Compare StocksANET vs NVDA

Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, ANET is overvalued at $170, with a DCF intrinsic value of $151 and a margin of safety of -13%. NVDA is overvalued at $211, with an intrinsic value of $163 and a margin of safety of -29%. Of the two, ANET has the wider margin of safety.

ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
$169.67
VS
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
$210.69

Rewards

ANET
  • Gross margin of 63.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Arista Networks, Inc. scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 111.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
NVDA
  • NVIDIA Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 74.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 193.9% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

ANET
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • FCF yield of 2.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 58.3x is 48% above the historical average of 39.5x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
NVDA
  • FCF yield of 1.9% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Beneish M-Score of -1.06 flags financial patterns consistent with potential earnings manipulation — warrants further investigation.
  • 39 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ANET
NVDA
Valuation
$4.36B
Free Cash Flow
$96.68B
2.04%
FCF Yield
1.89%
58.31
Trailing P/E
32.26
38.13
Forward P/E
16.55
Quality & Moat
N/A
ROIC
63.06%
31.52%
ROE
114.29%
63.54%
Gross Margin
74.14%
2.16
PEG Ratio
0.64
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
No debt
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.92
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.24
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.02%
ANET: 2NVDA: 7
ANETNVDA

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ANET

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

NVDA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ANET
$15.08
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$8.45B
Δ Market Cap
+$127.40B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
NVDA
$17.68
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$220.50B
Δ Market Cap
+$3.90T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ANET
12.7% Overvalued
Price is 12.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $169.67
Fair Value: $150.51
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
NVDA
44.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 44.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $210.69
Fair Value: $378.18
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ANET

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $170?

+22.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +19.1%

The market implies +22.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +19.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

NVDA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $211?

