Compare StocksAPH vs QCOM

Amphenol Corporation (APH) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, APH is overvalued at $164, with a DCF intrinsic value of $124 and a margin of safety of -32%. QCOM is overvalued at $226, with an intrinsic value of $128 and a margin of safety of -76%. Of the two, APH has the wider margin of safety.

APH
Amphenol Corporation
$163.96
VS
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$226.11

Rewards

APH
  • Amphenol Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Amphenol Corporation scores 71/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 34.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
QCOM
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

APH
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • FCF yield of 1.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
QCOM
  • FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • 15 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
APH
QCOM
Valuation
$3.56B
Free Cash Flow
$12.82B
1.77%
FCF Yield
5.38%
47.11
Trailing P/E
24.34
28.84
Forward P/E
21.20
Quality & Moat
17.01%
ROIC
18.22%
36.83%
ROE
36.08%
37.92%
Gross Margin
54.80%
1.36
PEG Ratio
0.91
Balance Sheet Safety
1.01
Net Debt / Equity
0.20
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.73
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.42
0.63%
Dividend Yield
1.72%
APH: 0Ties: 2QCOM: 10
APHQCOM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
APH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

QCOM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
APH
$17.92
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.72B
Δ Market Cap
+$120.47B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
QCOM
$5.06
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$11.96B
Δ Market Cap
+$60.46B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
APH
32.3% Overvalued
Price is 32.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $163.96
Fair Value: $123.98
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
QCOM
178.3% Overvalued
Price is 178.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $226.11
Fair Value: $81.25
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
APH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $164?

+20.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +22.9%

The market implies +20.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +22.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

QCOM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $226?

