Compare StocksAPTV vs BAC

Aptiv PLC (APTV) vs Bank of America Corporation (BAC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, APTV is undervalued at $64, with a DCF intrinsic value of $121 and a margin of safety of 48%. BAC is undervalued at $56, with an intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

APTV
Aptiv PLC
$63.68
VS
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20

Rewards

APTV
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 54.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Share count has been reduced by 21% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 2 out of 3 years showed value-accretive repurchases.
BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

APTV
  • Gross margin of 18.9% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
APTV
BAC
Valuation
$1.53B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
11.35%
FCF Yield
N/A
37.90
Trailing P/E
13.95
9.34
Forward P/E
11.13
Quality & Moat
8.30%
ROIC
3.89%
4.08%
ROE
10.64%
18.92%
Gross Margin
0.00%
1.05
PEG Ratio
1.02
Balance Sheet Safety
0.71
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.11
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.00%
Dividend Yield
1.97%
APTV: 3Ties: 2BAC: 3
APTVBAC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
APTV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
APTV
$-1.86
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$4.86B
Δ Market Cap
$-9.05B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
APTV
118.2% Overvalued
Price is 118.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $63.68
Fair Value: $29.18
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
APTV

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $64?

+17.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +2.0%

The market implies +17.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +2.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
APTV
51/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
APTV
-2.86
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
APTV
Insiders 0.8%Institutions 102.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,114
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
APTV
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $649,071
AGNEVALL HAKAN
Director
$352,153
@ $57.73 · 2026-05-08
AGNEVALL HAKAN
Director
$296,918
@ $80.25 · 2025-12-12
CLARK KEVIN P
Chief Executive Officer
$1.95M
@ $65.45 · 2024-09-11
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
APTV
1
Sells (3M)
13
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.67M
RAMUNDO KATHERINE HARGROVE
Officer
$156,600
@ $78.30 · 2026-06-03
RAMUNDO KATHERINE HARGROVE
Chief Operating Officer
$425,000
@ $85.00 · 2026-01-08
LAROYIA VARUN
Chief Financial Officer
$400,250
@ $80.05 · 2025-12-12
MAHONEY SEAN O
Director
$603,685
@ $76.60 · 2025-12-05
LAROYIA VARUN
Chief Financial Officer
$1.13M
@ $77.88 · 2025-12-04
RAMUNDO KATHERINE HARGROVE
Officer
$1.09M
@ $84.00 · 2025-11-10
BRAZIER ALLAN J
Officer
$85,000
@ $85.00 · 2025-09-18
LOUISSAINT OBED D
Officer
$240,000
@ $80.00 · 2025-08-26
BRAZIER ALLAN J
Officer
$523,120
@ $80.00 · 2025-08-26
MASSARO JOSEPH R
Officer
$2.60M
@ $74.36 · 2025-08-21
LOUISSAINT OBED D
Officer
$112,500
@ $75.00 · 2025-08-18
LOUISSAINT OBED D
Officer
$105,000
@ $70.00 · 2025-08-12
LOUISSAINT OBED D
Officer
$196,980
@ $65.66 · 2025-08-08
LYON BENJAMIN
Chief Technology Officer
$954,204
@ $65.50 · 2025-03-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
APTV
FearGreed
😨Fear(36/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
APTV
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (36)
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
View APTV Full AnalysisView BAC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: APTV vs BAC

Is Aptiv PLC or Bank of America Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to APTV's 47.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $121 vs. $64).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Aptiv PLC or Bank of America Corporation?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while APTV scores 51/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. APTV scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Aptiv PLC or Bank of America Corporation?

APTV earns 8.3% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

APTV vs BAC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io