Compare Stocks › AVGO vs CSX

Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) vs CSX Corporation (CSX): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, AVGO is overvalued at $326, with a DCF intrinsic value of $259 and a margin of safety of -26%. CSX is overvalued at $52, with an intrinsic value of $38 and a margin of safety of -36%. Of the two, AVGO has the wider margin of safety.

AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
$326.08
VS
CSX
CSX Corporation
$51.99

Rewards

AVGO
  • ★Gross margin of 75.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 18.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $11.66 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
CSX
  • ★CSX Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

AVGO
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 6.5 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 13% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 2.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
CSX
  • ⚠FCF yield of 2.5% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 27.1x is 45% above the historical average of 18.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • ⚠Free cash flow has declined at a 20.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AVGO
CSX
Valuation
$30.60B
Free Cash Flow
$2.42B
1.97%
FCF Yield
2.51%
41.64
Trailing P/E
27.08
16.75
Forward P/E
22.22
Quality & Moat
24.03%
ROIC
13.70%
44.25%
ROE
26.39%
75.52%
Gross Margin
47.78%
0.32
PEG Ratio
1.85
Balance Sheet Safety
0.36
Net Debt / Equity
1.24
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.68
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.50
0.80%
Dividend Yield
1.08%
AVGO: 8Ties: 1CSX: 3
AVGOCSX

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AVGO

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

CSX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AVGO
$97.03
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$14.50B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.41T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
CSX
$0.47
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$7.24B
Δ Market Cap
+$3.41B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AVGO
33.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 33.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $326.08
Fair Value: $490.24
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
CSX
36.5% Overvalued
Price is 36.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $51.99
Fair Value: $38.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AVGO

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $326?

+20.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +20.8%

The market implies +20.4% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +20.8%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

CSX

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $52?

