Compare StocksAPP vs CRM

AppLovin Corporation (APP) vs Salesforce, Inc. (CRM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-21, APP is undervalued at $470, with a DCF intrinsic value of $788 and a margin of safety of 40%. CRM is undervalued at $152, with an intrinsic value of $271 and a margin of safety of 44%. Of the two, CRM has the wider margin of safety.

APP
AppLovin Corporation
$469.71
VS
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$151.78

Rewards

APP
  • Gross margin of 88.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 112.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $6.63 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

APP
  • FCF yield of 2.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • 5 insider sales totaling $135.8M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
CRM

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    APP
    CRM
    Valuation
    $3.18B
    Free Cash Flow
    $16.55B
    2.02%
    FCF Yield
    13.32%
    40.81
    Trailing P/E
    17.57
    21.42
    Forward P/E
    9.80
    Quality & Moat
    61.25%
    ROIC
    9.61%
    266.44%
    ROE
    16.91%
    88.37%
    Gross Margin
    77.64%
    1.29
    PEG Ratio
    0.72
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.46
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.90
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.22
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.38
    0.00%
    Dividend Yield
    1.16%
    APP: 5Ties: 1CRM: 6
    APPCRM

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    APP

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    CRM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    APP
    $42.50
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $5.27B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$224.03B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    CRM
    $-7.99
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-117.14B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    APP
    40.4% Margin of Safety
    Price is 40.4% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $469.71
    Fair Value: $788.13
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    CRM
    43.9% Margin of Safety
    Price is 43.9% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $151.78
    Fair Value: $270.69
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    APP

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $470?

    +18.9%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +20.2%

    The market implies +18.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +20.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    CRM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $152?