+17.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.0%

The market implies +17.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
APH
71/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
QCOM
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
APH
-2.44
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
QCOM
-3.16
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
APH
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 97.9%Retail & Other 1.6%
No. of Institutional Holders2,804
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
QCOM
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.8%Retail & Other 15.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,615
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
APH
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.29M
LIVINGSTON ROBERT A
Director
$1.29M
@ $128.51 · 2026-02-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
QCOM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
APH
1
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $283.41M
NORWITT RICHARD ADAM
Chief Executive Officer
$18.71M
@ $143.06 · 2026-05-05
D'AMICO LANCE E
General Counsel
$7.49M
@ $149.88 · 2026-02-18
LAMPO CRAIG A
Chief Financial Officer
$15.00M
@ $149.98 · 2026-02-18
DOHERTY WILLIAM J
Officer
$11.36M
@ $142.00 · 2025-12-02
STRAUB PETER JOHN
Officer
$18.72M
@ $141.84 · 2025-12-02
IVAS MICHAEL R
Officer
$16.81M
@ $140.05 · 2025-11-05
SILVERMAN DAVID M
Officer
$16.94M
@ $141.17 · 2025-11-03
IVAS MICHAEL R
Officer
$16.96M
@ $141.30 · 2025-10-31
D'AMICO LANCE E
General Counsel
$16.80M
@ $140.01 · 2025-10-29
DOHERTY WILLIAM J
Officer
$11.28M
@ $141.04 · 2025-10-29
WALTER LUC
Officer
$49.16M
@ $134.65 · 2025-10-24
STRAUB PETER JOHN
Officer
$9.74M
@ $110.64 · 2025-09-08
SILVERMAN DAVID M
Officer
$11.04M
@ $110.42 · 2025-08-25
LAMPO CRAIG A
Chief Financial Officer
$22.07M
@ $110.43 · 2025-08-22
D'AMICO LANCE E
General Counsel
$11.06M
@ $110.60 · 2025-08-18
DOHERTY WILLIAM J
Officer
$24.77M
@ $109.59 · 2025-08-11
IVAS MICHAEL R
Officer
$5.50M
@ $110.02 · 2025-08-08
WALTER LUC
President
$26.15M
@ $91.43 · 2025-06-03
SILVERMAN DAVID M
Officer
$8.91M
@ $89.09 · 2025-05-30
DOHERTY WILLIAM J
Officer
$14.33M
@ $89.54 · 2025-05-30
IVAS MICHAEL R
Officer
$3.55M
@ $88.79 · 2025-05-29
D'AMICO LANCE E
General Counsel
$8.64M
@ $86.36 · 2025-05-13
SILVERMAN DAVID M
Officer
$7.00M
@ $80.03 · 2025-05-02
DOHERTY WILLIAM J
Officer
$10.12M
@ $80.28 · 2025-05-02
SILVERMAN DAVID M
Officer
$7.59M
@ $75.88 · 2025-04-25
LAMPO CRAIG A
Chief Financial Officer
$30.37M
@ $75.93 · 2025-04-25
DOHERTY WILLIAM J
Officer
$7.55M
@ $75.49 · 2025-04-25
NORWITT RICHARD ADAM
Chief Executive Officer
$151.46M
@ $75.73 · 2025-04-25
WALTER LUC
Officer
$29.61M
@ $75.91 · 2025-04-25
STRAUB PETER JOHN
Officer
$9.78M
@ $74.12 · 2024-11-08
SILVERMAN DAVID M
Officer
$12.93M
@ $71.81 · 2024-11-06
LAMPO CRAIG A
Chief Financial Officer
$21.47M
@ $71.56 · 2024-11-06
D'AMICO LANCE E
General Counsel
$5.16M
@ $68.80 · 2024-10-30
SILVERMAN DAVID M
Officer
$12.39M
@ $68.84 · 2024-10-29
LAMPO CRAIG A
Chief Financial Officer
$10.31M
@ $68.76 · 2024-10-29
D'AMICO LANCE E
General Counsel
$6.56M
@ $65.63 · 2024-08-15
DOHERTY WILLIAM J
Officer
$19.75M
@ $65.83 · 2024-08-15
LAMPO CRAIG A
Chief Financial Officer
$16.25M
@ $65.01 · 2024-08-14
NORWITT RICHARD ADAM
Chief Executive Officer
$25.71M
@ $64.28 · 2024-07-31
WALTER LUC
Officer
$17.70M
@ $64.13 · 2024-07-29
D'AMICO LANCE E
General Counsel
$5.82M
@ $64.65 · 2024-07-26
NORWITT RICHARD ADAM
Chief Executive Officer
$48.40M
@ $64.54 · 2024-07-26
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
QCOM
3
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $12.65M
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,380
@ $197.35 · 2026-06-11
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$529,741
@ $211.90 · 2026-05-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$325,854
@ $130.34 · 2026-04-13
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$330,815
@ $132.33 · 2026-03-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$458,799
@ $137.65 · 2026-02-06
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$577,620
@ $173.30 · 2026-01-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$2.20M
@ $175.29 · 2025-12-19
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$2.83M
@ $178.01 · 2025-12-16
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.28M
@ $178.03 · 2025-12-16
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$567,702
@ $170.33 · 2025-11-07
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$1.38M
@ $166.06 · 2025-10-20
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$522,808
@ $156.86 · 2025-09-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$122,463
@ $154.82 · 2025-08-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,610
@ $148.10 · 2025-08-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$537,560
@ $161.28 · 2025-07-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$486,965
@ $146.10 · 2025-06-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$120,808
@ $153.70 · 2025-05-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$465,846
@ $139.77 · 2025-05-05
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$91,442
@ $141.11 · 2025-04-09
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$119,900
@ $132.63 · 2025-04-08
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$235,262
@ $132.10 · 2025-04-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$523,292
@ $156.82 · 2025-03-03
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$130,074
@ $174.83 · 2025-02-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$509,397
@ $169.80 · 2025-02-12
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$3.28M
@ $169.83 · 2025-02-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$463,851
@ $154.62 · 2025-01-02
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$409,056
@ $158.12 · 2024-12-16
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$1.67M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.24M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$484,617
@ $161.54 · 2024-12-05
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$202,120
@ $155.00 · 2024-11-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$491,349
@ $163.78 · 2024-11-14
THOMPSON JAMES H.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.38M
@ $172.09 · 2024-11-08
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$313,779
@ $165.06 · 2024-11-04
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$539,157
@ $166.15 · 2024-10-02
THOMPSON JAMES H.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.36M
@ $169.80 · 2024-10-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
APH
FearGreed
😏Greed(66/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
QCOM
FearGreed
😐Neutral(50/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
APH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (66)
QCOM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
View APH Full AnalysisView QCOM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: APH vs QCOM

Is Amphenol Corporation or QUALCOMM Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, APH trades at a -32.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $124 vs. price $164), compared to QCOM's -76.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $128 vs. $226).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Amphenol Corporation or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

QCOM scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while APH scores 71/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Amphenol Corporation or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) generates a 5.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Amphenol Corporation's 1.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Amphenol Corporation or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

QCOM earns 18.2% ROIC versus APH's 17.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Amphenol Corporation's or QUALCOMM Incorporated's?

APH's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to QCOM's 84/100 (Very Safe). APH has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

APH vs QCOM: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io