SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › ARE vs INTC

Alexandria Real Estate Equities (ARE) vs Intel Corporation (INTC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, ARE is undervalued at $51, with a DCF intrinsic value of $9106274826 and a margin of safety of 100%. INTC is overvalued at $90, with an intrinsic value of $7 and a margin of safety of -1271%. Of the two, ARE has the wider margin of safety.

ARE
Alexandria Real Estate Equities
$51.45
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$90.20

Rewards

ARE
  • ★Gross margin of 68.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
INTC

    Risks

    ARE
    • ⚠PEG ratio of 3.24 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 6.7x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.10 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    INTC
    • ⚠Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • ⚠Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • ⚠FCF yield of 1.1% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ARE
    INTC
    Valuation
    $1.41B
    Free Cash Flow
    $4.87B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    1.07%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    -58.47
    Forward P/E
    44.27
    Quality & Moat
    1.14%
    ROIC
    3.57%
    -4.14%
    ROE
    -10.71%
    68.59%
    Gross Margin
    38.87%
    3.24
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.64
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.20
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    6.70
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.24
    5.60%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    ARE: 4Ties: 1INTC: 5
    AREINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ARE

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ARE
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-3.66B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-96.73
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ARE
    100.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $51.45
    Fair Value: $9106274826.16
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $90.20
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ARE

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $51?

    -3.6%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market below historical growth — potential opportunity.

    INTC

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $90?

    +29.6%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ARE
    50/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ARE
    -2.80
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.83
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ARE
    Insiders 1.4%Institutions 97.0%Retail & Other 1.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders869
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 14.7%Institutions 63.9%Retail & Other 21.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,881
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ARE
    1
    Buys (3M)
    6
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.71M
    MARCUS JOEL S
    Officer and Director
    $347,558
    @ $46.34 · 2026-05-06
    MARCUS JOEL S
    Officer and Director
    $320,416
    @ $42.72 · 2026-05-05
    MARCUS JOEL S
    Officer and Director
    $410,200
    @ $41.02 · 2026-05-04
    THOMAS GREGORY CALVIN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $143,500
    @ $41.00 · 2026-04-30
    MARCUS JOEL S
    Officer and Director
    $1.35M
    @ $53.92 · 2026-02-12
    MCGRATH SHEILA K.
    Director
    $141,360
    @ $45.60 · 2025-12-10
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ARE
    1
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $546,506
    BINDA MARC E.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $108,000
    @ $54.00 · 2026-06-09
    KUHN HALLIE E.
    Officer
    $25,835
    @ $48.20 · 2026-04-17
    GOSSETT BRET E.
    Officer
    $251,792
    @ $53.55 · 2026-02-27
    ALSBROOK MADELEINE THORP
    Officer
    $160,879
    @ $46.15 · 2025-12-16
    ALSBROOK MADELEINE THORP
    Officer
    $446,202
    @ $102.34 · 2024-12-16
    MOGLIA PETER M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.02M
    @ $102.26 · 2024-12-16
    RYAN DANIEL J
    Officer
    $1.03M
    @ $103.31 · 2024-12-11
    GAVINET ANDRES
    Officer
    $2.09M
    @ $104.29 · 2024-12-11
    KASS HUNTER
    President
    $530,650
    @ $106.13 · 2024-12-09
    CAIN JAMES P
    Director
    $42,456
    @ $124.87 · 2024-09-16
    CIRUZZI VINCENT R. JR
    Officer
    $855,756
    @ $123.29 · 2024-09-13
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.47M
    CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $4.01M
    @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ARE
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(39/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(39/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ARE
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
    INTC
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
    View ARE Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: ARE vs INTC

    Is Alexandria Real Estate Equities or Intel Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, ARE trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $9106274826 vs. price $51), compared to INTC's -1270.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $7 vs. $90).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alexandria Real Estate Equities or Intel Corporation?▼

    ARE scores 50/100 (Narrow moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Alexandria Real Estate Equities in financial distress?▼

    ARE's Altman Z-Score of 0.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTC scores 2.1 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alexandria Real Estate Equities or Intel Corporation?▼

    INTC earns 3.6% ROIC versus ARE's 1.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    ARE vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io