SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › AOS vs BAC

A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) vs Bank of America Corporation (BAC)

AOS
A. O. Smith Corporation
$64.54
VS
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$47.01

Rewards

AOS
  • ★A. O. Smith Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★A. O. Smith Corporation scores 95/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 19.4% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
BAC
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.37 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.58 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

AOS
    BAC
    • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • ⚠Bank of America Corporation scores only 20/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    AOS
    BAC
    Valuation
    $426.16M
    Free Cash Flow
    N/A
    4.77%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    16.76
    Trailing P/E
    12.34
    14.86
    Forward P/E
    9.49
    Quality & Moat
    26.34%
    ROIC
    4.61%
    29.40%
    ROE
    N/A
    38.83%
    Gross Margin
    0.00%
    0.88
    PEG Ratio
    0.58
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.11
    Debt / Equity
    N/A
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.01
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    N/A
    2.17%
    Dividend Yield
    2.38%
    AOS: 2Ties: 1BAC: 4
    AOSBAC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    AOS

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    BAC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    AOS
    $0.57
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Mediocre Allocator
    Σ Retained
    $1.07B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$612.2M
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    BAC
    $2.37
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $55.63B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$131.83B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    AOS
    26.3% Margin of Safety
    Price is 26.3% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $64.54
    Fair Value: $87.59
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    BAC
    64.3% Margin of Safety
    Price is 64.3% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $47.01
    Fair Value: $131.82
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    AOS

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $65?

    +5.0%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +8.4%

    The market implies +5.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +8.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    BAC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    AOS
    95/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    BAC
    20/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    AOS
    -2.50
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    BAC
    -2.31
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    AOS
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 108.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders903
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    BAC
    Insiders 7.3%Institutions 71.2%Retail & Other 21.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,445
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    AOS
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    BAC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    AOS
    2
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $3.11M
    SCHUH DARRELL W
    Officer
    $82,126
    @ $74.39 · 2026-03-04
    SCHUH DARRELL W
    Officer
    $28,439
    @ $79.88 · 2026-02-13
    STERN JAMES F
    General Counsel
    $1.24M
    @ $71.24 · 2025-08-07
    WHEELER KEVIN J.
    Officer and Director
    $1.58M
    @ $71.26 · 2025-07-30
    SMITH MARK D
    Director
    $171,264
    @ $71.36 · 2025-07-29
    HEIDEMAN ROBERT JAMES
    Chief Technology Officer
    $67,357
    @ $65.65 · 2025-02-07
    KARGE DOUGLAS SAMUEL
    Officer
    $27,507
    @ $65.65 · 2025-02-07
    CARVER SAMUEL M
    Officer
    $1.19M
    @ $81.00 · 2024-08-07
    BROWN RONALD DALE
    Director
    $311,071
    @ $85.67 · 2024-07-30
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    BAC
    5
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $20.17M
    MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
    Officer
    $4.41M
    @ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
    SCRIVENER THOMAS M
    Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
    BRONSTEIN SHERI B
    Officer
    $2.99M
    @ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
    ATHANASIA DEAN C
    President
    $6.86M
    @ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
    BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.42M
    @ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
    MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
    Officer
    $3.66M
    @ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
    HANS LINDSAY D
    Officer
    $402,410
    @ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    AOS
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(36/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    BAC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(47/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    AOS
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (36)
    BAC
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
    View AOS Full AnalysisView BAC Full Analysis
    A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) vs Bank of America Corporation (BAC) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io