Compare StocksAPTV vs BRK-B

Aptiv PLC (APTV) vs Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, APTV is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $156 and a margin of safety of 64%. BRK-B is fairly valued at $512, with an intrinsic value of $637 and a margin of safety of 20%. Of the two, APTV has the wider margin of safety.

APTV
Aptiv PLC
$56.47
VS
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$511.54

Rewards

APTV
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 54.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Share count has been reduced by 21% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 2 out of 3 years showed value-accretive repurchases.
BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

APTV
  • Gross margin of 18.9% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 5.5% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Trailing P/E of 15.2x is 30% above the historical average of 11.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
APTV
BRK-B
Valuation
$1.53B
Free Cash Flow
$61.23B
12.79%
FCF Yield
5.55%
33.61
Trailing P/E
15.22
8.35
Forward P/E
23.71
Quality & Moat
8.30%
ROIC
4.96%
4.08%
ROE
10.50%
18.92%
Gross Margin
27.78%
0.95
PEG Ratio
10.06
Balance Sheet Safety
0.71
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.11
Net Debt / EBITDA
-2.28
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
APTV: 4Ties: 1BRK-B: 7
APTVBRK-B

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
APTV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
APTV
$-1.86
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$4.86B
Δ Market Cap
$-9.05B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
APTV
32.0% Overvalued
Price is 32.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.47
Fair Value: $42.79
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BRK-B
19.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 19.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $511.54
Fair Value: $636.63
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
APTV

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $56?

+16.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +0.9%

The market implies +16.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +0.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $512?

+1.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +2.5%

The market implies +1.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +2.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
APTV
51/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
APTV
-2.86
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
APTV
Insiders 0.8%Institutions 103.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,098
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.5%Retail & Other 32.2%
No. of Institutional Holders5,889
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
APTV
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $649,071
AGNEVALL HAKAN
Director
$352,153
@ $57.73 · 2026-05-08
AGNEVALL HAKAN
Director
$296,918
@ $80.25 · 2025-12-12
CLARK KEVIN P
Chief Executive Officer
$1.95M
@ $65.45 · 2024-09-11
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BRK-B
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $250,545
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,545
@ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
APTV
2
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.88M
LOUISSAINT OBED D
Officer
$208,800
@ $69.60 · 2026-06-15
RAMUNDO KATHERINE HARGROVE
Officer
$156,600
@ $78.30 · 2026-06-03
RAMUNDO KATHERINE HARGROVE
Chief Operating Officer
$425,000
@ $85.00 · 2026-01-08
LAROYIA VARUN
Chief Financial Officer
$400,250
@ $80.05 · 2025-12-12
MAHONEY SEAN O
Director
$603,685
@ $76.60 · 2025-12-05
LAROYIA VARUN
Chief Financial Officer
$1.13M
@ $77.88 · 2025-12-04
RAMUNDO KATHERINE HARGROVE
Officer
$1.09M
@ $84.00 · 2025-11-10
BRAZIER ALLAN J
Officer
$85,000
@ $85.00 · 2025-09-18
BRAZIER ALLAN J
Officer
$523,120
@ $80.00 · 2025-08-26
LOUISSAINT OBED D
Officer
$240,000
@ $80.00 · 2025-08-26
MASSARO JOSEPH R
Officer
$2.60M
@ $74.36 · 2025-08-21
LOUISSAINT OBED D
Officer
$112,500
@ $75.00 · 2025-08-18
LOUISSAINT OBED D
Officer
$105,000
@ $70.00 · 2025-08-12
LOUISSAINT OBED D
Officer
$196,980
@ $65.66 · 2025-08-08
LYON BENJAMIN
Chief Technology Officer
$954,204
@ $65.50 · 2025-03-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
APTV
FearGreed
😨Fear(31/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BRK-B
FearGreed
😏Greed(72/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
APTV
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (31)
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (72)
View APTV Full AnalysisView BRK-B Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: APTV vs BRK-B

Is Aptiv PLC or Berkshire Hathaway Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, APTV trades at a 63.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $156 vs. price $56), compared to BRK-B's 19.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $637 vs. $512).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Aptiv PLC or Berkshire Hathaway Inc.?

APTV scores 51/100 (Narrow moat), while BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Aptiv PLC in financial distress?

APTV's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. BRK-B scores 2.5 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Aptiv PLC or Berkshire Hathaway Inc.?

Aptiv PLC (APTV) generates a 12.8% free cash flow yield, compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc.'s 5.5%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Aptiv PLC or Berkshire Hathaway Inc.?

APTV earns 8.3% ROIC versus BRK-B's 5.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.