Compare StocksAVGO vs Q

Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) vs Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, AVGO is overvalued at $340, with a DCF intrinsic value of $259 and a margin of safety of -31%. Q is fairly valued at $115, with an intrinsic value of $132 and a margin of safety of 13%. Of the two, Q has the wider margin of safety.

AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
$339.51
VS
Q
Qnity Electronics, Inc.
$114.86

Rewards

AVGO
  • Gross margin of 75.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 18.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $11.66 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
Q

    Risks

    AVGO
    • ROIC has declined by 6.5 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Share count has increased by 13% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • FCF yield of 1.9% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    Q

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      AVGO
      Q
      Valuation
      $30.60B
      Free Cash Flow
      $772.25M
      1.89%
      FCF Yield
      3.21%
      43.30
      Trailing P/E
      41.02
      17.52
      Forward P/E
      21.36
      Quality & Moat
      24.03%
      ROIC
      7.61%
      44.25%
      ROE
      6.72%
      75.52%
      Gross Margin
      46.22%
      0.34
      PEG Ratio
      1.24
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.36
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.47
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      0.68
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      2.34
      0.77%
      Dividend Yield
      0.28%
      AVGO: 9Ties: 1Q: 2
      AVGOQ

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      AVGO

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Q

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      AVGO
      $97.03
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Exceptional Value Creator
      Σ Retained
      $14.50B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$1.41T
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      Q
      Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      AVGO
      30.7% Margin of Safety
      Price is 30.7% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $339.51
      Fair Value: $490.24
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      Q
      6.5% Margin of Safety
      Price is 6.5% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $114.86
      Fair Value: $122.85
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      AVGO

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $340?

      +21.0%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +21.3%

      The market implies +21.0% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

      Standard FCF implies +21.3%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

      Q

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $115?

      +15.4%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +15.6%

      The market implies +15.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      AVGO
      61/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      Q
      47/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      AVGO
      -2.09
      Possible Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      Q
      -2.57
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      AVGO
      Insiders 1.9%Institutions 79.8%Retail & Other 18.2%
      No. of Institutional Holders6,310
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      Q
      Insiders 0.1%Institutions 78.8%Retail & Other 21.2%
      No. of Institutional Holders1,676
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      AVGO
      0
      Buys (3M)
      2
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $698,699
      YOU HARRY L
      Director
      $373,570
      @ $373.57 · 2026-06-11
      YOU HARRY L
      Director
      $325,129
      @ $325.13 · 2025-12-18
      YOU HARRY L
      Director
      $1.23M
      @ $345.88 · 2025-09-10
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      Q
      1
      Buys (3M)
      3
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $467,708
      DE BONDT KARIN
      Director
      $138,136
      @ $138.14 · 2026-08-11
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $250,452
      @ $77.30 · 2025-11-21
      GREEN BYRON
      Director
      $79,120
      @ $79.12 · 2025-11-19
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      AVGO
      5
      Sells (3M)
      25
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $215.77M
      BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
      Officer
      $10.03M
      @ $401.33 · 2026-07-10
      DELLY GAYLA J
      Director
      $728,368
      @ $385.38 · 2026-07-08
      BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
      Officer
      $9.48M
      @ $379.19 · 2026-07-08
      PAGE JUSTINE F.
      Director
      $598,916
      @ $373.86 · 2026-06-29
      BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
      Officer
      $9.68M
      @ $387.00 · 2026-06-25
      BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
      Officer
      $3.18M
      @ $389.59 · 2026-06-17
      VELAGA S. RAM
      Officer
      $2.96M
      @ $370.52 · 2026-04-10
      DELLY GAYLA J
      Director
      $358,310
      @ $358.31 · 2026-04-09
      VELAGA S. RAM
      Officer
      $10.64M
      @ $352.08 · 2026-04-09
      PAGE JUSTINE F.
      Director
      $712,354
      @ $353.00 · 2026-04-08
      KAWWAS CHARLIE B
      Officer
      $20.97M
      @ $323.39 · 2026-03-17
      BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
      Officer
      $27.06M
      @ $323.39 · 2026-03-17
      VELAGA S. RAM
      Officer
      $20.82M
      @ $323.38 · 2026-03-17
      SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
      Chief Financial Officer
      $19.45M
      @ $323.38 · 2026-03-17
      TAN HOCK E
      Chief Executive Officer
      $24.31M
      @ $347.30 · 2026-01-06
      BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
      Officer
      $10.41M
      @ $347.12 · 2026-01-06
      SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
      Chief Financial Officer
      $10.43M
      @ $347.82 · 2025-12-31
      BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
      Officer
      $9.13M
      @ $352.07 · 2025-12-26
      KAWWAS CHARLIE B
      Officer
      $1.05M
      @ $332.95 · 2025-12-17
      BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
      Officer
      $12.54M
      @ $327.65 · 2025-12-17
      SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
      Chief Financial Officer
      $2.03M
      @ $332.91 · 2025-12-17
      BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
      Officer
      $8.36M
      @ $340.91 · 2025-12-16
      PAGE JUSTINE F.
      Director
      $289,512
      @ $361.89 · 2025-12-15
      PAGE JUSTINE F.
      Director
      $264,912
      @ $331.14 · 2025-11-14
      PAGE JUSTINE F.
      Director
      $280,120
      @ $350.15 · 2025-10-14
      KAWWAS CHARLIE B
      Officer
      $2.26M
      @ $352.74 · 2025-09-17
      BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
      Officer
      $9.59M
      @ $352.61 · 2025-09-17
      PAGE JUSTINE F.
      Director
      $288,000
      @ $360.00 · 2025-09-15
      PAGE JUSTINE F.
      Director
      $245,968
      @ $307.46 · 2025-08-14
      PAGE JUSTINE F.
      Director
      $219,440
      @ $274.30 · 2025-07-14
      TAN HOCK E
      Chief Executive Officer
      $10.73M
      @ $268.29 · 2025-06-26
      DELLY GAYLA J
      Director
      $795,390
      @ $265.13 · 2025-06-26
      BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
      Officer
      $13.11M
      @ $262.10 · 2025-06-24
      SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
      Chief Financial Officer
      $9.50M
      @ $261.27 · 2025-06-24
      BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
      Officer
      $12.66M
      @ $253.28 · 2025-06-23
      SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
      Chief Financial Officer
      $14.18M
      @ $251.75 · 2025-06-18
      PAGE JUSTINE F.
      Director
      $200,280
      @ $250.35 · 2025-06-16
      PAGE JUSTINE F.
      Director
      $184,152
      @ $230.19 · 2025-05-14
      PAGE JUSTINE F.
      Director
      $148,000
      @ $185.00 · 2025-04-14
      BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
      Officer
      $5.84M
      @ $194.65 · 2025-03-24
      LOW CHECK KIAN
      Director
      $11.30M
      @ $235.35 · 2025-01-06
      TAN HOCK E
      Chief Executive Officer
      $10.80M
      @ $239.96 · 2024-12-24
      BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
      Officer
      $4.82M
      @ $238.79 · 2024-12-24
      BRYANT DIANE M
      Director
      $3.40M
      @ $226.68 · 2024-12-23
      SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
      Chief Financial Officer
      $2.89M
      @ $229.62 · 2024-12-20
      YOU HARRY L
      Director
      $1.57M
      @ $240.00 · 2024-12-17
      BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
      Officer
      $3.43M
      @ $181.45 · 2024-10-11
      BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
      Officer
      $3.46M
      @ $182.88 · 2024-10-09
      BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
      Officer
      $3.59M
      @ $177.10 · 2024-10-07
      DELLY GAYLA J
      Director
      $130,898
      @ $174.53 · 2024-09-25
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      Q
      0
      Sells (3M)
      6
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $970,297
      STERIN STEVEN M
      Director
      $59,340
      @ $148.35 · 2026-06-05
      STERIN STEVEN M
      Director
      $82,764
      @ $161.96 · 2026-05-26
      GOSS MICHAEL G.
      Officer
      $160,677
      @ $84.79 · 2025-12-11
      KEMP JON D
      Chief Executive Officer
      $480,732
      @ $85.01 · 2025-12-11
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $534.00
      @ $76.29 · 2025-11-21
      KANG SANG HO
      Officer
      $186,250
      @ $74.50 · 2025-11-21
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      AVGO
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(39/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      Q
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(36/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      AVGO
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
      Q
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (36)
      View AVGO Full AnalysisView Q Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: AVGO vs Q

      Is Broadcom Inc. or Qnity Electronics, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, Q trades at a 13.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $132 vs. price $115), compared to AVGO's -31.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $259 vs. $340).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Broadcom Inc. or Qnity Electronics, Inc.?

      AVGO scores 61/100 (Narrow moat), while Q scores 47/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Qnity Electronics, Inc. in financial distress?

      Q's Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. AVGO scores 12.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which company has better free cash flow, Broadcom Inc. or Qnity Electronics, Inc.?

      Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q) generates a 3.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Broadcom Inc.'s 1.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Broadcom Inc. or Qnity Electronics, Inc.?

      AVGO earns 24.0% ROIC versus Q's 7.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      Which dividend is safer, Broadcom Inc.'s or Qnity Electronics, Inc.'s?

      AVGO's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to Q's 85/100 (Very Safe). AVGO has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

      AVGO vs Q: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io