Compare Stocks › APH vs GOOGL

Amphenol Corporation (APH) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, APH is undervalued at $79, with a DCF intrinsic value of $105 and a margin of safety of 24%. GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. Of the two, APH has the wider margin of safety.

APH
Amphenol Corporation
$79.30
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84

Rewards

APH
  • ★Amphenol Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Amphenol Corporation scores 71/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 34.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

APH
  • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 2.2% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
GOOGL

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    APH
    GOOGL
    Valuation
    $4.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-1.16B
    2.19%
    FCF Yield
    -0.03%
    34.33
    Trailing P/E
    14.61
    22.07
    Forward P/E
    18.49
    Quality & Moat
    22.05%
    ROIC
    14.30%
    40.08%
    ROE
    44.29%
    39.21%
    Gross Margin
    60.86%
    0.80
    PEG Ratio
    0.98
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.73
    Net Debt / Equity
    Net cash
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    1.15
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -0.62
    0.76%
    Dividend Yield
    0.31%
    APH: 5Ties: 1GOOGL: 6
    APHGOOGL

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    APH

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    APH
    $17.92
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $6.72B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$120.47B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    APH
    24.3% Margin of Safety
    Price is 24.3% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $79.30
    Fair Value: $104.72
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    GOOGL
    3447.8% Overvalued
    Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $279.84
    Fair Value: $7.89
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    APH

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $79?

    +19.9%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +19.8%

    The market implies +19.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +19.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    GOOGL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    APH
    71/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    APH
    -2.44
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    APH
    Insiders 0.5%Institutions 96.7%Retail & Other 2.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,119
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,451
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    APH
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.29M
    LIVINGSTON ROBERT A
    Director
    $1.29M
    @ $128.51 · 2026-02-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    APH
    2
    Sells (3M)
    9
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $158.26M
    SILVERMAN DAVID M
    Officer
    $20.91M
    @ $174.24 · 2026-08-05
    LAMPO CRAIG A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $32.32M
    @ $167.31 · 2026-08-04
    NORWITT RICHARD ADAM
    Chief Executive Officer
    $18.71M
    @ $143.06 · 2026-05-05
    LAMPO CRAIG A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $15.00M
    @ $149.98 · 2026-02-18
    D'AMICO LANCE E
    General Counsel
    $7.49M
    @ $149.88 · 2026-02-18
    DOHERTY WILLIAM J
    Officer
    $11.36M
    @ $142.00 · 2025-12-02
    STRAUB PETER JOHN
    Officer
    $18.72M
    @ $141.84 · 2025-12-02
    IVAS MICHAEL R
    Officer
    $16.81M
    @ $140.05 · 2025-11-05
    SILVERMAN DAVID M
    Officer
    $16.94M
    @ $141.17 · 2025-11-03
    IVAS MICHAEL R
    Officer
    $16.96M
    @ $141.30 · 2025-10-31
    DOHERTY WILLIAM J
    Officer
    $11.28M
    @ $141.04 · 2025-10-29
    D'AMICO LANCE E
    General Counsel
    $16.80M
    @ $140.01 · 2025-10-29
    WALTER LUC
    Officer
    $49.16M
    @ $134.65 · 2025-10-24
    STRAUB PETER JOHN
    Officer
    $9.74M
    @ $110.64 · 2025-09-08
    SILVERMAN DAVID M
    Officer
    $11.04M
    @ $110.42 · 2025-08-25
    LAMPO CRAIG A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $22.07M
    @ $110.43 · 2025-08-22
    D'AMICO LANCE E
    General Counsel
    $11.06M
    @ $110.60 · 2025-08-18
    DOHERTY WILLIAM J
    Officer
    $24.77M
    @ $109.59 · 2025-08-11
    IVAS MICHAEL R
    Officer
    $5.50M
    @ $110.02 · 2025-08-08
    WALTER LUC
    President
    $26.15M
    @ $91.43 · 2025-06-03
    SILVERMAN DAVID M
    Officer
    $8.91M
    @ $89.09 · 2025-05-30
    DOHERTY WILLIAM J
    Officer
    $14.33M
    @ $89.54 · 2025-05-30
    IVAS MICHAEL R
    Officer
    $3.55M
    @ $88.79 · 2025-05-29
    D'AMICO LANCE E
    General Counsel
    $8.64M
    @ $86.36 · 2025-05-13
    SILVERMAN DAVID M
    Officer
    $7.00M
    @ $80.03 · 2025-05-02
    DOHERTY WILLIAM J
    Officer
    $10.12M
    @ $80.28 · 2025-05-02
    SILVERMAN DAVID M
    Officer
    $7.59M
    @ $75.88 · 2025-04-25
    DOHERTY WILLIAM J
    Officer
    $7.55M
    @ $75.49 · 2025-04-25
    LAMPO CRAIG A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $30.37M
    @ $75.93 · 2025-04-25
    WALTER LUC
    Officer
    $29.61M
    @ $75.91 · 2025-04-25
    NORWITT RICHARD ADAM
    Chief Executive Officer
    $151.46M
    @ $75.73 · 2025-04-25
    STRAUB PETER JOHN
    Officer
    $9.78M
    @ $74.12 · 2024-11-08
    SILVERMAN DAVID M
    Officer
    $12.93M
    @ $71.81 · 2024-11-06
    LAMPO CRAIG A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $21.47M
    @ $71.56 · 2024-11-06
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    APH
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(52/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(23/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    APH
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
    GOOGL
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
    View APH Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: APH vs GOOGL

    Is Amphenol Corporation or Alphabet Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, APH trades at a 24.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $105 vs. price $79), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Amphenol Corporation or Alphabet Inc.?▼

    GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while APH scores 71/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?▼

    GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. APH scores 6.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Amphenol Corporation or Alphabet Inc.?▼

    Amphenol Corporation (APH) generates a 2.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s -0.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Amphenol Corporation or Alphabet Inc.?▼

    APH earns 22.0% ROIC versus GOOGL's 14.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Amphenol Corporation's or Alphabet Inc.'s?▼

    APH's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to GOOGL's 88/100 (Very Safe). APH has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.