+17.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +19.4%

The market implies +17.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +19.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AVGO
61/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
CSX
69/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AVGO
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
CSX
-2.69
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AVGO
Insiders 1.9%Institutions 79.9%Retail & Other 18.2%
No. of Institutional Holders6,273
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
CSX
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 81.8%Retail & Other 18.0%
No. of Institutional Holders2,550
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AVGO
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $698,699
YOU HARRY L
Director
$373,570
@ $373.57 · 2026-06-11
YOU HARRY L
Director
$325,129
@ $325.13 · 2025-12-18
YOU HARRY L
Director
$1.23M
@ $345.88 · 2025-09-10
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
CSX
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.01M
ANGEL STEPHEN F
Chief Executive Officer
$1.01M
@ $40.27 · 2026-03-06
ANGEL STEPHEN F
Chief Executive Officer
$2.03M
@ $36.87 · 2025-10-20
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AVGO
0
Sells (3M)
24
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $215.49M
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$10.03M
@ $401.33 · 2026-07-10
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$9.48M
@ $379.19 · 2026-07-08
DELLY GAYLA J
Director
$728,368
@ $385.38 · 2026-07-08
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$598,916
@ $373.86 · 2026-06-29
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$9.68M
@ $387.00 · 2026-06-25
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$3.18M
@ $389.59 · 2026-06-17
VELAGA S. RAM
Officer
$2.96M
@ $370.52 · 2026-04-10
VELAGA S. RAM
Officer
$10.64M
@ $352.08 · 2026-04-09
DELLY GAYLA J
Director
$358,310
@ $358.31 · 2026-04-09
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$712,354
@ $353.00 · 2026-04-08
VELAGA S. RAM
Officer
$20.82M
@ $323.38 · 2026-03-17
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$27.06M
@ $323.39 · 2026-03-17
KAWWAS CHARLIE B
Officer
$20.97M
@ $323.39 · 2026-03-17
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$19.45M
@ $323.38 · 2026-03-17
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$10.41M
@ $347.12 · 2026-01-06
TAN HOCK E
Chief Executive Officer
$24.31M
@ $347.30 · 2026-01-06
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$10.43M
@ $347.82 · 2025-12-31
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$9.13M
@ $352.07 · 2025-12-26
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$12.54M
@ $327.65 · 2025-12-17
KAWWAS CHARLIE B
Officer
$1.05M
@ $332.95 · 2025-12-17
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.03M
@ $332.91 · 2025-12-17
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$8.36M
@ $340.91 · 2025-12-16
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$289,512
@ $361.89 · 2025-12-15
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$264,912
@ $331.14 · 2025-11-14
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$280,120
@ $350.15 · 2025-10-14
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$9.59M
@ $352.61 · 2025-09-17
KAWWAS CHARLIE B
Officer
$2.26M
@ $352.74 · 2025-09-17
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$288,000
@ $360.00 · 2025-09-15
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$245,968
@ $307.46 · 2025-08-14
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$219,440
@ $274.30 · 2025-07-14
TAN HOCK E
Chief Executive Officer
$10.73M
@ $268.29 · 2025-06-26
DELLY GAYLA J
Director
$795,390
@ $265.13 · 2025-06-26
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$13.11M
@ $262.10 · 2025-06-24
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$9.50M
@ $261.27 · 2025-06-24
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$12.66M
@ $253.28 · 2025-06-23
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$14.18M
@ $251.75 · 2025-06-18
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$200,280
@ $250.35 · 2025-06-16
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$184,152
@ $230.19 · 2025-05-14
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$148,000
@ $185.00 · 2025-04-14
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$5.84M
@ $194.65 · 2025-03-24
LOW CHECK KIAN
Director
$11.30M
@ $235.35 · 2025-01-06
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$4.82M
@ $238.79 · 2024-12-24
TAN HOCK E
Chief Executive Officer
$10.80M
@ $239.96 · 2024-12-24
BRYANT DIANE M
Director
$3.40M
@ $226.68 · 2024-12-23
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.89M
@ $229.62 · 2024-12-20
YOU HARRY L
Director
$1.57M
@ $240.00 · 2024-12-17
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
CSX
1
Sells (3M)
8
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $17.59M
ZILLMER JOHN J
Director
$999,180
@ $51.24 · 2026-10-26
BURNS MICHAEL S.
Officer
$684,840
@ $52.68 · 2026-07-24
WILLIAMS ANGELA C
Officer
$1.60M
@ $53.29 · 2026-07-24
BOONE KEVIN S
Chief Financial Officer
$6.38M
@ $46.70 · 2026-06-03
ZILLMER JOHN J
Director
$464,500
@ $46.45 · 2026-06-03
SORFLEET DIANA B
Officer
$3.74M
@ $41.56 · 2026-02-19
FORTUNE STEPHEN
Chief Technology Officer
$1.22M
@ $38.65 · 2026-02-03
SORFLEET DIANA B
Officer
$2.50M
@ $37.48 · 2026-01-28
BOONE KEVIN S
Officer
$1.12M
@ $36.09 · 2025-10-22
BURNS MICHAEL S.
Officer
$891,393
@ $36.76 · 2025-10-20
FORTUNE STEPHEN
Officer
$47,115
@ $31.41 · 2025-03-04
GOLDMAN NATHAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$4.20M
@ $35.39 · 2024-11-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AVGO
FearGreed
😨Fear(35/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
CSX
FearGreed
😏Greed(71/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AVGO
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (35)
CSX
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (71)
View AVGO Full AnalysisView CSX Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AVGO vs CSX

Is Broadcom Inc. or CSX Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, AVGO trades at a -25.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $259 vs. price $326), compared to CSX's -36.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $38 vs. $52).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Broadcom Inc. or CSX Corporation?▼

CSX scores 69/100 (Narrow moat), while AVGO scores 61/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is CSX Corporation in financial distress?▼

CSX's Altman Z-Score of 2.3 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. AVGO scores 12.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Broadcom Inc. or CSX Corporation?▼

CSX Corporation (CSX) generates a 2.5% free cash flow yield, compared to Broadcom Inc.'s 2.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Broadcom Inc. or CSX Corporation?▼

AVGO earns 24.0% ROIC versus CSX's 13.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Broadcom Inc.'s or CSX Corporation's?▼

CSX's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to AVGO's 94/100 (Very Safe). CSX has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.