Compare Stocks › ARE vs ORCL

Alexandria Real Estate Equities (ARE) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, ARE is undervalued at $51, with a DCF intrinsic value of $9106274826 and a margin of safety of 100%. ORCL is undervalued at $130, with an intrinsic value of $404 and a margin of safety of 68%. Of the two, ARE has the wider margin of safety.

ARE

Alexandria Real Estate Equities

$51.45

ORCL

Oracle Corporation

$129.87

Rewards

ARE

★Gross margin of 68.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.

ORCL

★Gross margin of 65.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.80 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

ARE

⚠PEG ratio of 3.24 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 6.7x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.10 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

ORCL

⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
⚠High leverage (3.15x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 4.4x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →

ARE

ORCL

Valuation

$1.41B

Free Cash Flow

$-24.54B

N/A

FCF Yield

-6.56%

N/A

Trailing P/E

22.28

-58.47

Forward P/E

11.93

Quality & Moat

1.14%

ROIC

9.15%

-4.14%

ROE

53.38%

68.59%

Gross Margin

65.82%

3.24

PEG Ratio

0.73

Balance Sheet Safety

0.64

Net Debt / Equity

3.15

N/A

Interest Coverage

N/A

6.70

Net Debt / EBITDA

4.44

5.60%

Dividend Yield

1.54%

ARE: 4Ties: 2ORCL: 4

AREORCL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →

ARE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

ORCL

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →

ARE

N/A

Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable

Company had negative cumulative retained earnings

Σ Retained

$-3.66B

Δ Market Cap

$-96.73

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

ORCL

$3.51

created per $1 retained over 3 years

Exceptional Value Creator

Σ Retained

$25.08B

Δ Market Cap

+$87.99B

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →

ARE

100.0% Margin of Safety

Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value

Current Price: $51.45

Strongly undervalued

Fairly valued

Strongly overvalued

Fair Value: $9106274826.16

Strongly undervalued

Undervalued

Fairly valued

Overvalued

Strongly overvalued

ORCL

67.8% Margin of Safety

Price is 67.8% below estimated fair value

Current Price: $129.87

Strongly undervalued

Fairly valued

Strongly overvalued

Fair Value: $403.51

Strongly undervalued

Undervalued

Fairly valued

Overvalued

Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →

ARE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $51?

-3.6%

Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market below historical growth — potential opportunity.

ORCL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →

ARE

50/100

Narrow Moat

70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

ORCL

67/100

Narrow Moat

70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →

ARE

-2.80

Unlikely Manipulator

Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

ORCL

-2.58

Unlikely Manipulator

Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →

ARE

Insiders 1.4%Institutions 97.0%Retail & Other 1.7%

No. of Institutional Holders869

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

ORCL

Insiders 40.5%Institutions 43.9%Retail & Other 15.6%

No. of Institutional Holders4,502

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →

ARE

Buys (3M)

Buys (12M)

Total value (12M): $2.71M

MARCUS JOEL S

Officer and Director

$347,558

@ $46.34 · 2026-05-06

MARCUS JOEL S

Officer and Director

$320,416

@ $42.72 · 2026-05-05

MARCUS JOEL S

Officer and Director

$410,200

@ $41.02 · 2026-05-04

THOMAS GREGORY CALVIN

Chief Technology Officer

$143,500

@ $41.00 · 2026-04-30

MARCUS JOEL S

Officer and Director

$1.35M

@ $53.92 · 2026-02-12

MCGRATH SHEILA K.

Director

$141,360

@ $45.60 · 2025-12-10

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

ORCL

Buys (3M)

Buys (12M)

FAIRHEAD RONA ALISON

Director

$112,258

@ $233.87 · 2025-07-07

MOORMAN CHARLES W IV

Director

$947,913

@ $172.35 · 2025-02-12

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →

ARE

Sells (3M)

Sells (12M)

Total value (12M): $546,506

BINDA MARC E.

Chief Financial Officer

$108,000

@ $54.00 · 2026-06-09

KUHN HALLIE E.

Officer

$25,835

@ $48.20 · 2026-04-17

GOSSETT BRET E.