+17.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +20.8%

The market implies +17.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +20.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ANET
93/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
NVDA
69/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ANET
-2.10
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
NVDA
-1.06
Likely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ANET
Insiders 17.3%Institutions 72.9%Retail & Other 9.9%
No. of Institutional Holders2,848
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
NVDA
Insiders 4.0%Institutions 70.9%Retail & Other 25.1%
No. of Institutional Holders7,556
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ANET
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
NVDA
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ANET
8
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $67.20M
BECHTOLSHEIM ANDREAS V
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$39.14M
@ $163.06 · 2026-06-04
ULLAL JAYSHREE
Chief Executive Officer
$2.14M
@ $155.04 · 2026-05-26
BREITHAUPT CHANTELLE YVETTE
Chief Financial Officer
$384,336
@ $157.00 · 2026-05-26
BATTLES KELLY BODNAR
Director
$61,797
@ $146.44 · 2026-05-21
WASSENAAR YVONNE
Director
$136,846
@ $140.93 · 2026-05-20
WASSENAAR YVONNE
Director
$213,533
@ $153.07 · 2026-04-15
BREITHAUPT CHANTELLE YVETTE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.38M
@ $155.02 · 2026-04-14
ULLAL JAYSHREE
Chief Executive Officer
$16.93M
@ $150.11 · 2026-04-13
WASSENAAR YVONNE
Director
$187,404
@ $134.34 · 2026-03-16
WASSENAAR YVONNE
Director
$240,380
@ $132.44 · 2026-02-25
BATTLES KELLY BODNAR
Director
$54,042
@ $128.06 · 2026-02-23
ULLAL JAYSHREE
Chief Executive Officer
$2.99M
@ $124.55 · 2025-11-25
BATTLES KELLY BODNAR
Director
$49,436
@ $117.15 · 2025-11-21
ULLAL JAYSHREE
Chief Executive Officer
$3.19M
@ $132.77 · 2025-08-25
BATTLES KELLY BODNAR
Director
$99,081
@ $114.68 · 2025-07-25
WASSENAAR YVONNE
Director
$15,826
@ $94.20 · 2025-05-21
BATTLES KELLY BODNAR
Director
$102,180
@ $68.49 · 2025-04-22
TAXAY MARC
General Counsel
$4.59M
@ $88.59 · 2025-03-03
ULLAL JAYSHREE
Chief Executive Officer
$12.99M
@ $93.88 · 2025-02-24
WASSENAAR YVONNE
Director
$17,233
@ $102.58 · 2025-02-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
NVDA
1
Sells (3M)
39
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.09B
DABIRI JOHN O
Director
$133,750
@ $214.00 · 2026-05-27
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$942,944
@ $174.75 · 2026-03-20
SHAH AARTI S
Director
$3.36M
@ $176.71 · 2026-03-19
DABIRI JOHN O
Director
$555,440
@ $184.90 · 2026-03-13
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$15.19M
@ $189.85 · 2026-01-02
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$4.43M
@ $179.98 · 2025-12-19
DABIRI JOHN O
Director
$112,317
@ $179.42 · 2025-11-24
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$5.20M
@ $207.91 · 2025-10-29
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$23.56M
@ $188.47 · 2025-10-28
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$40.73M
@ $181.04 · 2025-10-23
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$41.06M
@ $182.48 · 2025-10-20
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$41.34M
@ $183.73 · 2025-10-15
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$42.89M
@ $190.60 · 2025-10-10
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$42.05M
@ $186.89 · 2025-10-07
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$42.09M
@ $187.08 · 2025-10-02
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$40.23M
@ $178.82 · 2025-09-29
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$40.21M
@ $178.69 · 2025-09-24
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$39.18M
@ $174.14 · 2025-09-19
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$617,298
@ $176.37 · 2025-09-19
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$39.75M
@ $176.66 · 2025-09-16
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$39.28M
@ $174.59 · 2025-09-11
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$38.01M
@ $168.95 · 2025-09-08
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$38.61M
@ $171.60 · 2025-09-03
HUDSON BEACH DAWN E
Director
$15.38M
@ $170.90 · 2025-09-03
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$27.12M
@ $180.79 · 2025-08-15
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$40.96M
@ $182.04 · 2025-08-13
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$40.66M
@ $180.70 · 2025-08-08
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$39.78M
@ $176.80 · 2025-08-05
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$40.18M
@ $178.58 · 2025-07-31
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$39.16M
@ $174.02 · 2025-07-28
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$38.22M
@ $169.87 · 2025-07-23
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$38.71M
@ $172.05 · 2025-07-18
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$37.59M
@ $167.08 · 2025-07-15
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$36.43M
@ $161.91 · 2025-07-10
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$35.55M
@ $158.02 · 2025-07-07
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$35.16M
@ $156.27 · 2025-07-01
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$30.47M
@ $152.33 · 2025-06-26
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$14.40M
@ $144.04 · 2025-06-23
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$646,469
@ $143.66 · 2025-06-20
BURGESS ROBERT KENNETH
Director
$6.74M
@ $134.82 · 2025-05-30
DABIRI JOHN O
Director
$91,608
@ $138.80 · 2025-05-30
KRESS COLETTE M.
Chief Financial Officer
$7.79M
@ $116.83 · 2025-03-21
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$525,585
@ $116.80 · 2025-03-21
SHAH AARTI S
Director
$2.37M
@ $118.42 · 2025-03-20
BURGESS ROBERT KENNETH
Director
$6.16M
@ $115.49 · 2025-03-13
DABIRI JOHN O
Director
$292,930
@ $110.00 · 2025-03-10
KRESS COLETTE M.
Chief Financial Officer
$9.03M
@ $135.40 · 2024-12-13
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$608,775
@ $135.28 · 2024-12-13
DABIRI JOHN O
Director
$101,672
@ $142.00 · 2024-11-25
KRESS COLETTE M.
Chief Financial Officer
$7.77M
@ $116.59 · 2024-09-20
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$524,293
@ $116.51 · 2024-09-20
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$28.55M
@ $118.97 · 2024-09-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ANET
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
NVDA
FearGreed
😐Neutral(56/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ANET
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
NVDA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
View ANET Full AnalysisView NVDA Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ANET vs NVDA

Is Arista Networks, Inc. or NVIDIA Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ANET trades at a -12.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $151 vs. price $170), compared to NVDA's -29.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $163 vs. $211).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Arista Networks, Inc. or NVIDIA Corporation?

ANET scores 93/100 (Wide moat), while NVDA scores 69/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Arista Networks, Inc. or NVIDIA Corporation?

Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) generates a 2.0% free cash flow yield, compared to NVIDIA Corporation's 1.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Does NVIDIA Corporation have accounting red flags?

NVDA's Beneish M-Score of -1.1 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, ANET scores -2.1, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.

ANET vs NVDA: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io