Compare StocksAPH vs BRK-B

Amphenol Corporation (APH) vs Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-21, APH is overvalued at $164, with a DCF intrinsic value of $124 and a margin of safety of -32%. BRK-B is undervalued at $489, with an intrinsic value of $644 and a margin of safety of 24%. Of the two, BRK-B has the wider margin of safety.

APH
Amphenol Corporation
$163.96
VS
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$489.46

Rewards

APH
  • Amphenol Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Amphenol Corporation scores 71/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 34.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

APH
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • FCF yield of 1.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 5.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
APH
BRK-B
Valuation
$3.56B
Free Cash Flow
$61.23B
1.77%
FCF Yield
5.80%
47.11
Trailing P/E
14.58
28.84
Forward P/E
22.79
Quality & Moat
17.01%
ROIC
4.96%
36.83%
ROE
10.50%
37.92%
Gross Margin
27.78%
1.40
PEG Ratio
10.06
Balance Sheet Safety
1.01
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.73
Net Debt / EBITDA
-2.28
0.61%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
APH: 5Ties: 1BRK-B: 6
APHBRK-B

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
APH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
APH
$17.92
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.72B
Δ Market Cap
+$120.47B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
APH
32.3% Overvalued
Price is 32.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $163.96
Fair Value: $123.98
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BRK-B
24.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 24.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $489.46
Fair Value: $643.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
APH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $164?

+20.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +22.9%

The market implies +20.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +22.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $489?

+0.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.6%

The market implies +0.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
APH
71/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
APH
-2.44
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
APH
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 97.9%Retail & Other 1.6%
No. of Institutional Holders2,805
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.3%Retail & Other 32.4%
No. of Institutional Holders5,905
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
APH
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.29M
LIVINGSTON ROBERT A
Director
$1.29M
@ $128.51 · 2026-02-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BRK-B
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $250,545
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,545
@ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
APH
1
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $283.41M
NORWITT RICHARD ADAM
Chief Executive Officer
$18.71M
@ $143.06 · 2026-05-05
LAMPO CRAIG A
Chief Financial Officer
$15.00M
@ $149.98 · 2026-02-18
D'AMICO LANCE E
General Counsel
$7.49M
@ $149.88 · 2026-02-18
DOHERTY WILLIAM J
Officer
$11.36M
@ $142.00 · 2025-12-02
STRAUB PETER JOHN
Officer
$18.72M
@ $141.84 · 2025-12-02
IVAS MICHAEL R
Officer
$16.81M
@ $140.05 · 2025-11-05
SILVERMAN DAVID M
Officer
$16.94M
@ $141.17 · 2025-11-03
IVAS MICHAEL R
Officer
$16.96M
@ $141.30 · 2025-10-31
D'AMICO LANCE E
General Counsel
$16.80M
@ $140.01 · 2025-10-29
DOHERTY WILLIAM J
Officer
$11.28M
@ $141.04 · 2025-10-29
WALTER LUC
Officer
$49.16M
@ $134.65 · 2025-10-24
STRAUB PETER JOHN
Officer
$9.74M
@ $110.64 · 2025-09-08
SILVERMAN DAVID M
Officer
$11.04M
@ $110.42 · 2025-08-25
LAMPO CRAIG A
Chief Financial Officer
$22.07M
@ $110.43 · 2025-08-22
D'AMICO LANCE E
General Counsel
$11.06M
@ $110.60 · 2025-08-18
DOHERTY WILLIAM J
Officer
$24.77M
@ $109.59 · 2025-08-11
IVAS MICHAEL R
Officer
$5.50M
@ $110.02 · 2025-08-08
WALTER LUC
President
$26.15M
@ $91.43 · 2025-06-03
SILVERMAN DAVID M
Officer
$8.91M
@ $89.09 · 2025-05-30
DOHERTY WILLIAM J
Officer
$14.33M
@ $89.54 · 2025-05-30
IVAS MICHAEL R
Officer
$3.55M
@ $88.79 · 2025-05-29
D'AMICO LANCE E
General Counsel
$8.64M
@ $86.36 · 2025-05-13
SILVERMAN DAVID M
Officer
$7.00M
@ $80.03 · 2025-05-02
DOHERTY WILLIAM J
Officer
$10.12M
@ $80.28 · 2025-05-02
LAMPO CRAIG A
Chief Financial Officer
$30.37M
@ $75.93 · 2025-04-25
WALTER LUC
Officer
$29.61M
@ $75.91 · 2025-04-25
NORWITT RICHARD ADAM
Chief Executive Officer
$151.46M
@ $75.73 · 2025-04-25
SILVERMAN DAVID M
Officer
$7.59M
@ $75.88 · 2025-04-25
DOHERTY WILLIAM J
Officer
$7.55M
@ $75.49 · 2025-04-25
STRAUB PETER JOHN
Officer
$9.78M
@ $74.12 · 2024-11-08
LAMPO CRAIG A
Chief Financial Officer
$21.47M
@ $71.56 · 2024-11-06
SILVERMAN DAVID M
Officer
$12.93M
@ $71.81 · 2024-11-06
D'AMICO LANCE E
General Counsel
$5.16M
@ $68.80 · 2024-10-30
LAMPO CRAIG A
Chief Financial Officer
$10.31M
@ $68.76 · 2024-10-29
SILVERMAN DAVID M
Officer
$12.39M
@ $68.84 · 2024-10-29
D'AMICO LANCE E
General Counsel
$6.56M
@ $65.63 · 2024-08-15
DOHERTY WILLIAM J
Officer
$19.75M
@ $65.83 · 2024-08-15
LAMPO CRAIG A
Chief Financial Officer
$16.25M
@ $65.01 · 2024-08-14
NORWITT RICHARD ADAM
Chief Executive Officer
$25.71M
@ $64.28 · 2024-07-31
WALTER LUC
Officer
$17.70M
@ $64.13 · 2024-07-29
D'AMICO LANCE E
General Counsel
$5.82M
@ $64.65 · 2024-07-26
NORWITT RICHARD ADAM
Chief Executive Officer
$48.40M
@ $64.54 · 2024-07-26
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
APH
FearGreed
😏Greed(66/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BRK-B
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
APH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (66)
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
View APH Full AnalysisView BRK-B Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: APH vs BRK-B

Is Amphenol Corporation or Berkshire Hathaway Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BRK-B trades at a 24.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $644 vs. price $489), compared to APH's -32.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $124 vs. $164).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Amphenol Corporation or Berkshire Hathaway Inc.?

APH scores 71/100 (Wide moat), while BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. in financial distress?

BRK-B's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. APH scores 6.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Amphenol Corporation or Berkshire Hathaway Inc.?

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) generates a 5.8% free cash flow yield, compared to Amphenol Corporation's 1.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Amphenol Corporation or Berkshire Hathaway Inc.?

APH earns 17.0% ROIC versus BRK-B's 5.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.