Officer

$251,792

@ $53.55 · 2026-02-27

ALSBROOK MADELEINE THORP

Officer

$160,879

@ $46.15 · 2025-12-16

ALSBROOK MADELEINE THORP

Officer

$446,202

@ $102.34 · 2024-12-16

MOGLIA PETER M

Chief Executive Officer

$1.02M

@ $102.26 · 2024-12-16

RYAN DANIEL J

Officer

$1.03M

@ $103.31 · 2024-12-11

GAVINET ANDRES

Officer

$2.09M

@ $104.29 · 2024-12-11

KASS HUNTER

President

$530,650

@ $106.13 · 2024-12-09

CAIN JAMES P

Director

$42,456

@ $124.87 · 2024-09-16

CIRUZZI VINCENT R. JR

Officer

$855,756

@ $123.29 · 2024-09-13

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

ORCL

Sells (3M)

Sells (12M)

Total value (12M): $126.77M

HENLEY JEFFREY O

Officer and Director

$63.66M

@ $159.16 · 2026-06-24

LEVEY STUART A

Officer

$2.64M

@ $176.19 · 2026-04-16

MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M

Chief Executive Officer

$1.55M

@ $155.23 · 2026-02-09

KEHRING DOUGLAS A

Officer

$6.82M

@ $194.89 · 2026-01-15

HURA MARK

Officer

$2.95M

@ $196.89 · 2025-12-24

SELIGMAN NAOMI O

Director

$437,064

@ $196.61 · 2025-12-23

MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M

Chief Executive Officer

$1.93M

@ $192.52 · 2025-12-19

SMITH MARIA

Officer

$2.80M

@ $280.31 · 2025-10-23

MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M

Chief Executive Officer

$11.07M

@ $276.64 · 2025-10-21

LEVEY STUART A

Officer

$5.93M

@ $300.00 · 2025-10-10

SELIGMAN NAOMI O

Director

$641,958

@ $288.91 · 2025-09-26

SICILIA MICHAEL D

Officer

$10.87M

@ $321.16 · 2025-09-23

SICILIA MICHAEL D

Officer

$5.12M

@ $313.60 · 2025-09-16

MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M

President

$6.31M

@ $297.11 · 2025-09-12

SICILIA MICHAEL D

Officer

$4.04M

@ $254.48 · 2025-08-05

SELIGMAN NAOMI O

Director

$770,656

@ $233.32 · 2025-07-16

SMITH MARIA

Officer

$2.33M

@ $232.99 · 2025-07-03

CATZ SAFRA A

Chief Executive Officer

$267.24M

@ $212.01 · 2025-06-27

CATZ SAFRA A

Chief Executive Officer

$794.64M

@ $212.50 · 2025-06-26

CATZ SAFRA A

Chief Executive Officer

$764.01M

@ $206.77 · 2025-06-23

MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M

Officer

$3.21M

@ $214.10 · 2025-06-17

CONRADES GEORGE HENRY

Director

$1.74M

@ $213.49 · 2025-06-17

SELIGMAN NAOMI O

Director

$428,562

@ $149.53 · 2025-05-05

SELIGMAN NAOMI O

Director

$291,620

@ $145.81 · 2025-04-02

CATZ SAFRA A

Chief Executive Officer

$705.46M

@ $185.40 · 2025-01-24

SMITH MARIA

Officer

$1.04M

@ $165.00 · 2024-09-16

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →

ARE

😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

ORCL

😨Fear(33/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →

ARE

⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)

ORCL

⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)

View ARE Full Analysis View ORCL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ARE vs ORCL

Is Alexandria Real Estate Equities or Oracle Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ARE trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $9106274826 vs. price $51), compared to ORCL's 67.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $404 vs. $130).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alexandria Real Estate Equities or Oracle Corporation?▼

ORCL scores 67/100 (Narrow moat), while ARE scores 50/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Alexandria Real Estate Equities in financial distress?▼

ARE's Altman Z-Score of 0.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ORCL scores 1.6 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alexandria Real Estate Equities or Oracle Corporation?▼

ORCL earns 9.2% ROIC versus ARE's 1.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Alexandria Real Estate Equities's or Oracle Corporation's?▼

ORCL's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to ARE's 59/100 (Borderline). ORCL has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.