Compare Stocks › AVGO vs CTVA

Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) vs Corteva, Inc. (CTVA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, AVGO is overvalued at $326, with a DCF intrinsic value of $259 and a margin of safety of -26%. CTVA is undervalued at $12, with an intrinsic value of $39 and a margin of safety of 70%. Of the two, CTVA has the wider margin of safety.

AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
$326.08
VS
CTVA
Corteva, Inc.
$11.64

Rewards

AVGO
  • ★Gross margin of 75.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 18.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $11.66 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
CTVA
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 119.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.62 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

AVGO
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 6.5 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 13% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 2.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
CTVA
  • ⚠Return on equity has remained below 5% over 4 years — shareholder capital is generating minimal returns.
  • ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 4.2x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.97 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AVGO
CTVA
Valuation
$30.60B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
1.97%
FCF Yield
N/A
41.64
Trailing P/E
7.19
16.75
Forward P/E
10.36
Quality & Moat
24.03%
ROIC
3.82%
44.25%
ROE
13.12%
75.52%
Gross Margin
33.21%
0.32
PEG Ratio
0.62
Balance Sheet Safety
0.36
Net Debt / Equity
0.34
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.68
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.23
0.80%
Dividend Yield
6.19%
AVGO: 5Ties: 2CTVA: 3
AVGOCTVA

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AVGO

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

CTVA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AVGO
$97.03
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$14.50B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.41T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
CTVA
$0.34
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$1.36B
Δ Market Cap
+$468.2M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AVGO
33.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 33.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $326.08
Fair Value: $490.24
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
CTVA
72.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 72.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $11.64
Fair Value: $41.51
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AVGO

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $326?

+20.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +20.8%

The market implies +20.4% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +20.8%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

CTVA

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AVGO
61/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
CTVA
52/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AVGO
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
CTVA
-2.69
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AVGO
Insiders 1.9%Institutions 79.9%Retail & Other 18.2%
No. of Institutional Holders6,273
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
CTVA
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 92.8%Retail & Other 7.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,924
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AVGO
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $698,699
YOU HARRY L
Director
$373,570
@ $373.57 · 2026-06-11
YOU HARRY L
Director
$325,129
@ $325.13 · 2025-12-18
YOU HARRY L
Director
$1.23M
@ $345.88 · 2025-09-10
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
CTVA
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AVGO
0
Sells (3M)
24
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $215.49M
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$10.03M
@ $401.33 · 2026-07-10
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$9.48M
@ $379.19 · 2026-07-08
DELLY GAYLA J
Director
$728,368
@ $385.38 · 2026-07-08
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$598,916
@ $373.86 · 2026-06-29
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$9.68M
@ $387.00 · 2026-06-25
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$3.18M
@ $389.59 · 2026-06-17
VELAGA S. RAM
Officer
$2.96M
@ $370.52 · 2026-04-10
VELAGA S. RAM
Officer
$10.64M
@ $352.08 · 2026-04-09
DELLY GAYLA J
Director
$358,310
@ $358.31 · 2026-04-09
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$712,354
@ $353.00 · 2026-04-08
VELAGA S. RAM
Officer
$20.82M
@ $323.38 · 2026-03-17
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$27.06M
@ $323.39 · 2026-03-17
KAWWAS CHARLIE B
Officer
$20.97M
@ $323.39 · 2026-03-17
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$19.45M
@ $323.38 · 2026-03-17
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$10.41M
@ $347.12 · 2026-01-06
TAN HOCK E
Chief Executive Officer
$24.31M
@ $347.30 · 2026-01-06
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$10.43M
@ $347.82 · 2025-12-31
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$9.13M
@ $352.07 · 2025-12-26
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$12.54M
@ $327.65 · 2025-12-17
KAWWAS CHARLIE B
Officer
$1.05M
@ $332.95 · 2025-12-17
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.03M
@ $332.91 · 2025-12-17
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$8.36M
@ $340.91 · 2025-12-16
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$289,512
@ $361.89 · 2025-12-15
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$264,912
@ $331.14 · 2025-11-14
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$280,120
@ $350.15 · 2025-10-14
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$9.59M
@ $352.61 · 2025-09-17
KAWWAS CHARLIE B
Officer
$2.26M
@ $352.74 · 2025-09-17
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$288,000
@ $360.00 · 2025-09-15
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$245,968
@ $307.46 · 2025-08-14
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$219,440
@ $274.30 · 2025-07-14
TAN HOCK E
Chief Executive Officer
$10.73M
@ $268.29 · 2025-06-26
DELLY GAYLA J
Director
$795,390
@ $265.13 · 2025-06-26
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$13.11M
@ $262.10 · 2025-06-24
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$9.50M
@ $261.27 · 2025-06-24
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$12.66M
@ $253.28 · 2025-06-23
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$14.18M
@ $251.75 · 2025-06-18
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$200,280
@ $250.35 · 2025-06-16
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$184,152
@ $230.19 · 2025-05-14
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$148,000
@ $185.00 · 2025-04-14
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$5.84M
@ $194.65 · 2025-03-24
LOW CHECK KIAN
Director
$11.30M
@ $235.35 · 2025-01-06
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$4.82M
@ $238.79 · 2024-12-24
TAN HOCK E
Chief Executive Officer
$10.80M
@ $239.96 · 2024-12-24
BRYANT DIANE M
Director
$3.40M
@ $226.68 · 2024-12-23
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.89M
@ $229.62 · 2024-12-20
YOU HARRY L
Director
$1.57M
@ $240.00 · 2024-12-17
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
CTVA
0
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $636,200
TITUS BRIAN
Officer
$636,200
@ $76.55 · 2026-02-20
KING ROBERT D
Officer
$2.77M
@ $74.20 · 2025-08-29
FUERER CORNEL B
Officer
$3.76M
@ $68.06 · 2025-05-13
TITUS BRIAN
Officer
$1.69M
@ $63.74 · 2025-02-20
MAGRO CHARLES V.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.99M
@ $63.82 · 2025-02-19
FUERER CORNEL B
General Counsel
$2.39M
@ $63.40 · 2024-11-26
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AVGO
FearGreed
😨Fear(35/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
CTVA
FearGreed
😨Fear(37/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AVGO
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (35)
CTVA
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
View AVGO Full AnalysisView CTVA Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AVGO vs CTVA

Is Broadcom Inc. or Corteva, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, CTVA trades at a 70.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $39 vs. price $12), compared to AVGO's -25.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $259 vs. $326).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Broadcom Inc. or Corteva, Inc.?▼

AVGO scores 61/100 (Narrow moat), while CTVA scores 52/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Corteva, Inc. in financial distress?▼

CTVA's Altman Z-Score of 1.0 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. AVGO scores 12.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Broadcom Inc. or Corteva, Inc.?▼

AVGO earns 24.0% ROIC versus CTVA's 3.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Broadcom Inc.'s or Corteva, Inc.'s?▼

CTVA's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to AVGO's 94/100 (Very Safe). CTVA has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

AVGO vs CTVA: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io