Compare StocksAPO vs INTC

Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
$111.37
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18

Rewards

APO
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 24.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.94 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
INTC

    Risks

    APO
    • Apollo Global Management, Inc. scores only 27/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Trailing P/E of 20.1x is 40% above the historical average of 14.4x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.09 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    APO
    INTC
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $-4.50B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    -1.95%
    20.10
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    10.24
    Forward P/E
    46.59
    Quality & Moat
    5.37%
    ROIC
    1.24%
    7.99%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    37.34%
    Gross Margin
    36.56%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.99
    Debt / Equity
    0.37
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.77
    1.83%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    APO: 3Ties: 2INTC: 1
    APOINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    APO

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    APO
    $4.94
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $9.60B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$47.44B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    APO
    49.7% Margin of Safety
    Price is 49.7% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $111.37
    Fair Value: $221.22
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    APO

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    APO
    27/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    APO
    -2.31
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    APO
    Insiders 27.0%Institutions 68.0%Retail & Other 5.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,625
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    APO
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $67.78M
    RICHARDS PAULINE D E
    Director
    $78,071
    @ $141.95 · 2025-05-12
    LB 2018 GST TRUST
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $67.70M
    @ $111.39 · 2025-04-04
    BELARDI JAMES RICHARD
    Officer and Director
    $281.00
    @ $281.00 · 2025-02-28
    O'NEILL MITRA
    Director
    $100,053
    @ $108.40 · 2024-09-06
    RICHARDS PAULINE D E
    Director
    $246,657
    @ $104.92 · 2024-08-06
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    APO
    0
    Sells (3M)
    6
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $73.16M
    CHATTERJEE WHITNEY A
    Officer
    $1.24M
    @ $146.03 · 2025-12-10
    KELLY MARTIN B
    Chief Financial Officer
    $788,434
    @ $131.41 · 2025-12-01
    KELLY MARTIN B
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.25M
    @ $145.11 · 2025-08-12
    CHATTERJEE WHITNEY A
    Officer
    $657,149
    @ $146.03 · 2025-08-06
    KELLY MARTIN B
    Chief Financial Officer
    $530,272
    @ $132.57 · 2025-05-06
    BLACK LEON D
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $67.70M
    @ $111.39 · 2025-04-04
    BLACK LEON D
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $71.00M
    @ $142.00 · 2025-03-19
    KELLY MARTIN B
    Chief Financial Officer
    $791,378
    @ $158.28 · 2025-02-13
    KELLY MARTIN B
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.74M
    @ $173.66 · 2024-12-10
    TANGUY LOUIS-JACQUES
    Officer
    $441,250
    @ $176.50 · 2024-12-10
    KELLY MARTIN B
    Chief Financial Officer
    $863,050
    @ $172.61 · 2024-12-03
    CHATTERJEE WHITNEY A
    Officer
    $1.07M
    @ $173.36 · 2024-12-03
    KELLY MARTIN B
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.34M
    @ $111.29 · 2024-05-08
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    APO
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(39/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    APO
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View APO Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis
    Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) vs Intel Corporation (INTC) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io