Compare StocksAOS vs CRM

A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) vs Salesforce, Inc. (CRM)

AOS
A. O. Smith Corporation
$64.54
VS
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$194.99

Rewards

AOS
  • A. O. Smith Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • A. O. Smith Corporation scores 95/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 19.4% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 4 years showed value-accretive repurchases.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AOS
CRM
Valuation
$426.16M
Free Cash Flow
$16.37B
4.77%
FCF Yield
8.96%
16.76
Trailing P/E
25.00
14.86
Forward P/E
13.08
Quality & Moat
26.34%
ROIC
8.21%
29.40%
ROE
12.61%
38.83%
Gross Margin
77.68%
0.88
PEG Ratio
1.40
Balance Sheet Safety
0.11
Debt / Equity
0.30
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.01
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.65
2.17%
Dividend Yield
0.90%
AOS: 7Ties: 1CRM: 4
AOSCRM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AOS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

CRM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AOS
$0.57
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$1.07B
Δ Market Cap
+$612.2M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
CRM
$-5.25
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$14.67B
Δ Market Cap
$-76.99B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AOS
26.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 26.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $64.54
Fair Value: $87.59
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
CRM
13.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 13.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $194.99
Fair Value: $224.03
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AOS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $65?

+5.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.4%

The market implies +5.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +8.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

CRM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $195?

+11.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +0.3%

The market implies +11.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +0.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AOS
95/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
CRM
58/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AOS
-2.50
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
CRM
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AOS
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 108.0%
No. of Institutional Holders903
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
CRM
Insiders 2.7%Institutions 85.0%Retail & Other 12.3%
No. of Institutional Holders3,962
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AOS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
CRM
0
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $26.38M
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,722
@ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
MORFIT G MASON
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$25.02M
@ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$865,827
@ $254.66 · 2025-09-09
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AOS
2
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.11M
SCHUH DARRELL W
Officer
$82,126
@ $74.39 · 2026-03-04
SCHUH DARRELL W
Officer
$28,439
@ $79.88 · 2026-02-13
STERN JAMES F
General Counsel
$1.24M
@ $71.24 · 2025-08-07
WHEELER KEVIN J.
Officer and Director
$1.58M
@ $71.26 · 2025-07-30
SMITH MARK D
Director
$171,264
@ $71.36 · 2025-07-29
HEIDEMAN ROBERT JAMES
Chief Technology Officer
$67,357
@ $65.65 · 2025-02-07
KARGE DOUGLAS SAMUEL
Officer
$27,507
@ $65.65 · 2025-02-07
CARVER SAMUEL M
Officer
$1.19M
@ $81.00 · 2024-08-07
BROWN RONALD DALE
Director
$311,071
@ $85.67 · 2024-07-30
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
CRM
1
Sells (3M)
19
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $42.55M
KROES NEELIE
Director
$929,276
@ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
HARRIS G PARKER
Officer and Director
$31.61M
@ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$575,140
@ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$590,102
@ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$567,631
@ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$550,430
@ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$558,810
@ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$536,322
@ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$548,796
@ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$1.10M
@ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$547,344
@ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$539,533
@ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$555,001
@ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$552,798
@ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$545,384
@ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$543,378
@ $241.50 · 2025-09-04
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$572,842
@ $254.60 · 2025-09-03
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$571,202
@ $253.87 · 2025-08-28
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$557,034
@ $247.57 · 2025-08-25
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AOS
FearGreed
😨Fear(36/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
CRM
FearGreed
😨Fear(37/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AOS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (36)
CRM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
View AOS Full AnalysisView CRM Full Analysis