Compare StocksAPH vs INTC

Amphenol Corporation (APH) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

APH
Amphenol Corporation
$130.65
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18

Rewards

APH
  • Amphenol Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Amphenol Corporation scores 71/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 34.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
INTC

    Risks

    APH
    • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
    • FCF yield of 2.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    APH
    INTC
    Valuation
    $4.38B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-4.50B
    2.73%
    FCF Yield
    -1.95%
    39.12
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    25.39
    Forward P/E
    46.59
    Quality & Moat
    16.94%
    ROIC
    1.24%
    31.61%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    37.22%
    Gross Margin
    36.56%
    0.68
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.19
    Debt / Equity
    0.37
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.66
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.77
    0.77%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    APH: 6Ties: 2INTC: 1
    APHINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    APH

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    APH
    $17.92
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $6.72B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$120.47B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    APH
    3.1% Overvalued
    Price is 3.1% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $130.65
    Fair Value: $126.77
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    APH

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $131?

    +16.7%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +16.3%

    The market implies +16.7% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +16.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    APH
    71/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    APH
    -2.44
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    APH
    Insiders 0.5%Institutions 97.9%Retail & Other 1.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,687
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    APH
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.29M
    LIVINGSTON ROBERT A
    Director
    $1.29M
    @ $128.51 · 2026-02-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    APH
    2
    Sells (3M)
    28
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $569.96M
    D'AMICO LANCE E
    General Counsel
    $7.49M
    @ $149.88 · 2026-02-18
    LAMPO CRAIG A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $15.00M
    @ $149.98 · 2026-02-18
    STRAUB PETER JOHN
    Officer
    $18.72M
    @ $141.84 · 2025-12-02
    DOHERTY WILLIAM J
    Officer
    $11.36M
    @ $142.00 · 2025-12-02
    IVAS MICHAEL R
    Officer
    $16.81M
    @ $140.05 · 2025-11-05
    SILVERMAN DAVID M
    Officer
    $16.94M
    @ $141.17 · 2025-11-03
    IVAS MICHAEL R
    Officer
    $16.96M
    @ $141.30 · 2025-10-31
    DOHERTY WILLIAM J
    Officer
    $11.28M
    @ $141.04 · 2025-10-29
    D'AMICO LANCE E
    General Counsel
    $16.80M
    @ $140.01 · 2025-10-29
    WALTER LUC
    Officer
    $49.16M
    @ $134.65 · 2025-10-24
    STRAUB PETER JOHN
    Officer
    $9.74M
    @ $110.64 · 2025-09-08
    SILVERMAN DAVID M
    Officer
    $11.04M
    @ $110.42 · 2025-08-25
    LAMPO CRAIG A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $22.07M
    @ $110.43 · 2025-08-22
    D'AMICO LANCE E
    General Counsel
    $11.06M
    @ $110.60 · 2025-08-18
    DOHERTY WILLIAM J
    Officer
    $24.77M
    @ $109.59 · 2025-08-11
    IVAS MICHAEL R
    Officer
    $5.50M
    @ $110.02 · 2025-08-08
    WALTER LUC
    President
    $26.15M
    @ $91.43 · 2025-06-03
    SILVERMAN DAVID M
    Officer
    $8.91M
    @ $89.09 · 2025-05-30
    DOHERTY WILLIAM J
    Officer
    $14.33M
    @ $89.54 · 2025-05-30
    IVAS MICHAEL R
    Officer
    $3.55M
    @ $88.79 · 2025-05-29
    D'AMICO LANCE E
    General Counsel
    $8.64M
    @ $86.36 · 2025-05-13
    SILVERMAN DAVID M
    Officer
    $7.00M
    @ $80.03 · 2025-05-02
    DOHERTY WILLIAM J
    Officer
    $10.12M
    @ $80.28 · 2025-05-02
    SILVERMAN DAVID M
    Officer
    $7.59M
    @ $75.88 · 2025-04-25
    DOHERTY WILLIAM J
    Officer
    $7.55M
    @ $75.49 · 2025-04-25
    LAMPO CRAIG A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $30.37M
    @ $75.93 · 2025-04-25
    NORWITT RICHARD ADAM
    Chief Executive Officer
    $151.46M
    @ $75.73 · 2025-04-25
    WALTER LUC
    Officer
    $29.61M
    @ $75.91 · 2025-04-25
    STRAUB PETER JOHN
    Officer
    $9.78M
    @ $74.12 · 2024-11-08
    SILVERMAN DAVID M
    Officer
    $12.93M
    @ $71.81 · 2024-11-06
    LAMPO CRAIG A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $21.47M
    @ $71.56 · 2024-11-06
    D'AMICO LANCE E
    General Counsel
    $5.16M
    @ $68.80 · 2024-10-30
    SILVERMAN DAVID M
    Officer
    $12.39M
    @ $68.84 · 2024-10-29
    LAMPO CRAIG A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $10.31M
    @ $68.76 · 2024-10-29
    DOHERTY WILLIAM J
    Officer
    $19.75M
    @ $65.83 · 2024-08-15
    D'AMICO LANCE E
    General Counsel
    $6.56M
    @ $65.63 · 2024-08-15
    LAMPO CRAIG A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $16.25M
    @ $65.01 · 2024-08-14
    NORWITT RICHARD ADAM
    Chief Executive Officer
    $25.71M
    @ $64.28 · 2024-07-31
    WALTER LUC
    Officer
    $17.70M
    @ $64.13 · 2024-07-29
    D'AMICO LANCE E
    General Counsel
    $5.82M
    @ $64.65 · 2024-07-26
    NORWITT RICHARD ADAM
    Chief Executive Officer
    $48.40M
    @ $64.54 · 2024-07-26
    WALTER LUC
    Officer
    $25.04M
    @ $135.34 · 2024-05-23
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    APH
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(46/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    APH
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (46)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View APH Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis