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$14.50B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.41T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
T
$1.91
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$22.78B
Δ Market Cap
+$43.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AVGO
16.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 16.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $411.35
Fair Value: $489.83
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
T
61.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 61.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $22.01
Fair Value: $57.31
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AVGO

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $411?

+23.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +25.6%

The market implies +23.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +25.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

T

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $22?

+2.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.2%

The market implies +2.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +4.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AVGO
61/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
T
57/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AVGO
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
T
-2.78
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AVGO
Insiders 1.9%Institutions 79.9%Retail & Other 18.1%
No. of Institutional Holders6,094
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
T
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.3%Retail & Other 30.6%
No. of Institutional Holders3,701
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AVGO
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.55M
YOU HARRY L
Director
$325,129
@ $325.13 · 2025-12-18
YOU HARRY L
Director
$1.23M
@ $345.88 · 2025-09-10
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
T
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AVGO
4
Sells (3M)
29
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $241.47M
VELAGA S. RAM
Officer
$2.96M
@ $370.52 · 2026-04-10
VELAGA S. RAM
Officer
$10.64M
@ $352.08 · 2026-04-09
DELLY GAYLA J
Director
$358,310
@ $358.31 · 2026-04-09
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$712,354
@ $353.00 · 2026-04-08
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$19.45M
@ $323.38 · 2026-03-17
VELAGA S. RAM
Officer
$20.82M
@ $323.38 · 2026-03-17
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$27.06M
@ $323.39 · 2026-03-17
KAWWAS CHARLIE B
Officer
$20.97M
@ $323.39 · 2026-03-17
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$10.41M
@ $347.12 · 2026-01-06
TAN HOCK E
Chief Executive Officer
$24.31M
@ $347.30 · 2026-01-06
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$10.43M
@ $347.82 · 2025-12-31
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$9.13M
@ $352.07 · 2025-12-26
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.03M
@ $332.91 · 2025-12-17
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$12.54M
@ $327.65 · 2025-12-17
KAWWAS CHARLIE B
Officer
$1.05M
@ $332.95 · 2025-12-17
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$8.36M
@ $340.91 · 2025-12-16
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$289,512
@ $361.89 · 2025-12-15
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$264,912
@ $331.14 · 2025-11-14
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$280,120
@ $350.15 · 2025-10-14
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$9.59M
@ $352.61 · 2025-09-17
KAWWAS CHARLIE B
Officer
$2.26M
@ $352.74 · 2025-09-17
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$288,000
@ $360.00 · 2025-09-15
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$245,968
@ $307.46 · 2025-08-14
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$219,440
@ $274.30 · 2025-07-14
TAN HOCK E
Chief Executive Officer
$10.73M
@ $268.29 · 2025-06-26
DELLY GAYLA J
Director
$795,390
@ $265.13 · 2025-06-26
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$9.50M
@ $261.27 · 2025-06-24
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$13.11M
@ $262.10 · 2025-06-24
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$12.66M
@ $253.28 · 2025-06-23
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$14.18M
@ $251.75 · 2025-06-18
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$200,280
@ $250.35 · 2025-06-16
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$184,152
@ $230.19 · 2025-05-14
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$148,000
@ $185.00 · 2025-04-14
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$5.84M
@ $194.65 · 2025-03-24
LOW CHECK KIAN
Director
$11.30M
@ $235.35 · 2025-01-06
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$4.82M
@ $238.79 · 2024-12-24
TAN HOCK E
Chief Executive Officer
$10.80M
@ $239.96 · 2024-12-24
BRYANT DIANE M
Director
$3.40M
@ $226.68 · 2024-12-23
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.89M
@ $229.62 · 2024-12-20
YOU HARRY L
Director
$1.57M
@ $240.00 · 2024-12-17
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$3.43M
@ $181.45 · 2024-10-11
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$3.46M
@ $182.88 · 2024-10-09
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$3.59M
@ $177.10 · 2024-10-07
DELLY GAYLA J
Director
$130,898
@ $174.53 · 2024-09-25
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$444,566
@ $1750.26 · 2024-06-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
T
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
SABRINA SANDERS S
Officer
$41,348
@ $27.57 · 2025-05-28
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AVGO
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
T
FearGreed
😨Fear(34/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AVGO
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
T
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (34)
View AVGO Full AnalysisView T Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AVGO vs T

Is Broadcom Inc. or AT&T Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, T trades at a 61.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $57 vs. price $22), compared to AVGO's -59.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $258 vs. $411).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Broadcom Inc. or AT&T Inc.?

AVGO scores 61/100 (Narrow moat), while T scores 57/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is AT&T Inc. in financial distress?

T's Altman Z-Score of 0.9 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. AVGO scores 12.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Broadcom Inc. or AT&T Inc.?

AT&T Inc. (T) generates a 12.7% free cash flow yield, compared to Broadcom Inc.'s 1.4%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Broadcom Inc. or AT&T Inc.?

AVGO earns 19.1% ROIC versus T's 7.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Broadcom Inc.'s or AT&T Inc.'s?

AVGO's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to T's 91/100 (Very Safe). AVGO has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.