Compare Stocks › APD vs GOOGL

Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, APD is overvalued at $316, with a DCF intrinsic value of $137 and a margin of safety of -130%. GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. Of the two, APD has the wider margin of safety.

APD
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
$316.43
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84

Rewards

APD
    GOOGL
    • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    APD
    • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.28 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • ⚠Market sentiment is in extreme greed territory (score: 76/100) — elevated optimism may warrant caution.
    GOOGL

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      APD
      GOOGL
      Valuation
      $-1.50B
      Free Cash Flow
      $-1.16B
      -2.13%
      FCF Yield
      -0.03%
      N/A
      Trailing P/E
      14.61
      21.91
      Forward P/E
      18.49
      Quality & Moat
      7.29%
      ROIC
      14.30%
      0.02%
      ROE
      44.29%
      32.06%
      Gross Margin
      60.86%
      2.28
      PEG Ratio
      0.98
      Balance Sheet Safety
      1.04
      Net Debt / Equity
      Net cash
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      3.71
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      -0.62
      2.29%
      Dividend Yield
      0.31%
      APD: 1Ties: 1GOOGL: 9
      APDGOOGL

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      APD

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      GOOGL

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      APD
      $-12.31
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $1.09B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-13.40B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      GOOGL
      $9.18
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Exceptional Value Creator
      Σ Retained
      $288.67B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$2.65T
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      APD
      Insufficient Data
      Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
      Current Price: $316.43
      Fair Value: $0.00
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      GOOGL
      3447.8% Overvalued
      Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $279.84
      Fair Value: $7.89
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      APD

      Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

      GOOGL

      Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      APD
      37/100
      No Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      GOOGL
      89/100
      Wide Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      APD
      -2.50
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      GOOGL
      -2.92
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      APD
      Insiders 1.9%Institutions 94.5%Retail & Other 3.6%
      No. of Institutional Holders2,249
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      GOOGL
      Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
      No. of Institutional Holders7,451
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      APD
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      EVANS ANDREW W
      Director
      $1,475
      @ $295.00 · 2025-04-02
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      GOOGL
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      No open market insider purchases found.
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      APD
      0
      Sells (3M)
      1
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $824,405
      SCHAEFFER MELISSA N
      Chief Financial Officer
      $824,405
      @ $303.76 · 2026-05-01
      BRIFO VICTORIA
      Officer
      $397,344
      @ $292.38 · 2025-08-05
      EVANS ANDREW W
      Director
      $1,416
      @ $283.20 · 2025-04-03
      NELSON WALTER L
      Officer
      $181,706
      @ $308.50 · 2025-03-05
      KURT LEFEVERE
      Officer
      $474,255
      @ $316.17 · 2025-02-20
      BRIFO VICTORIA
      Officer
      $745,967
      @ $315.82 · 2025-02-18
      MOK WILBUR
      Officer
      $410,644
      @ $315.88 · 2025-02-18
      BOLS IVO
      Officer
      $5.65M
      @ $313.82 · 2025-02-18
      GALOVICH BRIAN
      Chief Investment Officer
      $659,685
      @ $315.79 · 2025-02-13
      HABABOU AHMED
      Officer
      $495,216
      @ $307.97 · 2025-02-11
      SCHAEFFER MELISSA N
      Chief Financial Officer
      $993,566
      @ $307.32 · 2025-02-10
      MAIONE FRANCESCO
      Officer
      $616,896
      @ $306.00 · 2025-02-10
      MAJOR SEAN JOHN D
      General Counsel
      $1.42M
      @ $315.46 · 2025-02-07
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      GOOGL
      0
      Sells (3M)
      0
      Sells (12M)
      No open market insider sales found.
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      APD
      FearGreed
      😏Greed(76/100)

      "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      GOOGL
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(23/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      APD
      ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (76)
      GOOGL
      ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
      View APD Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: APD vs GOOGL

      Is Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. or Alphabet Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, APD trades at a -130.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $137 vs. price $316), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. or Alphabet Inc.?▼

      GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while APD scores 37/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?▼

      GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. APD scores 2.6 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which company has better free cash flow, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. or Alphabet Inc.?▼

      Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) generates a -0.0% free cash flow yield, compared to Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.'s -2.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. or Alphabet Inc.?▼

      GOOGL earns 14.3% ROIC versus APD's 7.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      Which dividend is safer, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.'s or Alphabet Inc.'s?▼

      GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to APD's 59/100 (Borderline). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

      APD vs GOOGL: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io