Compare StocksAPTV vs PFE

Aptiv PLC (APTV) vs Pfizer, Inc. (PFE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, APTV is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $156 and a margin of safety of 64%. PFE is undervalued at $25, with an intrinsic value of $127985960274 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, PFE has the wider margin of safety.

APTV
Aptiv PLC
$56.47
VS
PFE
Pfizer, Inc.
$25.01

Rewards

APTV
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 54.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Share count has been reduced by 21% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 2 out of 3 years showed value-accretive repurchases.
PFE
  • Gross margin of 74.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Trailing P/E of 19.1x is 37% below the historical average of 30.4x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

APTV
  • Gross margin of 18.9% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • PEG ratio of 2.94 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.38 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
APTV
PFE
Valuation
$1.53B
Free Cash Flow
$12.38B
12.79%
FCF Yield
N/A
33.61
Trailing P/E
19.09
8.35
Forward P/E
8.85
Quality & Moat
8.30%
ROIC
10.19%
4.08%
ROE
8.31%
18.92%
Gross Margin
74.80%
0.95
PEG Ratio
2.94
Balance Sheet Safety
0.71
Net Debt / Equity
0.57
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.11
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.03
0.00%
Dividend Yield
6.88%
APTV: 2Ties: 2PFE: 7
APTVPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
APTV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
APTV
$-1.86
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$4.86B
Δ Market Cap
$-9.05B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-26.34
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
APTV
32.0% Overvalued
Price is 32.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.47
Fair Value: $42.79
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $25.01
Fair Value: $127985960274.09
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
APTV

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $56?

+16.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +0.9%

The market implies +16.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +0.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $25?

-14.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -15.0%

The market implies -14.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding -15.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
APTV
51/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
APTV
-2.86
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
APTV
Insiders 0.8%Institutions 103.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,098
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.5%Retail & Other 30.4%
No. of Institutional Holders3,661
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
APTV
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $649,071
AGNEVALL HAKAN
Director
$352,153
@ $57.73 · 2026-05-08
AGNEVALL HAKAN
Director
$296,918
@ $80.25 · 2025-12-12
CLARK KEVIN P
Chief Executive Officer
$1.95M
@ $65.45 · 2024-09-11
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
APTV
2
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.88M
LOUISSAINT OBED D
Officer
$208,800
@ $69.60 · 2026-06-15
RAMUNDO KATHERINE HARGROVE
Officer
$156,600
@ $78.30 · 2026-06-03
RAMUNDO KATHERINE HARGROVE
Chief Operating Officer
$425,000
@ $85.00 · 2026-01-08
LAROYIA VARUN
Chief Financial Officer
$400,250
@ $80.05 · 2025-12-12
MAHONEY SEAN O
Director
$603,685
@ $76.60 · 2025-12-05
LAROYIA VARUN
Chief Financial Officer
$1.13M
@ $77.88 · 2025-12-04
RAMUNDO KATHERINE HARGROVE
Officer
$1.09M
@ $84.00 · 2025-11-10
BRAZIER ALLAN J
Officer
$85,000
@ $85.00 · 2025-09-18
BRAZIER ALLAN J
Officer
$523,120
@ $80.00 · 2025-08-26
LOUISSAINT OBED D
Officer
$240,000
@ $80.00 · 2025-08-26
MASSARO JOSEPH R
Officer
$2.60M
@ $74.36 · 2025-08-21
LOUISSAINT OBED D
Officer
$112,500
@ $75.00 · 2025-08-18
LOUISSAINT OBED D
Officer
$105,000
@ $70.00 · 2025-08-12
LOUISSAINT OBED D
Officer
$196,980
@ $65.66 · 2025-08-08
LYON BENJAMIN
Chief Technology Officer
$954,204
@ $65.50 · 2025-03-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $51,400
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$147,714
@ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
APTV
FearGreed
😨Fear(31/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
APTV
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (31)
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
View APTV Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: APTV vs PFE

Is Aptiv PLC or Pfizer, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PFE trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $127985960274 vs. price $25), compared to APTV's 63.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $156 vs. $56).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Aptiv PLC or Pfizer, Inc.?

APTV scores 51/100 (Narrow moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Pfizer, Inc. in financial distress?

PFE's Altman Z-Score of 1.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. APTV scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Aptiv PLC or Pfizer, Inc.?

PFE earns 10.2% ROIC versus APTV's 8.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

APTV vs PFE: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io