    +3.6%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -2.8%

    The market implies +3.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -2.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    APP
    51/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    CRM
    58/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    APP
    -2.43
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    CRM
    -2.73
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    APP
    Insiders 18.3%Institutions 75.0%Retail & Other 6.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,976
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    CRM
    Insiders 3.0%Institutions 94.3%Retail & Other 2.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,721
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    APP
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    CRM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    5
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $27.38M
    ALBER LAURA
    Director
    $500,266
    @ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,178
    @ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,722
    @ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
    MORFIT G MASON
    Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $25.02M
    @ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $865,827
    @ $254.66 · 2025-09-09
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    APP
    5
    Sells (3M)
    27
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $687.93M
    VIVAS EDUARDO
    Director
    $82.62M
    @ $504.06 · 2026-06-16
    FOROUGHI ARASH ADAM
    Chief Executive Officer
    $25.31M
    @ $485.14 · 2026-06-12
    FOROUGHI ARASH ADAM
    Chief Executive Officer
    $11.16M
    @ $494.98 · 2026-06-12
    VALENZUELA VICTORIA
    Officer
    $11.32M
    @ $565.89 · 2026-06-04
    STUMPF MATTHEW
    Chief Financial Officer
    $5.43M
    @ $600.00 · 2026-05-28
    VIVAS EDUARDO
    Director
    $74.33M
    @ $453.49 · 2026-03-16
    VIVAS EDUARDO
    Director
    $9.59M
    @ $458.67 · 2026-03-13
    DOROSH DMITRIY
    Officer
    $1.41M
    @ $453.42 · 2026-03-13
    FOROUGHI ARASH ADAM
    Chief Executive Officer
    $27.50M
    @ $463.71 · 2026-03-12
    FOROUGHI ARASH ADAM
    Chief Executive Officer
    $18.72M
    @ $459.85 · 2026-03-12
    VALENZUELA VICTORIA
    Officer
    $5.00M
    @ $657.13 · 2025-12-18
    HARVEY DAWSON ALYSSA
    Director
    $103,998
    @ $693.32 · 2025-12-08
    SHIKIN VASILY
    Chief Technology Officer
    $14.80M
    @ $545.38 · 2025-11-24
    STUMPF MATTHEW
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.52M
    @ $515.76 · 2025-11-21
    HARVEY DAWSON ALYSSA
    Director
    $117,836
    @ $589.18 · 2025-11-12
    VIVAS EDUARDO
    Director
    $97.64M
    @ $650.91 · 2025-11-10
    BILLINGS CRAIG SCOTT
    Director
    $1.39M
    @ $592.92 · 2025-11-07
    HARVEY DAWSON ALYSSA
    Director
    $170,790
    @ $487.97 · 2025-09-05
    VALENZUELA VICTORIA
    Officer
    $17.58M
    @ $502.23 · 2025-09-04
    VALENZUELA VICTORIA
    Officer
    $6.75M
    @ $450.00 · 2025-08-25
    SHIKIN VASILY
    Chief Technology Officer
    $13.13M
    @ $437.57 · 2025-08-22
    FOROUGHI ARASH ADAM
    Chief Executive Officer
    $11.53M
    @ $440.23 · 2025-08-22
    VALENZUELA VICTORIA
    Officer
    $6.92M
    @ $416.71 · 2025-08-21
    STUMPF MATTHEW
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $416.18 · 2025-08-21
    CHEN HERALD Y
    Director
    $167.51M
    @ $456.43 · 2025-08-13
    CHEN HERALD Y
    Director
    $15.11M
    @ $457.93 · 2025-08-13
    VIVAS EDUARDO
    Director
    $58.25M
    @ $466.00 · 2025-08-12
    MESSING BARBARA
    Director
    $573,692
    @ $382.46 · 2025-06-11
    CHEN HERALD Y
    Director
    $41.99M
    @ $419.91 · 2025-06-06
    HARVEY DAWSON ALYSSA
    Director
    $1.45M
    @ $414.90 · 2025-06-06
    STUMPF MATTHEW
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.11M
    @ $423.00 · 2025-06-06
    VALENZUELA VICTORIA
    Officer
    $4.88M
    @ $369.79 · 2025-05-21
    HARVEY DAWSON ALYSSA
    Director
    $211,540
    @ $371.12 · 2025-05-13
    BILLINGS CRAIG SCOTT
    Director
    $4.24M
    @ $353.12 · 2025-05-12
    CHEN HERALD Y
    Director
    $64.93M
    @ $324.65 · 2025-02-28
    FOROUGHI ARASH ADAM
    Chief Executive Officer
    $19.24M
    @ $421.88 · 2025-02-24
    FOROUGHI ARASH ADAM
    Chief Executive Officer
    $18.24M
    @ $410.89 · 2025-02-24
    VALENZUELA VICTORIA
    Officer
    $5.00M
    @ $313.07 · 2024-12-19
    CHEN HERALD Y
    Director
    $32.62M
    @ $329.50 · 2024-12-12
    FOROUGHI ARASH ADAM
    Chief Executive Officer
    $17.19M
    @ $332.74 · 2024-12-11
    CHEN HERALD Y
    Director
    $63.92M
    @ $329.36 · 2024-12-10
    FOROUGHI ARASH ADAM
    Chief Executive Officer
    $18.82M
    @ $343.38 · 2024-12-10
    FOROUGHI ARASH ADAM
    Chief Executive Officer
    $14.47M
    @ $332.52 · 2024-12-10
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    CRM
    0
    Sells (3M)
    15
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $40.30M
    KROES NEELIE
    Director
    $929,276
    @ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
    HARRIS G PARKER
    Officer and Director
    $31.61M
    @ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $575,140
    @ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $590,102
    @ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $567,631
    @ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $550,430
    @ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $558,810
    @ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $536,322
    @ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $548,796
    @ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $547,344
    @ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $539,533
    @ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $555,001
    @ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $552,798
    @ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $545,384
    @ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    APP
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(29/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    CRM
    FearGreed
    🥶Extreme Fear(18/100)

    "Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    APP
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (29)
    CRM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (18)
    View APP Full AnalysisView CRM Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: APP vs CRM

    Is AppLovin Corporation or Salesforce, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, CRM trades at a 43.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $271 vs. price $152), compared to APP's 40.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $788 vs. $470).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, AppLovin Corporation or Salesforce, Inc.?

    CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat), while APP scores 51/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Salesforce, Inc. in financial distress?

    CRM's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. APP scores 30.2 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, AppLovin Corporation or Salesforce, Inc.?

    Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) generates a 13.3% free cash flow yield, compared to AppLovin Corporation's 2.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, AppLovin Corporation or Salesforce, Inc.?

    APP earns 61.3% ROIC versus CRM's 9.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.