Compare Stocks › ARES vs GOOGL

Ares Management Corporation (ARES) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, ARES is overvalued at $128, with a DCF intrinsic value of $72 and a margin of safety of -77%. GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. Of the two, ARES has the wider margin of safety.

ARES
Ares Management Corporation
$128.15
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84

Rewards

ARES
  • ★Gross margin of 100.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Trailing P/E of 59.1x is 23% below the historical average of 77.2x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.95 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

ARES
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 25% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • ⚠High leverage (1.51x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 1.36 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
GOOGL

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ARES
    GOOGL
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $-1.16B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    -0.03%
    59.06
    Trailing P/E
    14.61
    18.31
    Forward P/E
    18.49
    Quality & Moat
    0.48%
    ROIC
    14.30%
    12.88%
    ROE
    44.29%
    100.00%
    Gross Margin
    60.86%
    0.95
    PEG Ratio
    0.98
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.51
    Net Debt / Equity
    Net cash
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -0.62
    4.21%
    Dividend Yield
    0.31%
    ARES: 2Ties: 3GOOGL: 4
    ARESGOOGL

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ARES

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ARES
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-2.63B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$23.73B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ARES
    77.0% Overvalued
    Price is 77.0% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $128.15
    Fair Value: $72.40
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    GOOGL
    3447.8% Overvalued
    Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $279.84
    Fair Value: $7.89
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ARES

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    GOOGL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ARES
    47/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ARES
    -2.63
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ARES
    Insiders 11.2%Institutions 94.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,147
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,451
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ARES
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.33M
    OLIAN JUDY D.
    Director
    $59,726
    @ $124.43 · 2026-02-20
    BHUTANI ASHISH
    Director
    $1.27M
    @ $126.61 · 2026-02-06
    BHUTANI ASHISH
    Director
    $1.41M
    @ $141.33 · 2025-03-11
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ARES
    0
    Sells (3M)
    2
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $828,271
    SAGATI AGHILI NASEEM
    General Counsel
    $529,032
    @ $134.92 · 2026-02-04
    SAGATI AGHILI NASEEM
    General Counsel
    $299,239
    @ $161.84 · 2026-01-22
    SAGATI AGHILI NASEEM
    General Counsel
    $3.28M
    @ $155.97 · 2025-10-01
    SAGATI AGHILI NASEEM
    General Counsel
    $3.75M
    @ $178.40 · 2025-09-10
    AROUGHETI MICHAEL J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $16.98M
    @ $153.17 · 2025-03-24
    DEVEER ROBERT KIPP III
    President
    $15.00M
    @ $190.02 · 2025-02-06
    BERRY RYAN
    Officer
    $2.62M
    @ $180.16 · 2024-12-11
    DEVEER ROBERT KIPP III
    Officer and Director
    $53.15M
    @ $177.16 · 2024-12-10
    BERRY RYAN
    Officer
    $980,502
    @ $180.14 · 2024-12-09
    BERRY RYAN
    Officer
    $292,425
    @ $175.00 · 2024-11-11
    BERRY RYAN
    Officer
    $3.21M
    @ $175.18 · 2024-11-06
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ARES
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(40/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(23/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ARES
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (40)
    GOOGL
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
    View ARES Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: ARES vs GOOGL

    Is Ares Management Corporation or Alphabet Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, ARES trades at a -77.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $72 vs. price $128), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Ares Management Corporation or Alphabet Inc.?▼

    GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while ARES scores 47/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Ares Management Corporation in financial distress?▼

    ARES's Altman Z-Score of 1.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GOOGL scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Ares Management Corporation or Alphabet Inc.?▼

    GOOGL earns 14.3% ROIC versus ARES's 0.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Ares Management Corporation's or Alphabet Inc.'s?▼

    GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to ARES's 54/100 (Borderline). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

    ARES vs GOOGL: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io